"Sino -US business relations are better than news title!"

Chairman of the National Committee of the United States and China Relations: Sino -US business relations are better than news title!

"Sino -US business relations are better than those of the news reports (seemingly)." In an exclusive interview with the President of the United States and China Relations National Committee on the 27th of the Forbes website, the old qualification U.S. Relations Observer has performed such an expression. In the interview, Forbes asked the impact of the impact of the U.S. -related bill involving the United States and the U.S. tariffs on China on China. The conclusion given by Ollen is that the two -way trade between China and the United States exceeds 650 billion U.S. dollars per year. Said that China is still an important market.

Screenshot of Forbes News Network

Forbes News said that Ollen has been the chairman of the National Committee of the United States and China Relations since 2005, and has more than 40 years of experience in China and the United States business and diplomacy. Members of this committee include Disney, Intel, Wal -Mart and other multinational companies.

Regarding the situation of Sino -US business relations, Orens replied: "It is better than written in the news title." He said that he would distinguish American capital entities as "for (develop in China) in China" and " In order to export in China, two types. "Those 'people who are in China' will stay there," said Olens. "" Shanghai's (new crown epidemic) blockade will only stagnate their investment plans, but no one has thought of withdrawing. They still think that China is an indispensable part of their global expansion plan. For many of them, this is the most important market in the world. "

Olens data map, from the United States and China National Relations Committee

When the reporter asked the development direction of US export -oriented companies, Ollen said that some companies are traveling to Southeast Asia, such as Vietnam, which is the reason why US tariffs are relatively low, but the infrastructure of Southeast Asian countries is not particularly particularly particularly special. Complete. In addition, he also said that the return of American companies to return to the United States. This is a situation that has not happened or rarely happened. "I did not see evidence that (the United States) companies were closing China's business and moved back to the United States. The business committees and chambers of commerce did not see the evidence that was happening. As we predicted, (the Trump era increased) The premise of tariffs to re -return these companies has been proven to be wrong, "Ollenus said.

As for the reasons for the trend of "rarely occurring in enterprises", Ollen said that the reason is that "the cost difference is too great." "The infrastructure around these (in China) companies is too developed. Unless the US government decides that we want to formulate an industrial policy to provide US companies with $ 500 billion in funds and let them transfer the manufacturing industry to the United States, otherwise you will you You can't pick up these companies to the United States, "Olens explained.

In the interview, Ollen also talked about the impact of the U.S. -related Act in Xinjiang on the potential of American companies in China, and believed that the actual results of its actual generation need to be seen. As for the controversy in the United States, whether to reduce tariffs on China, Paleos believes that reducing tariffs will help relieve inflation. People will see that prices are declining and they will believe that inflation is relieved.

Source: Global Network/Lin Zeyu

- END -