The US media admits that China has caught a large loophole

Author: Geng Zhi

On September 15, local time, the Council of the International Atomic Energy Institutional Council discussed the requirements of member states such as China and other members. The act of conducting technical cooperation in nuclear submarines, illegal transfer of nuclear materials, and destroying international nuclear non -diffusion principles.

In the meantime, Chinese representatives accurately held a dead point in the transfer of illegal nuclear materials in the United States and Australia. Even some mainstream media in the United States acknowledged that China did discover a major loophole in the cooperation between the United States and British nuclear submarines.

As shown in the figure below, when the Bloomberg reported the matter, the American Bloomberg rarely presented the Chinese Permanent Permanent Representative of the United Nations of Vienna in Vienna in truth and details. The distinctive attitude on the nuclear issue is a "double standard". It also introduced the view of the Chinese side with multiple paragraphs, and quoted a large number of words of Ambassador Wang Qun.

Screenshot comes from Bloomberg report

Moreover, although Bloomberg also gave the United States in the report, this American media rarely did not lower China's voice to highlight the voice of the United States, but instead achieved a "balance".

The reason why it is "rare" is that in the past, many US Western media, including Bloomberg, in order to highlight some of the US claims and suppress China's voice, often use the content of about 70 % of the report to speak to the United States, and The content is detailed, and the Chinese side will only be assigned to the text part of the report in the report, and most of them are "political slogans" after the context and deletion.

What's even more rare is that Bloomberg also acknowledged that China did discover that there was a large loophole in cooperation between the United States and Britain and Australia.

Bloomberg first pointed out in the report that the reason why China believes that the US dual standard is because the United States requires Iran to greatly limit the number of nuclear fuel and accept the supervision of international atomic energy agencies. One of the vulnerabilities, preparing to hand over a large number of weapon -level highly concentrated uranium to Australia when cooperating with Australia, and bypass the supervision of international atomic energy agencies. Therefore, China and other member states that are consistent with Chinese stances will hope that through the International Atomic Energy Agency Council to hold a meeting, it is determined that the approach to the United States and Britain and Australia will destroy the principle of non -proliferation.

Subsequently, Bloomberg acknowledged that there was indeed a loophole in the international "nuclear non -diffusion treaty". Although the treaty has strictly restricted the high -concentrated uranium of weapons and formulated an international review mechanism, there is a backdoor Grade high-concentrated uranium is used for non-explosiveness including driving nuclear submarine power (the treaty is called "Non-PROSCRIBED"), as long as the relevant guarantee commitment is made to the international atomic energy agency Critical review.

Screenshot comes from Bloomberg report

The picture shows the terms of the comprehensive guarantee supervision agreement of the "nuclear non -diffusion treaty" left in the back door in Document INFCIRC/153

Of course, the problem of the loopholes in the international "nuclear non -diffusion treaty", not only in China and other countries, such as the United States, Britain, Australia, have proposed that they have repeatedly pointed out after cooperating with nuclear submarines in the AUKUS alliance. The project is negative and dangerous for nuclear diffusion. On September 21 last year, an article from the US Think Trinky International Peace Research Institute expressed such a view.

The picture shows an article published by the US Think Turk Kaneki International Peace Research Institute on September 21, 2021, which believes that the AUKUS nuclear submarine project has a great negative impact on the non -diffusion of the international nuclear.

However, these western scholars and the opposition in the think tank are not all due to the non -proliferation mechanism of maintaining nuclear. Just as Bloomberg now suddenly presents more Chinese opposition in the report, they are actually worried about the mouth that AUKUS opened, and they will be used by the United States and Western that the United States and the West in the United States and the West. Own.

Therefore, in the period when Bloomberg admits that there are large loopholes in the US -British and Australian nuclear submarine cooperation projects, it will follow such a paragraph: "Iran has also proposed that the country can produce high uranium for nuclear submarines" " Essence Even in the article of the Carnegie International Peace Research Institute last year, it also appeared that Iran also worried that Iran would use this vulnerability.

Therefore, even the supporters of the US official and the United States and the United States and Britain's nuclear submarine continue to escape themselves, saying that Australia is not Iran, the "international reputation" of the two countries is not comparable. In deliberate drilling empty weapons, etc., some netizens teased that since they all think that this vulnerability has nothing to do, I may wish to let Iran also engage in nuclear submarines — even simply send Cuban, Argentina and other Latin American countries?

- END -