The "Five Eye Alliance" is secretly motioning for "new moves" to China?｜ Beijing Observation

According to the Global Times reported on the 18th, the "Five Eye Alliance" is collecting and fabricating evidence to plan a series of rumors of "China's political infiltration of the West" to slander China's international image.

It is reported that intelligence agencies such as Australia and other countries have frequently approached and harassed the local Chinese communities, put pressure on them to seduce them to become the "Five Eye Alliance". But at the same time, these countries forcibly deduct the so -called "spy" and "penetration" hats based on some information that can not stand completely.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin inquired at a regular press conference today (21st) that the relevant countries must explain this, and urge relevant countries to stop political penetration, stop spreading false information from China, and stop curbing China to curb China Suppress.

"When it comes to 'political penetration', the United States and Britain and other countries have always been familiar with driving. The United States is under the banner of" freedom '' 'democratic', and in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the Middle East, Latin America and other places to move the "color revolution", the manufacturing area is turbulent to realize its own self Geopolical goals. "Wang Wenbin said.

Wang Wenbin further pointed out that politicians in the United States, Britain and other countries frequently linked frequently in the anti -China -China chaos. The United States gathered the "Five Eye Alliance" countries to draw on Hong Kong affairs by issuing a joint statement. "" White gloves ", interfered with Hong Kong's political agenda many times, attempting to turn Hong Kong into a bridgehead for subverting and penetration of mainland China. These facts are well known. While the United States and Britain and other countries have penetrated and interfered in China, they also rake to China, exposing its deep -rooted "cold war thinking" and ideological bias.

Today, the "Five Eye Alliance" is strong in China but it is not a "iron plate"

The "Five Eye Alliance" was born in World War II. It was an intelligence sharing alliance consisting of five "Anglo-Saxon" countries of the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Essence

With the changes in the international situation, the "Five Eye Alliance" is constantly adjusting its strategic goals. Nowadays, the core goal is set to a strategic competition for China, which has also gradually evolved from the intelligence alliance to a political security alliance.

It should be pointed out that the United States lives with the "Five Eye Alliance". The concept of security in the United States plays a vital role in the shaping of the alliance mechanism and the determination of goals. Other member states depend on the United States in terms of intelligence and security.

In terms of strengthening competition against China, the Biden government is better than its predecessor Trump. And Biden emphasized the "small circle" politics. The analysis pointed out that the Bayeng government used the "concentric circle" that "concentric circles" of "me -oriented" by attracting allies and partners is an important strategy to promote the so -called "Indo -Pacific Strategy". Its essence is to safeguard the US hegemony and emphasize strategic competition in China. The "Five Eye Alliance" is an important part of it. With the strengthening of the United States' confrontation with China policies, the "Five Eye Alliance", a very historic and operating alliance mechanism, will undoubtedly strengthen the functions of the coordination of China policy.

In recent years, the hands of the "Five Eye Alliance" and its member states have become longer and longer, and the door -to -door adjustment on China has gradually increased. In addition to rough interference in China's internal affairs, it also created the so -called "clean network" plan to promote "decoupling" of technology to China, etc., and frequent pressure on China from the fields of diplomacy, economy and security.

However, the "Five Eye Alliance" is not a iron plate, and its internal strategy has a temperature difference in China.

Take New Zealand as an example.

On April 19, 2021, New Zealand Foreign Minister Malhota said that the "Five Eye Alliance" expanded its scope of power made New Zealand "uneasy". 'A collective sound of the scope of power. "

Malhota said New Zealand is more inclined to formulate independent foreign policies. She also emphasizes the importance of new China relations.

Not satisfied with the status quo "Five Eye Alliance" to expand?

It is worth noting that the "Five Eyes Alliance" is not satisfied with the status quo. In addition to expanding the scope of activities, the idea of ​​expanding the personnel is also sprouted.

Shenzhen Satellite TV directly noticed that a report released by the US Congress Intelligence and Special Action Group Committee in 2021 states that "In order to cope with the competition of great powers (China and Russia), the" Five Eye Alliance "countries must cooperate more closely and expand the trust circle ", Also claimed to absorb other" like -minded democracy ". The report proposes to absorb Japan, South Korea, India and Germany into the "Five Eyes Alliance". However, the US Congress rejected the proposal at the time.

However, one country is very positive among the naming countries.

According to reports on May 12, Japan's "Nikkei Asia" magazine website, Japan is considering strengthening cooperation with the "Five Eye Alliance". Although from the perspective of the heterogeneity of culture and history, there is still a certain distance between the "Five Eyes Alliance" and its allies in Japan, but due to the rise of China, the possibility of Japan joining the alliance to become the "sixth eye" is becoming increasingly more and more. big.

Britain and the United States platform for this. British Prime Minister Johnson has issued an active statement on Japan's "Five Eye Alliance". Former US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Amata also said that the United States and Japan should pay more practical efforts to move towards the direction of creating the "Six Eyes".

After World War II, the Japanese government's intelligence collection system was collectively weak in the United States, so Japanese intelligence relied on the United States. This also makes it difficult for Japan to contribute to its Western allies. If Japan and the "Five Eyes Alliance" agreed to share information in the future, Japan needs to make legal self -loosening to enhance the opportunity to become the "sixth eye". In fact, Japan has continuously improved the level of military intelligence in recent years. The Japanese government currently operates 8 intelligence collection satellites, and its satellite system has the advantages of covering China, North Korea, Russia and other East Asia. Providing satellite images and military signals to the "Five Eye Alliance" is a stepping stepping tile in Japan to join the alliance.

Unlike Japan, South Korea, who is in East Asia, is more prudent in whether it will join the "Five Eyes Alliance".

Former South Korean Minister of Defense Xu Xu said that South Korea's invitation to South Korea to join the "Five Eyes Alliance" still requires multiple considerations.

For the essence of the "Five Eyes", South Korea can also see clearly. Park Yuankun, a professor at the issue of the Peninsula of the University of Ewhals, said that the "Five Eye Alliance" is an extremely extraordinary intelligence alliance. For South Korea, this is an opportunity to get high -quality intelligence, but this will bring a considerable price, especially in the relationship with China. "South Korea Herald" holds the same view and publishes the title of "Five Eye Alliance" invitations to bring a price. New pressure -to make choices between its largest allies in the United States and the largest trading partner China.

It should be pointed out that the "five-eye alliance" is very particular about the "blood" of "Anglo-Saxon", and its five member states are highly homogeneous in language and culture. The analysis believes that even in the Obama's "Golden Age", in addition to the "Five Eye Alliance" leaders, German Chancellor Merkel could not escape by the United States. This means that the "allies circle" that the United States has pulled up is distinguished from both inside and outside. Even European Germany is still treated. Can some active Asian countries be accepted by the "Anglo-Saxon" alliance? There are counts in its heart.

- END -