Zhang Sinan: The United States "Back Thorn" allies are no longer news

Direct News: The American Media "Wall Street Journal" was exposed. The US Minister of Energy Grandhom asked not to increase exports in the near future. In Europe, which was in Europe that was in a energy crisis because of sanctioning Russia, it was criticized by the outside world as a "backbone allies". What are the evaluations?

Special commentator Zhang Sinan: It is not new to the American "backbone" European allies. It can be described as where you turn it around.

From the early "Prism door" to the exposure of the thief, the thief has not changed. In recent years, the Danish communication optical cable has continued to listen to the politicians of European countries; from the seventeen -year Boeing Airbus subsidy war, to tearing the skin in 2018, it is directly against the EU. Steel and aluminum products are imposed on the "232" tariffs; from the rejection of signing on the joint communiqué of the Seventh Kingdom Group, forcing the Seventh Kingdom Group in 2019 to cancel the joint bulletin, to blatantly declare that "the EU is the enemy of the United States"; from 2021, it was destroyed. The US $ 66 billion in Australian submarines in France rushed out of Afghanistan, regardless of whether the NATO Allies were in danger.

Perhaps the United States and European countries are the relationship between the ally, but this relationship has not been equal since the first day. I said in the previous comments that after the Second World War, Europe and Europe made a transaction in the ruins. The United States provided military security guarantees as a exchange. Europe recognized the necessity and necessity and necessity and necessity and necessity of the construction of European order in Europe. Reasonableness, or more straightforward, Europe needs to be attached to the United States for the protection of the United States.

For example, the Marshall plan, according to today's purchasing power conversion, the Marshall plan involved in more than 150 billion US dollars is regarded as the key to the revival of the European War by the European War. However, the American academic community generally believes that the plan is not so much of a goodwill for Europe, it is better to compete for the influence of the Soviet Union and more important to shape Europe into a dumping market for the huge excess capacity of the United States. Due to the general mobilization policies during World War II, the US factories and farms produced more than half of the world's goods. At that time, the Secretary of State Ericson repeatedly warned between 1944 and 1945 that if the new market could not be guaranteed after the war, it would be difficult to ensure that The overcapacity of the resolution will cause the United States to face the economic disaster in 1929 again.

When the national interests of the United States and Europe conflict, the United States will not be soft. In 1956, the Suez Canal crisis, British and French military involved in Egypt. In order to avoid the third world to the Soviet Union, it was also to disintegrate and refer to the vast market of the British and French colonial empire. The market initiates targeted blasting and even resorts to military threats. I remember when I was in the United Kingdom in 2012, I was quite emotional when I reviewed the history of the history of international relations, saying that this was the most humiliated moment in the modern history of Britain. He even played an example, saying that it was like "the Opium War in Chinese history." I will not comment on whether this analogy is accurate, but the Suez Canal crisis is indeed an important node for the collapse of the British colonial system. The British seems to be interrupted by the spine and quickly declined from a global great country to become the "most loyal class" in the United States.

France chose another road. The Suez Canal crisis allowed the later French President Dai Goghle to see the true face of the United States and realize that the United States would not be French reliable ally. In 1959, after Da Gogho came to power, he began to withdraw from the NATO military integration system. At the same time, he sought to establish a "European European", opened up the third road outside the United States and the Soviet Union, and across the iron curtain in 1964 to recognize the People's Republic of China.

Therefore, if we look back at this history, it is not difficult to find that the "back thorn" allies can be described as the traditional artistic energy of the United States. In a sense of not "backbone", it is "news". And the so -called "alliance relationship" is naturally unpopular, and Americans know this completely, so they will always let Europe live in a certain crisis, and to shape the threat from a certain enemy for European countries, so as to let the European countries make it, so Europeans have to swallow arrogance and exploitation from the United States. So when you return to your initial problem, the United States prohibits more energy from selling more energy to Europe, which seems to be some kind of economic benefits, because the United States does not deposit itself, but it is actually the most cruel geographical strategy. The manufacturing energy crisis has exacerbated the tension between Europe and Russia, forcing Europe to invest in the arms of the United States. In a sense, this is completely awareness. Europeans fully understand this, but Europeans can't do anything. Perhaps this is the result of the national movement attached to hegemony.

Author 丨 Zhang Siman, straight news leader, Shenzhen Satellite TV "Live Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan" special commentator

Editor 丨 Liu Ying, editor -in -chief of Shenzhen Satellite TV Direct News

- END -