The anti -China "white glove" of this US -Australian intelligence department has just received 5 million financing!

In the past two years, an Australian "Network Security Company" named "Internet 2.0" (Internet 2.0 "has begun to appear at the forefront of publicity offensive offensive in Australia and the United States.

Although the "company" was established in 2019, in the past three years, it has cooperated with the intelligence security departments of Australia and the United States and the anti -China forces in the media. A few months ago, a report of a rumor -made Chinese byte beating company TIKTOK, Tiktok, an overseas pop social software, saying that Tiktok was collecting data information for foreigners for the Chinese government.

Despite the vulnerabilities of these rumors, this "network security company" served in the United States and Australia has recently successfully obtained a valuation of about $ 50 million and financing over $ 5 million.

A "Anti -China Bai Glove" established by Australia's "post -80s"

Let me briefly introduce the general situation of this "Internet 2.0". The "company" is a "post -80s" man Robert Potter, a "post -80s" man who has worked in a network intelligence security department in Australia and has a cooperative relationship with the State Department of the United States, and David, the former intelligence personnel of the Australian military. David Robinson was established in 2019.

Among them, Porter is the main face that usually represents the appearance of "Internet 2.0" on the outside world. He also has close relations with the Australian Liberal Party where the former Prime Minister of Australia, Schote Morrison, is also closely related to the Australian Liberal Party, especially in the party who is close to the United States and hostile Chinese politicians. For example Taiwan independence, "James Paterson, the anti -Chinese politician, who had instigated the anti -Chinese politician on the eve of the Winter Olympics in Beijing 2022.

It is worth mentioning that this Patson is also the Minister of Fortune Web Security in Australia, and Potter happens to be his "consultant".

In short, these resumes and political relations have also made Porter and his "Internet 2.0" quickly become an important "helper" for Australia and the United States to discredit offensive against China in just a few years. Among them, there are four cases that Geng Zhi knows -although these four cases are quite ridiculous and stupid.

First of all, around May 2021, Porter Murdoch News Group, which cooperated with Australia's anti -China Anti -China, created rumors to slander China on the source of the new crown virus. At that time, in order to tell the new crown virus as a "biological weapon" of China's "biological weapons" by Murdoch, a book actually circulated on the Chinese network suspected of the SARS virus in 2003 was a "American biochemical weapon" book. "SARS and non -natural origin and human -made new species of virus gene weapons", said that it is the "leaked document" of the Chinese military, and then declare that this so -called "confidential document" proves that China is undergoing the coronary virus "weaponization of weaponsization "Research. At the time, Porter used the "professional force" of "Internet 2.0" to "verify" the "authenticity" of this "leak" document for the Australian News.

But embarrassing is that many scholars who have really brainless, such as Pan Chengxin, associate professor of international relations at the Australian University of Australia, soon discovered that Potter's "Military Documents" for the "Verification" of the Australian News " You can find it everywhere on the Chinese network, and you can also buy it in China's online bookstore.

The Chinese scholar did not forget to ridicule Potter, saying that it is not necessary to find out that the incident does not require the so -called network security professional skills or the working background of working with the US State Department.

Secondly, in 2021, Porter and his "Internet 2.0" made a more absurd "report" around October, saying that they were analyzed by thousands of scientific research institutions from Wuhan from 2007 to 2019. The procurement data of scientific research instruments found that the cost of PCR equipment purchased in Wuhan's units in 2019 is "far more than" in 2018, and it is the most prominent in September and October 2019. This report announced that the new crown epidemic may have appeared in Wuhan as early as 2019.

However, at that time, Geng Zhi, through a detailed analysis and comparison of the purchasing information given in this report, including the data on the purchase information website from the pocket bag, soon discovered the three major loopholes of the "Internet 2.0" report. Error errors, for example: ① deliberately concealed the extensive and universal use of PCR instruments, and through information pollution, people think that PCR instruments are only used to "measure the new crown"; The amount of a large number of experimental instruments is counted as the amount of PCR instruments, which is "serious water injection" for data; ③ The use of some data is extremely chaotic. Essence (If you are interested, you can poke here to read our rumors in detail at the time: exposure IQ, Australian anti -China media collectively "send face")

As a result, even Bloomberg, a report that reported the report "Internet 2.0" at the time, had to point out the problem in the report. For example, the use of PCR instruments is actually extensive and common. What are the conclusions.

The third thing was that on the eve of the Australian election at the beginning of this year, Australia's then Prime Minister Scott Morrison was "blocked" by Tencent through government hype. The truth of this matter is actually very funny, and Morrison's team is self -proclaimed. They actually found a registered person in the Australian Prime Minister through the intermediary. As a result, the Chinese later turned the account with the account "migration" function provided by WeChat because of the trouble with the intermediary. Only caused Morrison to be unable to log in. We also reported this matter at the time. Everyone was interested in poke: Mr. Prime Minister, you want to lie to deceive the votes, but please don't pull it to China! )

However, Morrison and a group of Australian media who supported him were unwilling to admit this shame. He still wanted to blame China, and even wanted to take his campaign opponent. China was blocking him to block Morrison. Potter also participated in this public opinion action that "washing the land" and slandering China for Morrison at the time. The ground claimed that Tencent knew that Morrison had lost his account but did not help him find it, that was, he deliberately blocked the Australian Prime Minister.

The screenshot was the part of the Porter who helped the Morrison's side and attack China in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation at that time.

As for this fourth case, it is discredited Tiktok. Around July this year, Porter and his "Diwang 2.0" released another report, saying that they found the code and IP information of TIKTOK, a TIKTOK of Chinese bytes beating companies overseas through analysis of data, and found that TIKTOK would "excessively" overly "excessive" excessive "Collect user data, and will also" send these data to servers in mainland China. "

However, Tiktok hit these allegations directly on the Internet at the time, and directly responded to Potter's own social account. According to TIKTOK, Porter and his "Internet 2.0" did not understand how tiktok operated. I made a mistake in Tiktok's IP address information and exaggerated the data category collected by Tiktok. After any communication and contact, its allegations of TIKTOK are completely unscrupulous.

The phantom behind the $ 5 million financing

However, although in our opinion, Porter and his "Internet 2.0" means low -level and jokes, but limited by language barriers and information barriers, the low -level rumors and false reports he fabricated It has brought negative impacts to China and meets the needs of Australia and even the American intelligence security sector, politics and the media in the media.

Therefore, according to the Australian News and the Australian Financial Review News, Potter and his "Internet 2.0" recently led under the "private equity fund" that closely related to the Australian and American intelligence security sector. In the new round of financing, the valuation of $ 50 million was obtained, and the financing of more than $ 5 million was obtained -and the valuation obtained when the "company" was financing last year was only A $ 12 million.

Porter himself did not hide this connection. He posted on social accounts that his "company" could get higher valuations and more financing. Essence

Here, Geng Zhi wants to focus on the "private equity fund" led in this round of financing in "The Internet 2.0". The fund is called the "1941 Fund" (1941 Fund). It is an Australian strategy consulting company named "Bondi Partners" and a "Ellerston Capital" named "Ellerston Capital". The fund company was jointly established last year. According to Potter, "Internet 2.0" is the first investment since the establishment of the fund.

The two institutions that created the "1941 Fund" were "great". The founder of the "Bondi Partner" is Joe Hockey, a Australian liberal party politician who has served as Australian Finance and Australian Ambassador to the United States. The executive chairman of "Elston Capital", Australian Indian businessman Ashok Jacob (Ashok Jacob), is not an ordinary businessman, but the Australian Australia-india-india-india-india-india-notia. Chairman of Council) Board of Directors. The board members of the board of directors not only need the Australian Ministry of Foreign Affairs to appoint, but its chairman needs to be nominated by Australian Foreign Minister. Not only that, a 2019 report of the Australian News also shows that the then Prime Minister Morrison, then Australia, personally assigned Jacques to lead Australia's business delegation to visit India with him. A important person in Indian strategy.

Therefore, although the Australian media reported on the matter of the matter when the "1941 Fund" was established last year, I wanted to dilute the official color of the fund, saying that it was Australia's first "pure private equity investment" to participate in the national security field. These strong official colors are difficult to be "washed off".

Not only that, the fund was named "1941" because 1941 was the first year of Australia and the United States for formal military alliances. At the same time, the "national security field" mainly invested by the fund is also carried out around the AUKUS "Three -Side Security Alliance" established by the US -British and Australian governments. Therefore, the fund's official website not only played the big flag of Australia and the United States, but also clearly mentioned the AUKUS "Three -Side Security Alliance". Avoid saying that the focus of the fund's attention is "military -civilian dual -use technology in the national security field, especially national defense, intelligence and space industry. The "private placement" fund of AUKUS "Three -Side Security Alliance" is not surprising. After completing this round of valuation and financing, Porter posted on social accounts that his "Internet 2.0" In fact, it is based on the "market" of the "three -sided security alliance" around the AUKUS "three -sided security alliance" in the United States and Britain. Retired Major General Gus Mclachlan -also joined the "company" board of directors while "Internet 2.0".

In the end, Brother Geng wanted to say that the reason why we chose to write such a report is to use the "1941 Fund" to financing "Internet 2.0" to further sort out a series of anti -China issues that have cooperated in Australia in Australia in recent years. The role of AUKUS AUKUS AUKUS. Moreover, the participation of the executive chairman of the "Elston Capital" that promotes the Indian strategy for the Australian government, may also mean that Australia and the United States also want to make the QUAD "Quartet security mechanism" composed of the four countries in the United States, Japan and India, and Australia. Among them, play a role.

On the other hand, we also hope to present a development trend in the field of Western intelligence security, including Australia, that is, to promote the work of intelligence security in the way of "capital" and "market". In this regard, it can avoid the many limitations that exist in the past when they come forward to work in this area. Cooperate with the official intelligence and geopolitical needs of geopolitics to make a more extensive effect in public opinion; on the other hand, it can also mobilize and exert its people's power more.

How to effectively respond to this trend and the followers that followed are an important issue that China needs to think.

In addition, we also have a question to the Western media such as Australia and the United States: When you will spread the reports of "companies" that "companies" that serve the Australian and American governments in the Australian and American governments, the report of China and Chinese companies spread as "facts" as "facts". At this time, have you ever thought about whether the production of these contents is a folk behavior or a government behavior? Is these contents paid for the US -Australian government or specially arranged for "point kill"? And do you spread these contents without verification, is it a misleading or even deception for the Western public?

- END -