WHO: have nothing to do with me

Author: Liang Youzhi

On the 23rd, an organization named "WHN" announced the monkey acne as a major epidemic. Because the name of the organization was similar to the World Health Organization (WHO), and they mentioned the WHO in the announcement statement, so that they were in English, so that they were in English. Many people have begun to declare that "WHO announced that monkey acne is a big epidemic."

So, has WHO announced this news? What is the relationship between this WHN and WHO?

To check the news, the author first found the official social media account and official website named WHN organization on the Internet, and found that its full name was "World Health Network" (translated as "World Health Network").

However, the Russian satellite news agency that "WHN announced that monkey acne is a big epidemic" has been published in the Chinese network. In the report, the WHO emphasized that the WHO has never issued "Monkey Acne is the" Monkey Acne is the acne. The statement of the Big Popularity "has nothing to do with the World Health Organization, and the WHN issued by this statement has nothing to do with it.

On the official website of WHN, the organization also clearly stated that he is a non -governmental organization in the United States.

The picture intercepts from the Russian satellite news agency website (above), WHN website

At first glance, it seems that the so -called "WHO announced that monkey acne is a big epidemic" is just the name of the netizens who cared about the names of the two organizations, and then the misunderstanding caused by rumors.

However, when the author verifies various information, he found that from the WHN that published this news to the mainstream foreign media that spread the news, although each of them seemed to have no "intentional rumors and rumors", they had many more. Maximum use of netizens' psychology to earn traffic for themselves.

Let's talk about WHN yourself. As a non -authoritative agency, WHN obviously misleads the composition of others when he published his own point of view.

In addition to the abbreviation of the organization name and the WHO, they issued unofficially in the name of "Announcement" and "News Term", and widely spread in social media accounts. It is said that the "WHN's statement is before the meeting held by WHO (WHO) on the 23rd", which is suspected of using the name and keyword "touching porcelain".

The picture intercepts from the WHN website

As for the WHOs that the WHOs mentioned on the 23rd, from the official report of the WHO, the meeting did not announce the polyettes as a major epidemic. This also once again shows that the so -called "WHO announcement" is a fake news.

The foreign media that spread this news is not so innocent. After the WHN issued a statement and caused heated online discussions, some British and American self -media and tabloids published the news first, followed by mainstream American media such as the American "business inside story" and CNBC local channels. Among them, the "Business Internal Display" website also uses the title of "World Health Network announced that the outbreak of monkey acne is a major epidemic". If you don't look closely, it is easy to see as "the announcement of the WHO".

However, this WHN neither has any authoritative academic achievements, nor is it a well -known industry authoritative academic institution. Why does WHN send it, and these mainstream media have rushed to forward it like this? Is it really wrong, or do you just think this "news" sounds traffic?

The picture intercepts from the "Business Insider" network

Although the Russian satellite news agency reported that the original text clarified that "WHN has nothing to do with WHO", on their Chinese Weibo, the link title behind it is "WHO officially announced that monkey acne is a big epidemic."

It is precisely because of this false title that is very eye -catching. As of press time, this Weibo has triggered 15,000 reposts. From the comments area, many readers obviously have no point in the link to see the report clarified, but hold on to hold, but hold on to hold, but hold on to hold. The mentality of "the WHO said a big event" spread the news.

As for ordinary netizens who reposted this news, it is difficult to blame them. They cannot ask for non -professionals to have a strong verification ability and consciousness.

This seemingly "none of them", the rotten stalls in the end "no one come to clean up" is too worthy of being in the Internet age.

- END -