The United States wants to draw a big cake to smash China?

The "stricter to deal with China's script" in the United States opened a corner. President Biden announced at the G7 summit on the 26th that the United States will raise $ 600 billion in global infrastructure investment with other six countries by 2027. Although Biden did not point out the name of China, the United States and Western media did not conceal that this was to "confront" or "compete" China's "Belt and Road" initiative.

For this "ambitious" plan, people's first feeling was that the United States painted another big cake. The US $ 600 billion mission has "claimed" US $ 200 billion, and the rest is shared by other six countries. If others say it, it is impossible for the United States to get $ 200 billion at all. It is not to look at the United States, but its own actual behavior that gives the outside world a deep impression.

At the G7 summit held in the UK last June, the United States drew a cake. At that time, a nice name was made: "Reconstruction a better world", claiming to improve the infrastructure of 40 trillion US dollars in developing countries, it was also designed for the "Belt and Road". But in a year, the United States' investment commitment to global infrastructure construction is only a trivial $ 6 million, which is far from Bayeng's previous plan. Today, how can people believe that the United States will come up with $ 200 billion in real gold silver?

In fact, the American routine has long been seen. Washington has no interest in the construction of global infrastructure. Besides, there are still so many debts in the United States' own infrastructure construction. According to a report from the American Civil Engineer Society last year, the United States faced a gap of $ 2.59 trillion in infrastructure in the next decade. In this context, its purpose is to destroy the "Belt and Road" initiated by China, and the big cakes drawn by Washington are used as iron cakes to smash China.

The focus of the US attack is to slander the "Belt and Road" initiative that has caused the "debt trap". A spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded to this on the 27th. If all can be implemented, it is expected to generate 1.6 trillion US dollars in the world by 2030, accounting for 1.3%of the global GDP, of which 90%will be shared by partnerships, and low -income and low -income countries will benefit more. From 2015 to 2030, 7.6 million people will get rid of extreme poverty and 32 million people get rid of moderate poverty. In fact, there is no saying that the "Belt and Road" partner country recognizes the so -called "Belt and Road" to cause debt trap ".

In response to the "rebuilding better world" plan proposed last year, the US "Diplomacy" magazine recently said that the most serious defect of the plan is that it always depends on Washington's "condemnation" of China. Over the years, where the development of China has benefited, Washington will be chased with "chasing". In various versions of Washington's "solutions", the so -called "democracy" can be seen, the real "confrontation" is visible, and the "China" that is demonized by the demon is not seen as an object. Developed countries and local people.

In fact, in our opinion, even the infrastructure construction of this superpower in the United States has huge room for improvement, let alone the world? According to a previous report of G20, there will be a $ 15 trillion investment gap in global infrastructure by 2040. Infrastructure construction, a big starting point for the overall progress of human beings, has extremely broad development space. It is impossible for anyone to suspect that there is a lot of money. If it is not Washington's narrow mind, the United States can be completely, in fact, it is necessary to " The Belt and Road Initiative is at least benign.

Interestingly, Feng Delin, the chairman of the European Commission, said that Europe will try to raise funds of about 300 billion euros to fund developing countries, thereby "replacing China's investment in these places." These words have been criticized by many developers in developing countries. Some netizens asked: Why is Feng Delin said "replacement", not "supplement" outside of Chinese funds? Is her meaning that developing countries must "choose one" between the West and China? But why do international cooperation be engaged in this "two choices"?

In fact, there are few games that develop countries like camp confrontation. More importantly, everyone knows that "painting cakes" cannot be hungry.

- END -