Why is the Yue Nuclear negotiations that can't be delayed for a long time?

Xinhua News Agency, Tehran, September 4th (International Observation) Why is the Yue Nuclear negotiations that can't be delayed for a long time?

Xinhua News Agency reporter Gao Wencheng

The U.S. government recently said that Iran's proposal made by the restoration of the "final text" of the Iran nuclear agreement in 2015 was "no constructive." This has made the Yue nuclear negotiation prospects unclear again. Analysts pointed out that the Nuclear Agreement negotiated for a long time, and the important reason was that the two parties in the United States were seriously different from the issue of Iran's nuclear issues. At the same time, the United States has a long -term bad history of Iran ’s bullies policies and unilateral exit agreements, which has also made Iran difficult to trust it.

"Ball in the United States"

In July 2015, Iran reached an Iran nuclear agreement with the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany. In May 2018, the United States unilaterally withdrew the agreement, and then restarted and added a series of sanctions on Iran. Since May 2019, Iran has gradually suspended the performance of some of the agreement, but promised to take measures "reversible". Since April 2021, the Iranian nuclear agreement has held multiple rounds of talks in Vienna, Austria, to discuss the recovery of the United States and Iraq, and the United States has involved in negotiations indirectly.

This is the site of the Political General Commissioner of Political Council of the Joint Commissioner of Political Council of the Joint Commissioner of the Joint Committee of the Joint Commissioner of Political Corporation, which was taken in Vienna, Austria. Xinhua News Agency (Photo Conferring in the EU's delegation in Vienna)

At the beginning of August this year, the EU submitted a "final text" about the restoration of the Iraqi Nuclear Agreement to restore the performance of the Iraqi Nuclear Agreement in 2015, and Iran subsequently responded and gave a modification proposal. On August 24, the Iranian side received the United States' proposal to Iran.

The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Kanani said on the 2nd of this month that Iran has completed the evaluation of the US opinion and responded to the United States in order to promote the negotiations. This answer provides a "constructive path" for completing the negotiations. Iran's "Tehran Times" published an article entitled "Back to the United States", saying that at the current stage, Washington has made political decisions for "necessary and obligations" to maintain talks forward.

However, the US media recently quoted the US State Department spokesman that the United States had received the opinions of the Iranian party through the European Union, but the United States believed that it had proposed "no constructiveness." The Iranian negotiating team consultant Mohammed Malandi responded to this that for the United States, "constructive" usually means accepting the US terms, but for Iran, "constructive" means a balanced and guaranteed agreement. Essence If the United States makes the right decision, an agreement can be reached quickly.

American loss of reputation

Recently, the domestic party struggle for the United States has become increasingly fierce. Republicans continue to put pressure on the Democratic government, oppose reaching an agreement with Iran, and even threatened to destroy the possible agreement. The Iranian Republic News Agency reported that it was "internal issues in the United States and Bayeng's government decision -making weakly" to delay the final agreement of all parties. Before the US midterm elections, the United States "did not spend the current government and Democratic political capital on this agreement."

The serious confrontation of the United States has caused its attitude to the Iran nuclear issue repeatedly, including the Trump administration's unilateral withdrawal from the Iranian nuclear agreement unilaterally, which made Iran very doubt that the United States' willingness and ability to continue performing contracts was very doubtful.

On May 8, 2018, at the White House in Washington, USA, then President Trump, then US President Trump, showed the presidential memorandum he signed. Trump announced on the same day that the United States will withdraw from the Iranian nuclear agreement. Xinhua News Agency (Photo by Shen Ting)

Iranian Foreign Minister Abdullahiyan said recently that Iran needs the United States to make "more powerful and more reliable guarantees." The Iranian Guangming News Agency, which is affiliated with the Iranian Supreme National Security Council, commented that considering the history of the United States's unscrupulousness, Tehran has no reason to join an agreement without strong guarantee. In an unstable and not guaranteed agreement, Iran's major economic interests will not be guaranteed, and the demand for foreign companies in Iran cannot be realized.

In an interview with the Qatar Peninsula TV station, Malandi said that the potential agreement to be reached should not have any vagueness, because the United States may use such vulnerabilities as an excuse to withdraw from the Iran nuclear agreement again. The Iran negotiation team tried to set the conditions so that the United States could not withdraw from the agreement without paying the price.

Do not change the domineering school

Analysts believe that the United States has long pursued hostile policies for Iran for a long time, and its overbearing faction has caused continuous tension of bilateral relations, which is a deeper reason for long -term negotiations. At the same time, this also means that the negotiation may be more fragile even if the agreement is reached.

On June 25, Iranian Foreign Minister Abdullahiyan met with Berrely, a senior representative of Foreign and Security Policy in Tehran. Xinhua News Agency (Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

The Trump administration's policy of Irana fully reflects the American bullying. In 2018, the Trump administration unilaterally withdrew from the Iran nuclear agreement to put pressure on Iran. The United States "New York Times" wrote an analysis that the Trump administration withdrew the agreement because "a new set of more compressive sanctions will weaken Iran, enough to humiliate Iran and allow Iran to accept new clauses that are more beneficial to the United States." However, "the limit pressure policy has failed."

After the Biden government came to power, he expressed his intention to restore the implementation of the Iraqi nuclear agreement, but Bagari, deputy foreign minister and chief negotiating of the Iranian nuclear issue, believes that the current US government has not been able to keep a distance from the former government's "infamous (policy) heritage". During the negotiations, the United States continued to increase threats and sanctions on Iraq. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the current and former U.S. governments are addicted to sanctioning as a tool, which is a sign of US hegemony. At the end of last month, the Iranian nuclear negotiations entered a critical stage, and the U.S. military launched an air strike on the so -called "associated with Iran" in northeast Syria for three consecutive days. The Tehran Times pointed out that the air strike in the United States was to imply that it was not rushing to reach an agreement with Iran, and the other was to show that even after signing an agreement with Iran, it would not stop military operations in the region.

Territa Parcy, executive vice president of the U.S. Think Tank, Qinxi, said that the United States seeks to build an anti -Iranian military alliance in the Middle East and provide advanced weapon systems for competitors in Iran. This will exacerbate the division of the Middle East, making it difficult for the Iran nuclear agreement to continue.

- END -