[Bilingual] Routine Press Conference/Regular Press Conference (2022-8-29)

August 29, 2022, Zhao Lijian, spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Host as a regular press conference

Foreignministryspokespersonzhao lijian'sregular presconceonceon august 29, 2022

1

Reporter from Shenzhen Satellite TV: According to reports, the tenth review conference of the Treaty of Non -diffused Nuclear Weapons closed at the United Nations Headquarters of New York last week, but the parties failed to reach negotiation on the results documents. what opinions do the Chinese have on this issue?

Shenzhen TV: The Tenth Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) concluded at the UN Headquarters in New York last week and states parties were unable to reach consensus on the outcome document. Do you have Any Comment on this?

Zhao Lijian: The tenth review conference of the Treaty of Non -diffused Nuclear weapons was held at the United Nations Headquarters from August 1st to 26th. This meeting was held in the context of the continuous deterioration of the global strategic security environment, the international nuclear disarmament and the non -proliferation system facing severe challenges. A comprehensive and in -depth discussion, and actively committed to achieving achievements. At the end of the conference, the conference failed to reach the results documents, and China regretted it. This once again proves that the "Treaty" mechanism is not running in vacuum. China believes that the meeting's failure to reach the results of the results does not mean that the conference fails. During the meeting, the concepts, positions and demands of all parties were constantly colliding, which was of great significance for the complicated and profound evolution of the current international situation and discussed the severe challenges facing the international nuclear non -diffusion system.

Zhao Lijian: The Tenth Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) was held from August 1 to 26 at the UN Headquarters. This conference was held at a time when the global strategic security environment keeps deteriorating and the international nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation system face severe challenges. Parties to the conference had comprehensive and in-depth discussions on disarmament, nonproliferation, and peaceful uses of nuclear energy, which form the three pillars of the NPT, and worked actively on an outcome document. It is regrettable, however, that the conference concluded without consensus on the outcome document. This once again shows that the NPT mechanism does not operate in the vacuum. China does not see the lack of an outcome document as a failure Of the conference, becaude the exchange and class of ideas, positys and concesss among parties during the meting is important force and reflecting ove n the complex and profound changes of the current international landscape and useful for jointly exploring ways to address the severe challenges facing the international non-proliferation system.会议期间，中国代表团坚持共同、综合、合作、可持续的新安全理念， He participated in various substantial work with a positive and constructive attitude, highly affirmed the status and role of the Treaty, advocated comprehensive balance to promote the three pillars of the Treaty, and proposed a new positioning of peace and development of the "Treaty" service. China emphasizes that China's nuclear strategy and nuclear policies are the most stable and continuous among the five nuclear weapons countries, and they are the most responsible. China is actively committed to promoting the international nuclear army control process, and at the same time, it will also resolutely safeguard the legitimate security interests of the country. China firmly maintains the international nuclear non -diffusion system, and has clearly opposed the wrong behavior of leaving the geopolitical interests to the non -diffusion of the nuclear. China actively promotes the use of nuclear energy international cooperation.

During the meeting, the Chinese delegation was guided by the new vision of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable global security, and participated actively and constructively in substantive work on various fronts. The Chinese delegation highly recognized the status and role of the NPT, advocated promoting the three pillars of the NPT in a comprehensive and balanced manner, and proposed the new role of the NPT in serving peace and development. The Chinese side reiterated that China has the most stable, consistent and responsible nuclear strategy and policy among the five nuclear -weapon states. China actively commits itself to advancing the international nuclear arms control process and will in the meantime firmly uphold its legitimate security interests. China firmly upholds the international nuclear non-proliferation system, and unequivocally opposes the erroneous practice of putting geopolitical interests above Non-ProLiferation Efforths. China Also Actively Promotes Inter National Cooperation on the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. China will adhere to the path of peaceful development, continue to guide the global security initiative and global development initiative proposed by President Xi Jinping as the guidance, faithfully fulfill the obligations of the Treaty, maintain the global strategic balance and stability, defend the international nuclear non -diffusion system, and support the development of development. National peaceful use of nuclear energy. We are willing to work together with all parties to continuously strengthen the universal authority and effectiveness of the Treaty, add more stability and certainty to this era of turbulence and change, and make new contributions to promoting world peace, security and development. Essence

The NPT review conference has concluded, but this is not the end of upholding the object and purpose of the NPT. China will stay committed to the path of peaceful development, continue to be guided by the Global Security Initiative and Global Development Initiative put forward by President Xi Jinping, faithfully observe obligations under the NPT, preserve global strategic balance and stability, safeguard the international nuclear non-proliferation system and support the peaceful uses of nuclear energy by developing countries. We are ready to work with all parties to enhance the universality , Authority and EECTIVENENENESS of The NPT, Add More Stability and Certering to a Time of Turbulence and Make New Contribution

China News Agency reporter: We noticed that many people have recently been deceived by Taiwanese people who have been deceived to work in Cambodia to be imprisoned, beaten, etc., which has aroused widespread attention from all walks of life. Does the Chinese embassy in Cambodia provide consular protection for these Taiwanese compatriots? What do you do?

China News Service: We noted recent revelations about people from Taiwan who are held captive and subject to beating in Cambodia after being lured to the country by job scams. This has received much attention from many social sectors. Is the Chinese embassy in Cambodia offering any Consular Protection to the Compatriots from Taiwan? What is it doing exactly?

Zhao Lijian: The Chinese government attaches great importance to and fully maintains overseas Chinese citizens' security and legitimate rights and interests including Taiwan compatriots. The Chinese Embassy in Cambodia is maintaining close communication with the Cambodian government to actively find and rescue relevant personnel. At present, the embassy has received more than 20 Taiwan compatriots for help, and has assisted Cambodia to successfully rescue some personnel. We will continue to closely follow up the case of the case. In the case of trapped Taiwan compatriots and family members, we can contact the Chinese Embassy in Cambodia for help in time.

Zhao Lijian: The Chinese government attaches great importance to and is fully committed to protecting the safety and lawful rights and interests of overseas Chinese nationals, including our compatriots from Taiwan. The Chinese embassy in Cambodia is in close communication with the Cambodian government in the ongoing search and rescue efforts. The Chinese embassy has so far received help requests from over 20 compatriots who came from Taiwan and has assisted the Cambodian side in successfully rescuing some of them. We will continue to closely follow the handling of relevant cases. Compatriots from Taiwan And their family in the next kids contase emBassy in Cambodia Promptly to Seek Help. In case of emergency, please report to the local police in time and contact the Chinese embassy in the local embassy.

We once again remind our fellow citizens to be vigilant against fake overseas job postings on the Internet, strictly abide by laws and regulations, protect themselves, and promptly report any information related to fraud and gambling. In case of an emergency outside China, please contact The Local Police Immediaately and get in touch with the chinese embassies or consulates there.

3

Bloomberg reporter: First, the launch activity of the National Aerospace Administration and the Ministry of Defense in the recent report warned that China has the ambition in the space field. What are the comments in China? Second, the United States has successfully promoted the signing of the Artemis Agreement in many countries, which is an agreement to establish rules for the establishment of space activities such as moon exploration by the United States. What position China does? Third, what is the progress of China -Russia's initiative to support the construction of the International Moon Scientific Research Station?

Bloomberg: Do you have any comment on the upcoming NASA launch and also some accusations in a recent Pentagon report that warns of China's hegemonic ambitions in space? Secondly, I'd like to ask what is the Chinese government's position on the US's success in getting countries to sign up for the Artemis Accords, which is the Washington-based initiative to create rules for activities on the moon, but also elsewhere in space. Finally, I would like to ask what, if any, progress has been made on the China -Russia initiative to support the interior lunar research station, if you have any updates on that? Zhao Lijian: Please ask the relevant departments in the space cooperation you mentioned. What I can tell you is that foreign air is not a arena in various countries, but an important area for win -win cooperation. Exploring the use of extra -spaces with peace is the common cause of all human beings, and we should seek benefits for all human beings. China has always been committed to peaceful use of external air, maintaining external air safety, and extensive cooperation with countries. China also welcomes more countries to make progress in this regard. We are willing to work with all countries to work together to promote peaceful use of external and empty causes, better promote economic development and social progress of various countries, and make greater contributions to promoting the establishment of a community of human destiny.

Zhao Lijian: I would like to refer you to the competent authorities for these specific questions about outer space cooperation. What I can say is that outer space is not a wrestling ground, but an important field for win-win cooperation. The exploration and peaceful uses of outer space is humanity's common endeavor and should benefit all. China is committed to the peaceful uses of outer space, security of outer space and extensive cooperation with all countries. China also welcomes progress by more countries in this area. We are ready to continue to work with other countries, advance the peaceful uses of outer space, better promote economic development and social progress of all countries, and make greater contribution to building a community with a shared future for mankind.

4

Reuters reporter: Last Sunday, two US warships passed the "international waters" of the Taiwan Strait. On the same day, US White House officials said that this was "very in line with" a Chinese policy and the pursuit of free opening of the Indo -Indian region. What is China's comment?

Reuters: On Sunday, two US warships passed through international waters in the Taiwan Strait, a move that a White House official described in the same day as very consistent with the US's one-China policy and its policy of seeking a free and open Indo- Pacific. DOES the Foreign Ministry have any comments? Regarding American warships, the Eastern theater followed up and monitored the whole process, and everything was mastered.

Zhao Lijian: Spokesperson for the PLA Eastern Theater Command has responded to this. The Eastern Theater Command conducted security tracking and monitoring of the US warships’ passage in the whole course, and had all movements of the US warships under control.

U.S. warships frequently show off their force under the guise of "freedom of navigation". This is not a promise of free and openness, but a provocation of "rampant freedom", and deliberate destruction of regional peace and stability.

US warships frequently flex muscles in the name of exercising freedom of navigation. This is not about keeping the region free and open. This is provocation aimed at “freedom of trespassing” and it constitutes deliberate sabotage of regional peace and stability.

China once again urged the United States to stop blurming, hollowed out, and distorting a Chinese principle, abide by the basic criteria for respecting other countries' sovereignty and territorial integrity and non -interference in the internal affairs, and effectively abide by the three joint communiqué regulations of China and China and the United States. Trouble and stability maker.

China once again urges the US side to stop fudging, hollowing out and distorting the one-China principle, observe basic norms in international relations including respecting other countries' sovereignty and territorial integrity and non-interference in their internal affairs, earnestly abide by the one -China Principle and Stipulations of the Three China-us Joint Commiquués, and Stop Being A Trouble Maker For Peace and Stability in the Taiwan Strait.

5

Agence France -Presse: In addition to the people of Taiwan being trapped in Southeast Asian countries such as Cambodia and engaging in telecommunications fraud, we saw reports that people from mainland China and Hong Kong were trapped. Does China receive help from these citizens? What specific measures China takes to help them?

AFP: In addition to reports on people from Taiwan trapped in Cambodia and other Southeast Asian countries and forced to operate phone scams, we've also seen reports that there are people from Hong Kong as well as the mainland. I just wanted to ask the foreign ministry if you had received any request for help from people from Hong Kong and the mainland, and if you could share more details on what concrete steps are being taken to help these people.赵立坚：我刚才已经介绍了有关情况。 I can disclose to you again. I found an account called "A Children I Want to Go Home" on the Weibo platform. The account sent a information to my personal Weibo many times, and I transferred the relevant information to the Chinese embassy in Cambodia. Under the cooperation between the Chinese Embassy in Cambodia and the Cambodian police, the Chinese citizen was finally understood and rescued, and had returned to China. Please pay more attention to such cases. If there is a relevant situation, you can ask for help from the Consular Protection Center of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or directly to the Chinese embassies and consulates in Cambodia.

Zhao Lijian: In addition to the details I just provided, let me also share with you a personal story. A Weibo account with the alias “一位想回家的孩子” (a child who wants to go home) messaged my personal Weibo account several times asking for help. I relayed the messages to our embassy in Cambodia. With the concerted efforts of the Chinese embassy and Cambodian police, this Chinese citizen was finally rescued and has returned safely to China. I kindly ask all the journalists here to watch out for similar cases. If you come across such cases, you could contact the consular protection center of the Chinese foreign ministry or our embassies and consulates in Cambodia and other countries.

6

Phoenix Satellite TV reporter: Berry, a senior representative of the EU diplomacy and security policy, previously called "Taiwan is a small country", but the EU spokesman's office claimed that this was a translation problem. He did not say that before. What is China's comment?

Phoenix TV: The EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell had reportedly said that “Taiwan is a small country”, but later the EU spokesperson's office said it was a mistranslation that didn't reflect the High Representative's view. Do you have any comments?

Zhao Lijian: China has noticed reports.

Zhao lijian: We have noted Relevant Reports. I would like to emphasize that the meaning of a Chinese principle is clear and clear. There is only one China in the world. Taiwan is part of China. There is no fuzzy space on this big and wrong issue.

Let me stress that the definition of the one-China principle is crystal clear, i.e., there is only one China in the world, Taiwan is part of China, and the government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of china. There is no room for ambivalence on this major matter of principle.

The Chinese side hopes that the European side will continue to abide by a Chinese principle, effectively respect China's core interests and major concerns, and abide by their commitments on the issue of Taiwan -related issues to avoid affecting China -Europe relations and mutual trust between both parties.

We hope the EU side will continue to follow the one-China principle, respect China’s core interests and major concerns, and reflect its commitment in concrete actions on Taiwan-related issues to avoid affecting China-EU relations and mutual trust.

7

Surging news reporter: Recently, the British "Times" article quoted the news of the former head of the National Network Security Center and British intelligence officials in the former National Cyber ​​Security Center of the United Kingdom, confirming that the British government found that Huawei did not constitute a national security threat in 2019, and willing to cooperate with Huawei cooperation with Huawei Later, the United States sent the Asian Affairs Director of the Presidential National Security Council to the UK. Without any technical argument to deny the British evaluation, it roared to the British representative for 5 hours and forcibly asked the UK to participate in the siege of Huawei. What is China's comment?

The Paper: A recent article in British newspaper The Sunday Times citing the former head of the UK's National Cyber ​​Security Center and intelligence officials confirmed that in 2019, after the British government determined that Huawei does not constitute a national security threat and was ready to engage in cooperation with it, the US sent then US National Security Council's director on Asia to the UK, who “shouted at” the UK side “for five hours”, demanding that the UK join them in suppressing Huawei without any compelling technical arguments that undermined The uk's analysis. What's China's Comment?

Zhao Lijian: I noticed the report. This is simply sensational and you can make a movie. The facts disclosed by the British media once again showed that the United States forced Britain to abandon Huawei, completely due to the political manipulation of Chinese high -tech companies. The so -called "national security" and "5G technology risk" is just the guise of the United States to cover up its insidious plot.

Zhao Lijian: I have noted the article. This is simply shocking and like a story for a movie. What has been revealed by the British media is further proof that the US's coercion of the UK into giving up Huawei is all part of the political manipulation aimed at suppressing Chinese hi-tech companies. The so-called “national security” and “5G technology risks” are merely pretexts used by the US to mask its sinister intention.我还注意到，这篇文章指出，英国政府禁用华为The decision has caused the British itself to suffer huge losses. The British 5G technology construction will be postponed for 3 years, and it will cost at least 2 billion pounds from the British network to remove all Huawei 5G devices from the British network in 2027. Who is buying for the selfish and domineering of the United States, everyone on the earth knows.

I also noted that the article points out that the UK government's decision to ban Huawei comes at a huge cost as it would delay the country's 5G rollout by three years and cost it at least £2 billion to remove all Huawei 5G equipment from its networks by 2027. I Believe the World Can See Clearly WHO Is Actually Footing The Bill for The us's Selfishness and Bullying Tactics.

The above facts once again show that the US move is generalization and abuse of national security concepts and politically politically, this approach is unpopular. The so -called "clean network" sold in the United States is just a "dirty network" that suppress the alien. In the face of the interests of the United States, even close allies like Britain will be coerced and bully. The international community should see the hypocrisy and false narrative of the United States.

These facts show once again that the US's move to stretch and abuse the concept of national security and politicize technological issues is deeply unpopular. The so-called “clean network” peddled by the US is really a “dirty network” designed to repress anyone who disagrees with them. If the US's self-serving calculations so dictate, even a close ally like the UK can be subject to coercion and bullying. The international community should see clearer the US's hypocrisy behind all its false narratives.

8

Agence France -Presse reporter: According to reports, British Foreign Minister Tellas said that if he was elected Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, he may formally label China to label China. What does China respond to this?

AFP: We've seen reports that the UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss will likely label China “an official threat” if she becomes Prime Minister. Do you have any response to this?赵立坚：我们对英国内政、包括保守党党首选举不Comment, not interested. I want to persuade individual politicians in the UK to talk about China and the so -called "Chinese threat theory" at every turn. This is an irresponsible statement and cannot solve the problem of Britain itself.

Zhao Lijian: We do not comment on and have no interest in the UK's internal affairs, including the Conservative Party leadership election. Our message for certain British politicians is that finding fault with China or hyping up the so-called “China threat” is an IrresPonsible Thing to do and will not solve the uk's own problem.

9

Reporter of Tokyo Broadcasting Corporation in Japan: Recently, a video of Chinese private drones flying to Kinmen Island has been circulated online. What is China's comment?

TBS: Recently on the internet, there are many videos of privated drones flying from the mainland to the jinmen island to take pictures. Do you have any comments on this?

Zhao Lijian: I also saw the video. China's drones fly on China's territory, which is not worth a fuss.

Zhao lijian: I have seen the videos too. Chinese Drones Flying Over China ’s Territory — What’ s there to be surprised at?

10

CCTV reporter: According to reports, China criticized the cooperation between the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the Australian nuclear submarine in the "Non -diffusion Nuclear Treaty Treaty." What is China's comment?

CCTV: It is reported that China criticized the AUKUS nuclear submarine cooperation during the NPT review conference and worked to include the matter in the draft final document. Do you have any comment?

Zhao Lijian: China resolutely opposes the cooperation of the United States and the United States and the United States, Britain, and Australia. During this review conference, many countries, including China, expressed concern about this cooperation, believed that it violated the purpose and purpose of the Treaty of the Non -Display Nuclear weapons, impacted the international atomic energy agency to ensure the supervision system, and constitute a serious risk of nuclear proliferation risk Essence Driven by China, the conference conducted a serious and fully discussion on this issue, and negotiated to form the content of the draft of the final document, especially "the importance of disclosure and transparent dialogue on the naval nuclear power stack." This fully shows that the international community has widespread concern about the cooperation between the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States, and the United States, and the United States, and the establishment of an open and inclusive intergovernmental discussion process is completely reasonable.

Zhao Lijian: China firmly opposes the nuclear submarine cooperation between the US, the UK and Australia. During this review conference, China and many other countries expressed concern over their cooperation and viewed it as a violation of the object and purpose of the NPT which could impact the IAEA's safeguard and monitoring system and pose grave nuclear proliferation risks. As called for by China, the conference had serious and thorough discussions on this issue and agreed on the content included in the draft final document on this topic, which, in particular, says the conference “notes the importance of transparent and open dialogue” on the topic of “naval nuclear propulsion”. This speaks volumes about the widespread concerns of the international community over the AUKUS nuclear submarine cooperation and the legitimacy of China's proposal to establish an open And inclusive Inter-Governmental Discussion Process in this Regard. The us, the uk and Australia Had No reason to obStrut IT.11

Papong News Agency: Affected by strong seasonal wind and rainfall, the Pakistani floods have killed more than a thousand people and tens of millions of people were affected. What does China respond to this?

Associated Press of Pakistan: Over 1,000 people have died and more than tens of millions of people aFFECED from PARTS CAUSED MONSOON RAINS in Pakistan. Do You Have ANY Reveonse?

Zhao Lijian: We have seen many related news recently, especially the video about Pakistan's flooding, which is distressed and shocking. As a all -weather strategic partner, China and Pakistan are real friends who are in trouble and good brothers who are together. Since the Pakistani flood, the Chinese side has always been concerned about the safety of the people in the Pakistani area, and has suffered from the difficulty facing Pakistan. At the beginning of the disaster, Wang Yi's State Councilor and Foreign Minister expressed condolences to Pakistan Foreign Minister Bravar. Through the China -Pakistan Economic Corridor Social Livelihood Cooperation Framework, China provided 4,000 tents, 50,000 blankets, and 50,000 waterproof tents and other reserve materials provided by Pakistani. In view of the further development of the disaster and based on the needs of Pakistan, China has decided to add a batch of humanitarian assistance including 25,000 tents and other Pakistani people in urgent need for materials. The Chinese Red Cross will also provide US $ 300,000 emergency assistance to the Pakistan Red Crescent. The Quanba Chinese Enterprise Association donated 15 million rupees to the Prime Minister of Pakistan Flood Relief Fund.

Zhao Lijian: We have seen many news stories about the floods, especially videos of the devastation the floods have caused in Pakistan. They are heart-wrenching and staggering. China and Pakistan are all-weather strategic cooperative partners and true friends and good brothers sharing weal and woe. Since Pakistan was hit by the floods, our thoughts have been with the people in the affected areas. We feel deeply for the Pakistani side in this difficult time. State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi expressed sympathy to Pakistani Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari upon learning the news of the floods. Under the social and livelihood cooperation framework of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, China has provided 4,000 tents, 50,000 blankets and 50,000 pieces of waterproof tarp to Pakistan. They have been delivered to the frontline of Disaster RELIEF. In Light of the Situation on the GROUND and Based on Pakistan's Needs, China Has Decided to PROVIDE An AdDitional Batch of Emergee ncy humanitarian supplies including 25,000 tents and other supplies in dire need. The Red Cross Society of China will provide USD 300,000 in emergency cash assistance to the Pakistan Red Crescent Society. The All-Pakistan Chinese Enterprises' Association has donated PKR 15 million to the Prime Minister's flow relieve function. We will not forget that after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, the Pakistani brothers reached out for the first time, took out all the tents in the inventory and sent it to the Chinese disaster area, which moved the Chinese people. In the face of the flood, we also stood with the Pakistani people of the brothers. In the next step, China will further strengthen cooperation with Pakistan in the fields of disaster prevention and mitigation and responding to global climate change to provide more help for Pakistan to fight floods and post -disaster reconstruction. The Chinese Embassy in Pakistan and the Pakistani Embassy in China is also contacting relevant enterprises and all walks of life to raise funds. We believe that the Pakistani people will be able to defeat the floods as soon as possible and rebuild their homes.

A ruthless disaster can bring out the best of humanity. We won't forget that in the wake of the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008, the brotherly Pakistani people rushed to our assistance and sent all their tents in reserve to the stricken area in China. The Chinese people were deeply moved. Now as the Pakistani people grapple with the floods, we are standing with them. Going forward, China will continue to enhance cooperation with Pakistan in disaster prevention and mitigation and global climate response and provide more assistance to Pakistan in its flood relief efforts and post-disaster reconstruction. The Chinese embassy in Pakistan and the Pakistani embassy in China are seeking help and donation from companies and people from various sectors. We believe the Pakistani people will surely overcome the disaster and rebuild their homes soon.12

"Global Times" reporter: According to reports, on the 24th, the US State Department's Global Contact Center issued a report on the 24th, saying that the Chinese government created and distributed false information related to Xinjiang through various propaganda methods, trying to manipulate and dominate the global narrative. What is China's comment?

Global Times: According to reports, the Global Engagement Center of the US Department of State released a report on August 24 falsely alleging that the Chinese government has sought to create and spread disinformation on Xinjiang with various publicity tactics in an attempt to manipulate and dominate global Discourse on xinjiang. Do you have any comments?

Zhao Lijian: Relevant reports slander the Chinese side to manipulate public opinion with false information. Relevant agencies in the US State Department are in the name of "global contact" and the facts of "propaganda penetration", which is the source of false information and the command post of "cognitive operations".

Zhao Lijian: The report falsely accuses China of using disinformation to manipulate public opinion on Xinjiang. This is like nothing but a thief crying “stop thief”. Propaganda and infiltration veiled as “global engagement” — that's what this center of the US Department of State Actually Doees. It is a hotbed of disinformation and a command center for Cognitive warfare. China has always been a victim of false information. Xinjiang is the hardest hit area for the world's false information offense in China. For a period of time, the United States has continued to make and speculates that the so -called Xinjiang "racial extinction", "forced labor", and "anti -human crime" and other century lies were continuously planted and hyped up. In this regard, US government officials have long exposed their hearts. Some former senior officials in the United States and some diplomats in China have admitted that the United States "actually does not care what Xinjiang ethnic minorities at all", "knowing Xinjiang without problems", "just use hype in Xinjiang issues to create turmoil. Broken China from the inside. "

China has long been a victim of disinformation. China's Xinjiang, in particular, has been under heavy attack from the US's worldwide campaign to spread disinformation against China. For quite some time, the US has propagated lies of the century about Xinjiang such as “genocide ”, “forced labor” and “crimes against humanity” to serve the US's sinister scheme of using Xinjiang to contain China. Even some US government officials have admitted it several times. Former senior US officials and US diplomats posted in China have told people that the US never cared about ethnic minorities in Xinjiang and was “very clear that nothing is wrong about Xinjiang”, and that the US just wanted to play up issues about Xinjiang to “foment unrest” and destabilize China from within.

In fact, the false propaganda of the United States involved in Xinjiang is nothing new, and their means have been disclosed several times. The first is to encourage American academic institutions, think tanks, and non -governmental organizations to continuously organize the so -called falsely -related "research report" to discredit the policy of governing China's governance, to buy and forge the so -called "human rights violations of human rights" in Xinjiang. The second is to instruct news agencies managed by the US International Media Department to use dozens of languages ​​to produce news reports and "propaganda materials" about the so -called "racial extinction" and "forced labor" in Xinjiang, and coordinate the reports of the allies of media agencies. The third is to provide "technology shares" for the US Internet media. On the one hand, weaken and block the true information of Xinjiang released by China. On the other hand, it disseminates false information about the false information of anti -China forces. In this lie chain, the so -called "scholars", media, the Internet, and officials of the United States are the lying raw material suppliers and consumers, and the false information products involved in Xinjiang have become an excuse for the US government's sanctions and pressure interference in China. Essence

In fact, the US's disinformation campaign on Xinjiang is nothing new and the methods it uses have been debunked many times. First, the US has encouraged US academic institutes, think tanks and NGOs to keep fabricating so-called “research papers” flooded with false accusations on Xinjiang to smear China's Xinjiang policy. They have bribed witnesses and fabricated evidence to justify the so-called charge of “human rights violations” in Xinjiang. Second, the US has instructed news agencies overseen by the US Agency for Global Media to produce fake news reports and “propaganda materials” about “genocide” and “forced labor” in Xinjiang in dozens of languages ​​and coordinated with media networks in US ally countries to reprint such “products”. Third, the US has heavily financed online media outlets for them to weaken and block true information about Xinjiang released by the Chinese side while providing technical assistance for anti-China forces to spread disinformation related to the region. In this manufacturing chain of lies, the so-called scholars and certain media, the cyberspace and government agencies of the US both supply and consume these raw materials of the lies. The end product, disinformation related to Xinjiang, is then used by the US Government as a Pretext to SANCTION, Pressure and Interfere in China. The most afraid of liemakers and false information disseminators is the facts and the truth. At present, Xinjiang's social security, stability, continuous development of development, and living in the people are the best and most powerful counterattack on the promotion of false information in the United States. No matter how many lies in the United States, the United States can not blind the eyes of the world, it can't destroy the harmony and stability of Xinjiang, and it can't hide the voices of justice that the international community supports China. It will only accelerate the bankruptcy of the United States' own reputation.

The manufacturers of lies and propagators of disinformation fear most about facts and truth. Xinjiang is a safe and stable place now and enjoys sustained and sound development, and the people there are living happy and fulfilling lives. This is the best and most powerful rebuttal to the US's disinformation campaign against Xinjiang. No matter how many lies the US produces, they will not fool the people across the world, nor will they bring down Xinjiang's harmony and stability. They will not drown out the voice for justice in support of China from The International Community. in Fact, what the us does will only banks own credibility at an event faster page.13

"Beijing Daily" reporter: According to reports, during the review conference of the Treaty of Non -diffusion of the Nuclear Weapons, the policy issues of nuclear weapons have attracted much attention from the majority of nuclear weapons. The final document draft once included the content of the nuclear weapons countries that did not use nuclear weapons policies first, but there was no relevant expression in the last version of the draft. What is China's comment?

Beijing Daily: According to reports, during the NPT review conference, the issue of policies concerning the use of nuclear weapons received wide attention from non-nuclear-weapon states. The draft final document once included content about calling on nuclear-weapon states to commit Tono-FIRST-Use of Nuclear Weapons, But the Last DRAFT Contained No Related Expression. What's China's Comment?

Zhao Lijian: How the nuclear weapons countries think of the role of nuclear weapons in national security policies, what kind of nuclear strategies and nuclear policies are formulated and implemented, related to international peace and security, and related to the effectiveness of the Treaty of Nuclear Weapons. From the first day of owning nuclear weapons, China has always adhered to the policy of using nuclear weapons at any time and under any circumstances. China is the only country in the five -core country to make the above commitment. During this review conference, none -free weapons countries generally called on all nuclear weapons countries to pursue not to use policies first, and believe that this is of great significance to reducing nuclear risks and improving the international security environment. UN Secretary -General Gutres also publicly issued such a appeal during the meeting. In the final document consultation, at the request of China, the relevant content of "No First" was written.

Zhao Lijian: How nuclear-weapon states see the role of nuclear weapons in their national security policy and what kind of nuclear strategy and policy they make and implement bear on international peace and security and the efficacy of the NPT. Since the first day of possession of nuclear weapons, China has pledged to “no first use” of nuclear weapons at any time and under any circumstances. China is the only one among the five nuclear-weapon states to have made this pledge. During this review conference, non-nuclear -weapon states jointly called on all nuclear-weapon states to adopt the no-first-use policy, which they believe is vital for reducing nuclear risks and improving the international security environment. UN Secretary-General António Guterres made the same call twice publicly during the conference. In the consultation process for the draft final document, content about no-first-use was once included upon China's proposal.令人遗憾的是，个别核武器国家及其盟友利用协商一致规则阻挡大会成果文件草案写入"Don't use it first" content. On the one hand, these countries have been on the issue of nuclear control "China threat theory" and "Chinese responsibility theory", claiming to support the reduction of nuclear risks, and on the other hand, they are not preferential to use their policies to fully expose their hypocrisy. What I want to emphasize is that in terms of reducing the role of nuclear weapons in national security policies, nuclear weapons countries have important responsibilities, and their allies should also play an active role.

Regrettably, a certain nuclear-weapon state and its allies blocked the inclusion of the content about no-first-use in the draft outcome document by taking advantage of the consensus rule. On one hand, these countries hype up the “China threat” and “China's responsibility” narratives on the issue of nuclear arms control and claim to be supportive of reducing nuclear risks, but on the other hand, they bluntly reject the no-first-use policy. This says a lot about their hypocrisy. I would like to stress that when it comes to reducing the role of nuclear weapons in national security policy, nuclear-weapon states shoulder important responsibilities and their allies should also play a positive role.外交部发言人办公室

- END -