Johnson visited Kyiv to continue to "arch fire". Is the Ukrainian crisis a "Faykram Islands"?

[Liu Yupeng, a special reporter in the UK, Ji Shuangcheng, Britain] After visiting Ukraine, the British Prime Minister Johnson was unwilling to fall behind. He secretly visited Kyiv on the 17th and promised a series of military assistance to Ukraine. This is also his second visit to Ukraine since his conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Johnson acknowledged on the 18th that at this "particularly critical moment ... the world began to feel tired of Ukraine." However, he said he would continue to support Ukraine to "fight against Russia." He said: "We must convey such a message to the Ukraine and the world: how important we support them, how important it is for their success."

Johnson held a talks with President Zeleki, President Zemili on the 17th. He said that the United Kingdom will continue to provide Ukraine with training plans for military equipment and large -scale military personnel, and the plan will be as fast as 10,000 military personnel for Ukraine as soon as 4 months. He said: "Through this plan, the confidence of Ukraine's victory will be strengthened, thereby changing the balance of the entire war."

On the 18th, Johnson said in an interview with British Sky News from Kyiv that he said that although the world began to be tired of Ukraine, Britain would continue to actively support Ukraine. He said, "It's important to go to Ukraine, especially at the critical moment." Ukraine is suffering, and the Russian army is advancing little by little. "Kyiv's partners need to prove that Ukraine can and will win."

"Why did Johnson rush to see Zeelianzki after the French and Defeat?" Russia "Truth" said on the 18th that Johnson did not visit Kyiv with the French leader, but immediately visited Ukraine after they just left. It is reported that Johnson rushed to Kyiv regardless of everything to prevent Macron from accessing the possible results. The French head of Italy visited Kyiv to persuade Zessky and Russia to resume negotiations in order to quickly end the war, so that Europe can breathe. But Johnson opposed this, and he tried to continue to "arch fire" for Russia and Ukraine.

After the British media related to Johnson's visit to Ukraine, many British readers left a message in the comment area of ​​the website and were angry at Ukraine in the context of Johnson's visit to the UK's economic and political crisis. In the comments on the British "Express" website, a reader said: "He is a coward. For him, visiting a conflict country is much easier than staying in China to discuss economic commitments in China."

The Washington Post stated that Mrs. Sachel faced high inflation and high domestic dissatisfaction in China, and used the French Islands (that is, the Malvinas Islands in Argentina). Now, some people say that the Ukrainian crisis is Johnson's "Fakeland Islands Time", but this is just the fantasy of desperate conservatives. "For Johnson and the Conservative Party, the terrible poll data shows that they just whistle in the night."

- END -