India still wants to borrow the US system?Indian scholars warn: Don't be led by the United States like a fool

According to the "Beijing Commercial Daily" report, Indian Foreign Minister said during his visit to Thailand that any act of retention of the "four -way security dialogue mechanism" is "unilateralism". Efforts to "exercise veto." Obviously, Su Jiesheng was endorsement for the United States, and at the same time hit China. In this regard, a spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs pointed out that China ’s position on the“ four -sided mechanism ”is consistent and clear. China has reiterated that in today's era, the political circle is unpopular, violated the trend, and there is no future.

In fact, when Su Jiesheng made the above statement, he should explain to the international media to explain the true essence of the so -called "Quartet security dialogue mechanism" and what have this political circle have done since its establishment? As we all know, the so -called "Quartet security dialogue mechanism" led by the United States and the participation of India, Japan, and Australia is itself a political interest group that the United States attempts to curb China's rise. More importantly, the United States also sought to establish the "Asia -Pacific version of NATO" by the United States. Su Jiesheng does not know about this.

Obviously, the original intention of India's participation in the Quartet Alliance was to try to fight against China with the help of the alliance, so as to take a little cheap on the issue of the China -India border. Therefore, the tension that Su Jiesheng tried to put the Quartet Alliance to the region was blamed on China's opposition to the alliance. This is purely a concept of stealing. Therefore, Su Jiesheng's related remarks were also refuted by the Chinese side, which is also an inevitable result.

In fact, the Quartet Alliance is a political tool that the United States uses to provoke the confrontation between big powers. The existence of the alliance has the adverse effects of the regional situation. Not only does China oppose it, but the entire Asia -Pacific region is almost opposed to it. Therefore, the United States tries to use the existing framework of the alliance to win South Korea and ASEAN countries to copy a military organization similar to the Asia -Pacific version of NATO in Europe. However, the Sifang Alliance has been established for several years, and there are still only the founding member states of the United States, Japan and India and Australia. This is enough to explain: this small political circle full of cold war thinking is unpopular because of violation of the trend.

It is not conducive to regional prosperity and development by knowing the small political circle established by the United States. However, in order to rely on the influence of the United States, India enhanced its confidence to fight against China, which not only became the vassal of the United States in the framework of the Sifang Alliance, but also participated in the so -called "Middle East Sifang Alliance" in the United States. It can be seen that although India has repeatedly been damaged by the US bullying policy, it has also been very vigilant for the United States. However, in order to rely on the influence of the U.S. Yuwei to discharge China's rise, its foreign policy is still continuing to fall to the United States.

To this end, India came to the United States soldiers and held joint military exercises near the Sino -Indian border to try to assist the United States to open the second front of China to put pressure on China to add more bargaining chips to the China -India border negotiations. However, if Su Jiesheng's mind is more rational, he should be able to see what the United States has done in Afghanistan and Ukraine to see the sinister intention of the United States to attract India. Obviously, the United States is not going to help India, but to provoke the battle between China and India.

New Delhi's decision makers are unwilling to admit that India colludes the United States' harmfulness against China for its own political interests. However, many critics and scholars in India have long been tired of upgrading military cooperative relations between the United States and India. According to the above -Guan news report, the well -known Indian critic Plaosade wrote in the media a few days ago, warning that the Modi government "the United States is provoking conflicts because it is anxious about China's economic development. Hold your nose. "

Plaosard also said in the article, "No country in the world is perfect, and China is no exception. But if another country forms a paranoid attitude and trys to provoke it, it is very dangerous from various perspectives." Essence Obviously, if India follows the United States to provoke China, once China and the United States have conflicts, India will be difficult to put themselves out. Therefore, India seeks an attempt to "borrow the United States" in itself a very dangerous move. To this end, Parazad reminds the Modi government "Can New Delhi be mature when talking about China"?

Although there are some contradictions in India and China, such as ideological differences and border disputes. However, the common interests between the two countries are obviously more different. What's more, for India, interaction with China is more reliable than the United States. Regarding this, even the Indian Foreign Minister Su Jiesheng had to admit that "there are many reasons for China and India, which can walk together, which is in line with the interests of the two countries." Therefore, Hindu scholars reminded New Delhi to need "mature points" when dealing with Sino -Indian relations, because China -India and China and India can create the "Asian Century". Conversely, the two large population countries in Asia can only be defeated, so that the United States will have the opportunity to gain profit from it.

- END -