How are the international criminal courts that the United States hates disgust?

Author:Caney Captain Time:2022.08.09

Duterte, who has just stepped down as President of the Philippines, was in trouble.

In the middle of last month, the International Criminal Court asked the Philippine government to restart the investigation of Duterte's appointment with Duterte, and the crime was still scary: anti -human crime.

This crime can be said to be the nightmare of the former state leaders. Anyone who has been sentenced to anti -human crime is basically "not good", such as:

Former Iraqi President Saddam was accused of killing 148 local Shiites villagers in Dujar Village in 1982, committing crimes such as anti -human crimes and being sentenced to death in 2006 and executed;

Former Charian President Hussein Habre was accused of at least 40,000 opponents during the administration, and more than 200,000 ordinary citizens had been imprisoned or abused by the secret service department. Dakar's African Special Court sentenced for life imprisonment for crimes of anti -human and war;

Former Libya's highest leader Gaddafi was accused of "large -scale" and "systematic" attacks on the security forces in 2011, which caused at least 10,000 Libyan deaths, committing anti -human crimes, and also Before he could go to court, he was killed.

Former Guatemala President Rios Monte was accused of slaughtering 1,771 Aboriginal people during the administration from 1982 to 1983, and was sentenced to 80 years of prison for clan slaughter and anti -human crime in May 2013.

The International Criminal Court buckled such a big hat for Duterte. It seems to want to be dead. What did Duterte do?

Anti -drug.

During the period of Duterte's administration, he strongly hit drug crimes in China. Drug crimes in the Philippines are quite rampant. Drug trafficking groups have been in the Philippines for decades, and they are deeply ingrained. Therefore, the intensity of older drug sweeping action is very high, and it was once called the "anti -drug war" by the outside world.

It was impossible to have no casualties in such a high -intensity anti -drug war. After a few years of anti -drug sweeping, about 120,000 drug -related personnel in the Philippines were arrested, and thousands of drug -related personnel died in anti -drug operations.

Due to the extensive implication of the anti -drug war, it affected the interests of some individuals, organizations, and even the ruling interest groups. Duterte's anti -drug operation was gradually shaped by public opinion into a massacre.

In addition, the position of Lao Du's "pro -China" made the United States and Europe quite dissatisfied, and Western society began to pay special attention to the Philippines' anti -drug operation. Some human rights organizations began to condemn. Even the traditional allies in the United States were the Ubama leads Obama condemned Duterte's inhumane, and were returned to "dogs raised" by Duterte. It can be said that it was very rigid.

In February 2018, the International Court of Criminal Court informed the Philippine Government to conduct a "preliminary investigation" of whether the anti -drug criminal actions led by Duterte.

Even if the President's face is not given, Duterte is afraid of investigation by the International Criminal Court?

Within a few days, the Philippine Ministry of Foreign Affairs notified the United Nations in writing the decision to officially withdraw from the International Criminal Court. In March of the following year, the Philippines officially withdrawn from the International Criminal Court, and said it decided to "oppose the position of human rights politics and human rights as a weapon."

However, the International Criminal Court bites Lao Du without letting him go. He has repeatedly co -human rights observation organizations and the United Nations Human Rights Council, asking the Philippine government to investigate Duterte's "anti -human crimes". The Philippines has been "retreating" for four years, and the International Criminal Court still refused to let Duterte.

Is this persistence on justice? Or do you choose soft persimmons?

1

As we all know, civil disputes are tried by the Civil Court of the Court, and criminal cases are tried by the court's criminal court. Who will be tried by the transnational crime? Not to mention that some crimes are difficult to define with ordinary criminal crimes, such as racial extinction, anti -humanity, etc.

Hitler has killed tens of millions of people in so many countries. Could it be trial in each country? Even if time permits, it is only trial, and foreign countries ignore it? The Rwida Holocaust killed one million people in two months. How can the local court trial?

Therefore, the war between humans has spawned a special demand: the International Criminal Court, which needs to establish a huge organization with universal jurisdiction worldwide to punish those enemies of all humanity.

As early as 1919 in "Versailles Peace Treaty", there was a preliminary vision of establishing a special criminal court. Many clauses in the treaty and the treaty cannot be implemented, and the special criminal courts have been put on hold after signing the contract indefinitely.

After World War II, Nuremberg and the Far East International Military Court opened the first river of international criminal trials. Although these two courts were temporary, a trial of crimes against a specific area and a specific time, in order to establish a permanent international criminal judicial institution, It has laid a solid foundation and allows people to see the possibility of establishing an international criminal court.

(Address of Far East International Military Court -Former Army Building, Tokyo, Japan)

In 1947, the United Nations General Assembly asked the International Law Commission to draft the draft "violation of human peace and security crimes" and the "International Criminal Court Statistics" draft. In 1950, the Federal University established a draft of the "Establishment of the International Criminal Court Convention".

However, the international political situation during the Cold War has made this effort still without results. The two camps are comprehensively opposed. Both parties believe that the other party should bring private goods in international law, which is not good for themselves, so this shelved is 40 years.

Until 1989, during the Special UN General Assembly of that year, Trinida and Dubago proposed the establishment of an international criminal court for anti -drug issues, and then the United University requested the International Law Commission to prepare for the report. In the second year, the report of the United University's submitted by the International Law Commission was not limited to anti -drug problems, but expanded the scope to criminal crimes. The report was positively responded by the United University. As a result, the International Law Commission began to draft a draft of a comprehensive international criminal court without clear authorization, and was finally completed in 1994.

At this time, the Soviet Union had disintegrated, the Cold War has become history, and the international environment of the establishment of an international criminal court has also been formed.

In 1995, the United University established the Special Committee of the International Criminal Court, and the following year, the establishment of an international criminal court preparatory committee was established to conduct a detailed study of the draft of the rules. On the basis of this, it was decided to hold a diplomatic conference in Rome in 1998 to pass the rules.

On June 15, 1998, in accordance with the agenda set determined by the decision of the 160th (1997) of the United Nations, the United Nations established the International Criminal Court of Full -right Delegates in Rome. Representatives of 161 countries and regions around the world, 17 international organizations and international organizations More than 250 non -governmental organizations attended the meeting.

On July 17 of the same year, after five weeks of hard work, the Roman Foreign Conference finally passed the Roman Roman Rome on the day of the conference. In the voting of no name voting, 120 delegations voted in favor, 7 votes were opposed, and 21 votes were abstracted.

On July 18, 1998, the law was signed in Rome. According to Article 126 of the Period, the rules shall start on the first day of the 60th approval, accepting letter, approval letter, or joining the United Nations Secretary -General of the United Nations.

As of April 11, 2002, a total of 66 countries have approved the rules. As a result, the International Criminal Court of Criminal Court officially took effect on July 1, 2002, and the first permanent international criminal judicial institution in human history was announced.

The main economic source of the International Criminal Court is donated by countries, and the proportion of sharing of various countries is the same as the funding paid by the United Nations member states. For example, in the economic source of the International Criminal Court in 2008, the European Union accounted for 51.9 million euros, accounting for more than 50%: Japan donated 19.9 million euros, accounting for 22%.

To this day, 134 countries around the world have signed the "Period" and 123 countries have approved the "Statistics". However, the three major good people in Lanxing collectively lacked the International Criminal Court of Criminal Courts.

The United States launched wars everywhere, and it was extremely opposed to the establishment of the organization because its regulations on the crime of war were almost tailor -made for the United States. Once they joined, there was no doubt that the US Army would become a frequent visitor to the International Criminal Court.

Although my country does not have the worries of the war traffickers like the United States, they have not joined the International Criminal Court. Among them, the Chinese delegation of the Chinese delegation who participated in the International Criminal Court of Foreign Affairs Conference in that year The reporter made a more detailed explanation when asking questions, mainly including the following aspects:

First, China cannot accept the provisions of the Roman Statue on universal jurisdiction. It is believed that it is not based on the national jurisdiction of the court voluntarily, so it does not comply with the provisions of the Vienna Treaty Convention;

Secondly, China's "war crime" in the Roman Statistics includes serious reservations in the crime of war in domestic sexual armed conflicts, which believes that this definition is beyond the category of customary international law;

(Wang Guangya)

Third, the Chinese delegation reserves the provisions of the Roman Statue on the role of the Security Council. It is believed that the crime of aggression is a national behavior.

Fourth, China has a serious reservation of the investigation of the Prosecutor of the Roman Statue. It is believed that the prosecutor or the court's power may be too much to become a tool to interfere in the country's internal affairs;

Fifth, China's definition of "anti -humanitarian crime" in the Roman Statue has a reservation position. According to the international law, the scope of application of "anti -humanitarian crime" should be limited to the war period.

Based on the above considerations, my country has not yet joined the organization.

The most interesting thing is that Russia, Russia signed the Roman Statistics in September 2000, but the Russian Parliament has not been approved to take effect. By 2016, Putin directly announced the withdrawal from the International Criminal Court.

An international organization that lacks "Shangsanchang" is really like the National Federation a hundred years ago.

The purpose of the establishment of the International Criminal Court is to extend justice and punish rape to eliminate evil, but it does not seem to be so fair in implementation. During the law enforcement process, ICC seems to be "cared" about some countries.

Since its establishment in Hague, Netherlands in July 2002, in the 11 years in 2013, all eight cases investigated by the International Criminal Court were all related to Africa, of which 3 of the African countries were charged. They were Kenya. President Kenya, Vice President Luto, and Sudan President Bahill.

(Kenya President Kenya)

In 2004, the Central African Republic asked the International Criminal Court to hear severe crimes during the armed conflict between the country and the Congo (Gold). After investigation by the International Criminal Court of Criminal Court, during the chairman of the Liberation Movement and Commander of the Congo, the allegations of the chairman of the Congo Benba, a premeditated attack on the civilians of the Chinese and African Republics, committed the crime and harm of the war and endangered humans. crime. In May 2008, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Benba. Soon after, Benba was arrested in Belgium and was subsequently sent to Hague to detain. Thisba was the first defendant arrested by the International Criminal Court.

(June 21, 2016, the former Vice President of the Congo (Gold) President Jean-Pierre Benba (right) appeared in the Hague International Criminal Court of the Netherlands)

In February 2003, the civil war broke out in Sudan, causing more than 10,000 people to be killed, and more than 1 million people were displaced, of which about 500,000 people lived in refugee camps.

On March 31, 2005, the Security Council passed the resolution of 11 votes in favor and 4 abstains, and decided that suspects who would commit war and anti -human crime in the Sudan Dalfur region were submitted to the International Criminal Court for trial. It also requires the Sudan government and the conflict of conflicts in Darfur to actively cooperate.

On June 6, 2005, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court announced that the International Criminal Court will conduct investigation and evidence collection of suspects of war in Darfur.

On May 18, 2009, the Sudan Dalfur rebel leader Abu Kada first appeared in court in the International Criminal Court in Hague, Netherlands. He was the first prosecutor who took the initiative to accept the court since the establishment of the court in 2002, and the first defendant involving the Darfur issue.

On March 4, 2009, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant to the Sudan President Bahill. Earlier, the International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for the Minister of Humanism and Darfur Military Organization, Ali Kuisb.

(Former Sudan President Bahill)

Bahill was the first president in the world to be arrested by the International Criminal Court. What is even more outrageous is that Sudan is not a contractor of the International Criminal Court at all. This is the first time in human history, breaking through previous international laws.

(Sudan people spontaneously on the streets to hold a solidarity parade, "vowed to defend the president with every drop of blood")

On February 26, 2011, the Security Council passed a resolution that transferred Libyan's situation to the International Criminal Court for treatment. The Office of the Prosecutor's Office of the International Criminal Court announced that it would investigate the allegations of the Gaddafi regime.

The African brothers were very happy at first, thinking that there was a place to reason, but later I felt more and more wrong: MD, how did your court judge Africans?

The practice of the International Criminal Court has caused strong dissatisfaction in African countries. In October 2013, the African Alliance specially held a special summit in the Siyabibaba, Ethiopian, to discuss the issue of only Africans in the International Criminal Court.

The meeting proposed that in order to maintain the order, stability and completeness of the constitutional constitution, the heads of state of the non -Alliance member should not be charged during their tenure or should not be required to appear in any international court.

Some African countries in Africa also proposed that the African Criminal Court should be quickly established under the African Framework so that African countries can investigate and accuse the region's crimes that violate human rights in their region.

The African Union also discussed the plan for 34 African contracts to collectively withdraw from the International Criminal Court, but failed to reach an agreement.

(African Alliance in Siyaba in Asia)

In addition to the African brothers, Russia also has a lot of opinions on the International Criminal Court.

In 2008, Georgia and Russia broke out in the South Oussean ladder. In August of that year, a peacekeeper was killed.

The International Criminal Court authorized the inspector of the court to investigate the case, but the prosecutor pointed the key to the investigation to the South Ossean Military Organization and the Russian military, and the investigation of Georgian relevant personnel entrusted to the judicial institution. Without investigating the defendant to investigate the plaintiff, this also aroused strong dissatisfaction with Russia.

(The Russian army enters the South Ossea ladder)

Russia also expressed doubts about the efficiency and funding of the International Criminal Court: For so many years, only four cases were formed, but the funds for handling cases spent one billion US dollars. Are you too burning the case?

This dissatisfaction reached its peak in 2016.

On October 18, 2016, Burundi, then President Pierre Enskolzza, signed a bill, announcing that the East African country withdraws from the Roman Roman Statistics of the International Criminal Court. Essence

(Pierre Enkuronziz)

Three days later, the Secretary -General of the Security Council, Diaryk, confirmed that the United Nations has received a letter from South Africa's decision to withdraw from the International Criminal Court, and then Secretary -General Ban Jiwen regrets this decision in South Africa.

Four days later, the Gambia government announced that the country will withdraw from the International Criminal Court on the grounds that the court implements double standards, suspected of "persecution and humiliation, especially Africans, especially Africans."

The Minister of Communications of Gambia said that since 2002, at least 30 Western countries have committed "ingenious" war crimes against other independent sovereign countries and citizens, but none of war criminals from Western countries have been tried.

More than half a month later, Russian President Putin signed an order to declare that Russia withdrew from the International Criminal Court of Criminal Court of Criminals located in Hague, Netherlands. The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs also issued a statement fiercely saying that the court failed to meet the expectations of the international community and did not become an independent and prestigious international judicial institution. In less than a month, four consecutive retreats, which made the International Criminal Court sweeping the floor. Coupled with the Philippines that withdrew in 2019, five countries have retired directly because of the "unfair treatment" of the International Criminal Court.

Some people say that since the signing of the contract, it indicates that you recognize the rules of the International Criminal Court. If you recognize it, you must take the control. If there is no rules like this, you will retreat when you sentence it. How can you play?

Hey, don't rush to care about the guests first. After all, the rights and obligations are unified. Your international criminal court cannot only ask the member states to "abide by the rules", but you can "dual standards" by yourself.

At the end of 2020, the International Criminal Court released a report of 184 pages saying that in 2003, the British soldiers in Iraq had committed at least 7 of the war in the warrior of the Iraqi. The British soldiers were suspected of "trusted allegations" to torture and rape to Iraqi civilians.

Ben Suda, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, also said, "(My Office) further discovered that civil supervision and military command errors at multiple levels have contributed to the crime of British soldiers in Iraq."

However, for a long time, on the last page of the report, Ben Suda announced that the case is now closed, and the International Criminal Court will not investigate the matter in the future.

As for the reasons for the "conclusion", Ben Suda believes that "Britain has taken real actions to investigate these crimes", and the international criminal court intervene only when a country cannot or is unwilling to take action charged at the atrocities.

"The International Criminal Court is not a human rights agency. Its task is to decide whether to instead the country in criminal cases."

The then British National Defense Minister Ben Wallace immediately set off a donkey, and welcomed the information of the International Criminal Court of "abandoning the investigation of the British military": "Centencies and confirmed that Britain is willing and capable of investigating and prosecuted the improper improper forces of the armed forces. Behavior."

But the fact is that after ten years of investigation in the UK, there is no allegations to any soldier. A British independent investigation personnel were asked to investigate thousands of allegations on the crime of war committed by British soldiers in Iraq. In the end, thousands of complaints were not rejected together, and others were revoked.

For other reasons for the rejection of the unusual cases, Andrew Cayley, the person in charge of the service procuratorial organs (SPA), said "lack of reliable evidence or criminal behavior is at a very low level".

You accuse me a thousand, I just need to file a case, I can't say that I didn't investigate? As long as I investigate, the International Criminal Court has reasons not to check me. Everyone gives each other face and has steps.

Then the question comes, the Philippine procuratorate has always said that there is no evidence of the massacre after investigation, and you bite a country that has retreated. Check it yourself. "Do you give up?

Is there a difference between the country and the race in you? Is this the reason for giving up the investigation too casual?

Even Human Rights Observation Organization, a senior legal adviser to fight side by side with the International Criminal Court, said, "The British government has repeatedly showed that they have no interest in investigating and suing the Riracle of British for overseas. Prosecutors decided to end the end Her investigation in the UK will undoubtedly promote people's views on the dual standards of judicial ugliness: one is the practice of a strong country, and the other is another approach to countries with less influential influence. "

This pair of targets really didn't even see themselves.

Australia also has a scientific style, saying that it will be responsible for the 23 illegal killing incidents of Australian soldiers suspected of being suspected of illegal killing in Afghanistan. Australia's active "responsibility" behavior has also successfully escaped the investigation by the International Criminal Court. ICC has been disagreed with the Afghan army's abuse of Afghanistan civilian cases. When Afghanistan asked Australia for compensation, the Australian side, which "take the initiative to take responsibility", Always avoid.

(Australian soldiers to kill Afghan civilians)

The International Criminal Court investigated the United Kingdom and there was no reason not to investigate the United States. After all, there were thousands of allegations in the small class. Isn't it difficult to write a book? Don't check it without checking.

But the problem comes, and the United States has long known that his buttocks are not clean. Can't help but check, so I have never joined the International Criminal Court.

But for the reputation of the International Criminal Court, for their own reputation, I decided to check the United States. Didn't you say that I pull off the frame every day? Let me show you what is fair, fair and open!

At this time, the International Criminal Court kicked the iron plate, and was turned into a gray face by the first hooligan of the blue star.

In November 2017, while investigating almost the crime of war in Iraq, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Ben Suda also applied for formal investigations on war crimes and human crimes that could occur during the conflict between Afghanistan.

This survey is not aimed at who is, but an indisputable investigation of the parties participating in the war. The main U.S. military is naturally the first. According to the documents released by ICC in 2017, there are sufficient evidence that from 2003 to 2004, the U.S. forces in Afghanistan "implemented torture, infringement of personal dignity, sexual violence, etc." in Afghanistan. However, the United States is not in your organization at all. People ignore it. You do n’t have it. You have no threat to you.

Bolton, then national security adviser, warned Benda in September 2018 that if he investigated war crimes about the United States, Israel, and other American allies, he would face punishment measures. "We will let the ICC die by ourselves."

Yes, not only does it not let you check it yourself, by the way, tell you that his father, you do n’t allow it, you will kill you if you dare to check it.

This allows the International Criminal Court to go down to Taiwan: Britain has given me a step, you directly threatened me. How can I mix in the world in the future?

Can't counsel, the International Criminal Court continued to ask for investigation.

The then US Secretary of State Pompeo issued a warning again that ICC staff participating in the investigation of the US military in Afghanistan or other regions will be rejected by the United States and may face economic sanctions. As soon as the words fell, the United States revoked the US visa in Benda.

Under the repeated pressure of the United States, the ICC pre -trial trial made a ruling on April 12, 2019, and rejected the application for the investigation to investigate the case for investigation by the lack of evidence and the possibility of obtaining the government's cooperation.

Prosecutor Ben Suda did not give up there and appealed again. In March 2020, the International Criminal Court ruled that prosecutors could investigate the allegations of war in Afghanistan, including any crimes that the US military, Afghan government forces, and Taliban may be committed.

This time, Chuanbao was furious: Did my TM face your face? I said that I would retreat when I added the group. I did n’t add you about you@加加加加加? Intersection

Under the anger, Chuanbao signed a presidential administrative order to authorize some employees of the International Criminal Court headed by Ben Suda.

(Trump signed an administrative order to authorize sanctions to sanction the International Criminal Court)

Trump said that the United States is not a parties to the International Criminal Court, and the court has no jurisdiction over US personnel. The International Criminal Court threatened US sovereignty and national security and foreign policies for the investigation of US military and intelligence personnel in Afghanistan.

According to the administrative order signed by Trump, the U.S. government can freeze the assets of employees in the International Criminal Court in the United States and prohibit these employees and their families from entering the United States. In addition, the US government has threatened to sue the International Criminal Court in the United States.

Secretary of State Pompeo, Minister of Defense Esper, Minister of Justice William Balt, and National Security Consultant Robert Obrain jointly announced the "imperial decree" issued by the Emperor Sichuan to the International Criminal Court.

After reading, several people also took turns.

Minister of Justice Balt said that there is reason to suspect the integrity of ICC, and the US Department of Justice has received a lot of reliable information, "we seriously concern the corruption and malfeasance of the senior management of the prosecutor's office."

He even said that the responsibility was in Russia. It was Russia's manipulation of the International Criminal Court to investigate the United States. This made Russians who did not join the International Criminal Court at all. Can it be manipulated if you don't pay the meeting?

Pompeo accused the International Criminal Court of "very inefficient and corruption". It was a "Kangaroo Court (privately unprocessed illegal court)" and warned the American allies: "Your people may be the next."

Pompeo also said that the US sanctions not only investigated the U.S. military's actions in the Afghan war, but also aims to safeguard the interests of allies Israel.

At that time, the Prime Minister Neitanahu immediately welcomed the United States, saying that the International Criminal Court was "obsessed with the" witch hunt "operation of Israel and the United States.

The International Criminal Court issued a statement on the official website on the same day, accusing the US sanctions of sanctions that constitute a threat and coercion. "This attempt to interfere with the legal system is unacceptable." . For many people, the court is the last hope of justice. "

(Empton issued by the International Criminal Court)

The European Union supported the International Criminal Court for the first time. EU ’s senior representative of Foreign Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Berrely, said that the European Union is a strong supporter of the International Criminal Court and expressed serious concern about the US government’ s determination to sanction the staff of the International Criminal Court.

Interestingly, shortly after the United States announced sanctions, Ben Suda was withdrawn, and the new prosecutor Carim Khan especially emphasized when asking the court to restart the charges of human crime of hazardous human beings: a new investigation Objects exclude the war crimes of the US military and the former Afghan government and its army.

This is really "fair" ...

Shortly after taking office, Biden revoked Trump's economic sanctions and visa restrictions on the implementation of the relevant personnel of the International Criminal Court. The powerful America once again kneeling with disobedient international organizations with "strength" again.

There are rivers and lakes where there are people, and there are various games, and the same is true of international organizations. The United Nations is a relatively long international organization in the world today. More than ten years until today.

Looking at the International Criminal Court, the upper three Changchang was absent. The entire EU joined, a piece of iron plate, and a unique family in terms of economic, political, and cultural influence, crushing Africa, South America, Asian countries, or the main source of funding of the international criminal courtcountry.Therefore, it is no wonder that it has become a "court of non -exclusive", and it is not complained that the EU has the idea of "retreating" regardless of the big and small countries.Want to seek fairness and justice here?I am afraid that it is not more the object of "justice" like Lao Du ...

Reference materials: