In this matter, I hope that the U.S. motivation is pure

Recently, the severe high temperature droughts that swept more than half of the northern hemisphere have continued. The latest research of the World Climate Champion Organization believes that climate change caused by human factors has increased the incidence of this high temperature at least 10 times. This drought is also further disrupting the supply chain and pushing up food and energy prices. It reminds people to deal with the urgency of climate change.

At the same time, many European countries, including Germany, France, the Netherlands, Denmark, etc., have recently restarted or let go of coal electricity quietly. For example, it is undoubtedly a setback. It should be said that this is also a large choice for Europe. The United States Latinians initiated "extreme sanctions" against Russia and wished to break all the Russian energy pipelines. The basic life of the people, "everyone rushes coal."

The goal of reducing emission reduction has to be understood in the basic people's livelihood, which is understandable; but on the other hand, such a situation is completely avoided. If you can maintain a peaceful and stable development environment, why? If you can resist cold war thinking and camp confrontation, why?

As the initiator of the Russian -Ukraine conflict, Washington seems to have reacted indifferently and does not provide any substantial help. Instead, it has recently accused China of being active: on the other hand, it is deafness to the European energy crisis. "On the one hand, it was holding a loudspeaker to discredit China’ s countermeasures on Perosi, and even slandered China ’s suspension of climate change with the United States to“ punish the world ”. This contrast itself shows that "climate change" is from Washington, but it is just a stick in its hand.

On the issue of climate change, Washington's motivation has never been simple. According to the British "Financial Times" report, the new rules of climate information proposed by the US Securities Regulatory Commission will actually put a large part of the global business community under the supervision of the United States, thereby raising extraterritorial law to a "new level". Washington on the surface is wearing noble moral coats, but what is calculated in my heart is to use the global crisis to control the right to formulate global rules and standards, form a global carbon emissions pattern. The industrialization process of China and Big China.

Because of the incorrect mind, people see that Washington's standard line in response to climate change is extremely flexible: when it needs "bleeding" of other developing countries, it holds high flags, claiming that this is "the most important in the world in the world. One thing "to make various" negotiating methods "want to put on unreasonable goals for other countries; when it needs to maintain its own private interests, climate issues are no longer" the most important thing ", such as trade protection Um, with the "Xinjiang issue" as an excuse to sanction Chinese photovoltaic companies, hindering the development of new energy global energy.

While "singing high -profile" while "dragging the legs", Washington is a true portrayal of the problem of climate change. The reason why the United States has repeatedly repeatedly repeatedly reached the root of the "Kyoto Protocol" and "Paris Agreement" is to take the reducing reduction tools instead of purpose. Texas, the United States recently announced that 10 companies that have resisted fossil fuel "pull blacks"; the Supreme Court of the United States has recently passed a decision to limit the power of the US Environmental Protection Agency to control greenhouse gas emissions. Criticizing other countries, no one shouted more than Washington; it was the turn to perform their own responsibilities, and no one was buried lower than Washington's head.

Some countries use their mouths to reduce emissions, and some countries use hand reducing and emission reduction. The huge differences in behavior have caused the difference between the actual effects. China has always adhered to the promise and never opened a short check. The contributions made in the fields of energy saving, improving energy efficiency, development of renewable energy, transportation, and architecture basically accounted for 30%-50%of the global total. China was in 2021. Green energy investment is more than 100 billion US dollars higher than the entire North America. As a large manufacturing country, China is currently less than half of the per capita carbon emissions. The American media also acknowledged that the "ridicule" from China made Americans feel "tingling".

What we want to say is that in response to the problem of climate change, the recognized students in the world in the United States are not eligible to find the stubble of excellent students. China has always been a global actionistist and stem family. It is hoped that the United States will also have a better motivation on this issue, rather than setting up cannons, decibels, and personal gain every day.

This article is the "Global Times" social commentary. Original title: deal with climate change.

- END -