Guan Yao: Why does the Japanese phase perform "Various Disiners" at the G7 summit?

Direct news: The G7 summit is threatening to raise 600 billion US dollars in the next five years by government and civilian raising methods. With the "Belt and Road" initiative initiated by China, it will compete. Mr. Guan, what do you think of this?

Special commentator Guan Yao: This week's G7 summit and NATO Summit were held in the continuous axis in Germany and Spain. The biggest focus of the outside world is how to coordinate the latest actions to Russia in the United States, including sanctions. For a month, the Russian offense in the Unthonbas area was overwhelming.

但我注意到，就是在这种情形下，《今日美国报》记者今天从G7峰会现场发出的专题报道，还特辟了一个小节，Don't forget about China，“别忘了中国”，美The report quoted a blower of the White House officials that before the opening of the summit and the premier of the host State, the premier of the host State, Dourz, specially discussed the issue of China. Biden emphasized that competition with China will be one of the main axis of its foreign policies. This also foreshadows the wind direction of these two consecutive summits, and the United States will encourage Western countries to play so -called Chinese cards. The British Reuters is a electrical manuscript held from the G7 Summit on Sunday. It also quotes an anonymous official of the White House preview that at the NATO Spanish Summit that unveiled Wednesday (29th), it will pass NATO strategic documents. Clarify NATO's so -called "new strategic concepts", including establishing strategic goals and declared common values. The anonymous official did not deny that the new strategic document of NATO will reach China for the first time, and it will clearly tough China. Reuters' telegram will make the original "‘ Strong ’On China", and it will directly enter the title. Therefore, from this point of view, these two consecutive summits are indeed worthy of attention to vigilance. What issues will be manipulated in the United States and Western to make Chinese cards, we must follow up.

Only by understanding such a background can we deeply observe the full malice of the G7's so -called "infrastructure replacement plan". In fact, Western media have already created public opinion. One of the highest English keywords mentioned by mentioning is countr, which is to "fight" the "Belt and Road" initiative. However, it is necessary to point out that the so -called "infrastructure plan" based on "confrontation" and the camp -based confrontation based on the "confrontation" thinking is destined to go far, because the US Western infrastructure motion itself has a series of inability to answer.

Direct news: So what are the informants of the G7 infrastructure that cannot be answered?

Special commentator Guan Yao: The first question was, of course, where the money came from. It didn't take long for Biden to come to power, and proposed that the domestic infrastructure upgrade plan involved trillions of dollars involved in the country, but it is planned to be sent to Congress Mountain for various stutters and controversy, and even Bayeng's party members have recruited. The domestic infrastructure mobilization is not enough, let alone invest in overseas? Biden claims that the United States has invested US $ 200 billion and the EU contributes 300 billion euros. Other G7 member states will also contribute to each other, but all of these countries are facing inflation tigers in China. You can decide on taking pictures and chests. Secondly, infrastructure investment has always been planned for a long time. The time window covered by $ 600 billion is the next five years. Which leader of the G7 dare to promise, after 5 years, he must be on the stage? After Biden, if a Trump -style successor will be signed on the first day of the White House, will this so -called "overseas infrastructure plan" be signed and invalidated? Bayeng's first visit to Europe was the first visit after he took office, and he shouted "The United States is back" all the way, but the French "World News" was asked in the key version at the time. Yes, the United States came back, but I planned How long does it take? Between the long -term attributes of Western party rotation and infrastructure investment, there are irreconcilable contradictions and tensions.

For 10,000 steps, even if the problem of infrastructure funds can be solved, how will this money spend? Obviously, the West is determined to make overseas infrastructure investment into strategic tools. Otherwise, how can you start to talk about the "Belt and Road" initiative? Last week, China's top leader instructed the keynote speeches in the opening ceremony of the BRICS Business Forum to warn that the weaponization of the world's economic and political tools will eventually harm others. This discussing the pain points of the world's pain and triggering strong resonance. If the West invested in infrastructure projects in developing countries, it also made the so -called distorted operation of the so -called political tool -based weapons, isn't it manufacturing a new "infrastructure intervention trap"? On the day before the G7 summit was held, the US "Baron" weekly published this title comment. Rich leaders should stop short commitments and truly formulate implementation plans. But is this Bayeon willing to do it?

Straight News: Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Tian Wenxiong deliberately appealed during the G7 Summit that the risk of changing the status quo in the "Indo -Pacific" area continued to rise in the "Indo -Pacific" area. It is necessary to prevent the country from learning from the Russian and Ukraine conflict. How do you comment on this?

Special commentator Guan Yao: Japan's so -called "multi -dynamic disease" on multilateral occasions in international occasions, and this time, the Japanese Prime Minister deliberately wanted to use these two backbone summits as its own "performance stage" to grasp the Japanese side. This so -called "major opportunity" is to cooperate with the United States to perform hard. Japan was invited to the NATO Summit for the first time this time. The Chinese card, performing so -called "marine security concerns" and other "pseudo agenda". The reason why I said this is the inertia of the Japanese side's "Disadvantage of China". Previously, Kishida delivered a keynote speech in Singapore's "Xianghui", including the "Xianghui" speech of the Xiangxiangfu Fu, which was speculated by foreign media. Hua's "firepower is fully opened", among which the "Xianghui" of Kishidu spoke, and was pointed out by the Japanese media to show China "unprecedented rare tough gesture."

Kishida's so -called "Indo -Pacific" status quo, especially the status quo of the ocean, and even deliberately speculating and rendering. The so -called to ensure that other countries cannot learn from the Ukrainian situation. Refers to China ", Kishida has named the normalized cruise of the Chinese Diaoyu Islands and the development of oil and gas fields in the East China Sea, and moves the so -called" force change the status quo ". It is worthwhile that Japan is increasingly presenting this tendency to use the "multi -dynamic disease" on multilateral occasions as its most important "league trick", that is, to discredit China with these bottomless lines to discredit China with these bottomless lines. The number of attack roads is increasingly bound to the United States. In one sentence, Japan is in the area in the area where the "Indo -Pacific Strategy" is "Indo -Pacific Strategy" at the expense of the United States.

Author 丨 Man Yao, special commentator of Shenzhen Satellite TV "Live Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan"

Editor 丨 Yu Zheyi, editor -in -chief of Shenzhen Satellite TV Direct News

- END -