Is it the conspiracy of communism to make the United States uniformly measure?

Hello everyone, this is a crow.

It is said that this "Emperor's Party" is always urgent than the "emperor".

Two days ago, when the British celebrated Queen Elizabeth II's 70th anniversary of Bucking Jubilee, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced that he would re-evaluate whether there was a possible "restoration" British system quantitative unit in order to implement the "English-public system-public system-public system-public system in the future to achieve a measure of balance. "Double regulations parallel.

The public system, which is what we are most used to now, derived from the decimal unit system during the French Revolution. In 1875, a number of international organizations created the "Missing Convention" and established the International Conference. The 11th International Overweight Conference in 1960 officially established the "International Unit System".

To this day, public system is the most commonly adopted standard measurement system in the world. It is based on seven basic units, thereby establishing a series of "consistent units" with clear conversion relationships.

The British system is different from the standard decimal decimal by the public system. The conversion of each unit is very complicated. For example, the total length of one inch equals three barley. 1 feet is equal to 12 inches, 1 yard is equal to 3 feet, and 1 miles are 1760 yards. How much is the length of 1 mile?

Regardless of the four operations, British barley is really so obedient? Each one is the same?

Unexpectedly, the British system is very inconvenient. As early as the beginning of this century, Britain basically abandoned the British -owned units and switched to public units.

Johnson's "Grandpa British" can faint British young people. In the past 20 years, Britain has been working hard to promote the measurement with the world. How can I get back?

The little golden retriever naturally said, that is, we have been engaged in the public system in the past two decades to integrate with the EU. Now we have all Brexit. Can't we quickly recover my "ancestor of the ancestors"?

However, in the face of Johnson, who was loyal to the ancestors, all sectors of the British society did not give him a little face.

Of course, the Opposition Labor Party believes that Johnson's brain is sick and puts on the right thing to make a toss. The Minister of Commerce of the Labor Party Jonathan Renonz criticized: "What the government should do is to respond to rising living expenses and reduce the burden on merchants."

Even the Conservative Party pulled Johnson to criticize it. Originally, the support rate of the Prime Minister was rotten every day. Many people in the Conservative Party felt that it should be changed to the party leader.

The Conservative MP Elissa Corn said that there were no voters in her constituencies who asked for such a change, "this is not the freedom after Brexit, this is blindly engaged."

The business community has no good face. The British Supermarket Alliance warns that if the conversion is returned to British units, it will increase operating expenses, which will now affect the price increase of millions of households.

The title of the comments published in the "Independent" sarcastic with the spear of the son: restoration of the British system, not even a ounce.

The BBC continued to give Johnson as a dog, and took out the "public martyrs" of the year as a propaganda material, and shouted the flag of Xiao Jinmao.

What is "public martyr"? Hi, when the British promoted public system at that time, in order to speed up the progress, it was stipulated that merchants would be convicted if they did not use public system.

As a result, these vendors resolutely resisted the government, that is, they did not use public prices to sell things, and the British government really caught a few of them.

As soon as the BBC was licking, there was no response from public opinion. Because this is a Soviet joke reproduction:

"What did you go to prison?"

"I oppose public system! How about you?"

"I support public system ..."

Why is British society so disgusted with the government's decision? To put it bluntly, the so -called measurement of "dual regulation and parallel" is really messy.

Speaking of this chaos, there is a ready -made example, Hong Kong, China.

When the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government sells land to real estate developers, it uses the "hectare" of public units, but when the real estate developer sells to the people's house, it uses the British unit to calculate the area in a square foot. It seems that the house is large, but it is actually a small three -bedroom.

The terrible thing is that because the house is sold at the ruler, all industries such as construction, building materials, decoration, and furniture are also used as feet. However The material is transported to Hong Kong.

If these two items are only difficult to be personnel of specific industries, in terms of weighing, Hong Kong is simply a pot of porridge.

In addition to pre -packaging food, it is impossible to convert it before selling, regardless of the British unit "pound" and "ounces", or "pound" and "two", it is still a common computing unit.

Fruits and frozen meat sold in the vegetable market and supermarkets are used as "pounds"; the main grain, vegetables, fresh meat, seafood, and medicinal materials are based on traditional "pounds" and "two".

Fresh meat is sold in pounds, frozen meat is bought in pounds, vegetables are sold in pounds, and fruits are sold in pounds.

What is even more stated is that Hong Kong is not a two -way system and British system. Hong Kong also has a traditional Chinese measurement system. For example, Hong Kong, this catty, it is not the "city pound" (500 grams) we think, but the Qing Dynasty. Traditional Sima Jian (about 600 grams of one Sima) ...

Those who first arrived in Hong Kong to buy vegetables, whether they are mainlanders or Western people, basically have no circles. Even the locals in Hong Kong will lose their ability to judge your youth in this complex conversion, and be slaughtered in the vegetable market. There is still one point in Hong Kong's very stubborn places, that is, the international gold market has always used the British -made unit ounces, but Hong Kong insists on using "two" as a trading unit for gold and precious metals (1 or two is about 1.2 ounces). Put a lot of foreigners traders, and they are suffering.

I accidentally got up in the morning. They thought that the gold had risen sharply. As a result, after chasing and falling, they found that the unit was wrong and lost a bottom.

The reason why the Hong Kong measurement system is so amazing is that since it was illegally occupied by Britain in 1840, it has been used as a commercial port for trade. The Sima system used by the Mainland at that time, the British system brought by the British, and the public system of later generations entered the life of Hong Kong people through trade channels.

In the colonial rule of more than 100 years, these measurement systems have gradually integrated into the traditions of all walks of life. For example, the British system in Hong Kong's local survey and construction industry can be traced back to 1900.

The Hong Kong and British colonial authorities also felt that the phenomenon of such three systems was too chaotic, so in 1978, the decimal committee was established to promote public system to uniformly balance the unit.

Finally, in 1998, after 20 years of hard work, this measurement of the decimal committee was dissolved ...

In fact, it is not the end of the government that the Government of the Witt district has ended. When Hong Kong and Britain set up this measurement of the decimal committee, there was almost no mandatory power.

Faced with non -useful merchants and street vendors, the measures of the measurement can only be promoted and appeal; in the face of non -public primary schools, the measurement of the measurement of the measurement can only be proposed.

In the final analysis, the Hong Kong and British governments have no determination to promote the public system at all, leaving the SAR government as a mess.

The traditions of all walks of life and the habits used by citizens can not change in the short term, and the SAR government will come down. As a result, Hong Kong is still in parallel to make people dizzy.

The funny thing is that in order to deal with this situation, some people in the legal community put forward the "genius idea". It is suggested that the SAR government should launch a unit conversion application app to assist the public to clarify the unit ...

Speaking of Britain's "Gonggong British" this time, some people criticized Johnson. This is "nostalgic weapons", which politically controls the system and increases legal support to Brexit. Essence

To put it bluntly, the Prime Minister of Little Golden Retriever Blows the Dog's whistle is also happy.

If the measurement system in Hong Kong highlights a chaos, the US measurement system highlights a outrageous.

Students who always watch American sports events and American dramas should know that as the world's most powerful developed countries, the United States uses different measures and balance systems from most countries in the world. After 20 years of abandoning the British system in the UK, the United States is still " Stubborn and confidently use the English system.

You ask the Americans how tall he is, and he tells you that he is "five feet ten". You ask him how much he is. He tells you "180 pounds". Do you ask him about 180 pounds about 80 kg? He looked at you with a look of embarrassment, as if he heard something ghost. Do you ask him if he has a fever? He said, ah, see ghosts, my body temperature is 104 degrees!

On the American highway, it is the road sign of the British -made unit; in the American store, the merchant sells things with British -made heavy units; in a bar in the United States, whiskey is sold at ounces. You have to convert it to know that this glass of wine is that this glass of wine is It's not a loss ...

Is Americans really "big husbands" with this "interval" system?

of course not.

On December 11, 1998, the "Mars Climate Detector" launched a launch in the Kanaviral Horn Air Force Base, Florida, USA.

The height of the Mars Climate Detector is 2.1 meters, the width is 1.6 meters, and the length is 2 meters. The internal structure of the detector is mainly composed of graphite composite material/aluminum honeycomb structure, which is built based on the design of many commercial aircraft. In addition to scientific instruments, batteries and main engines and fuels are the most important systems on the detector.

The total cost of Mars Climate Detector was 327.6 million US dollars, of which US $ 193.1 million was developed to develop, $ 91.7 million to launch, and cost $ 42.8 million for detection tasks.

It can be said that this Mars Climate Detector is a little baby that NASA is quite cherished. Astronomers plan to use it to study Mars atmosphere, Mars Climate and Mars surface, and help the Mars' landlord number to communicate with the earth.

But such an expensive baby, when he was about to enter the scheduled track, suddenly disappeared from the sight of scientists ...

Why is it gone at once? After the task failed, NASA conducted a comprehensive look at it and found that it was because of the error in calculation.

Because the flight system software on the Mars Climate Detector uses public units Newton to calculate the motivation of the pusher, and the direction correction and pusher parameters entered by the ground personnel use the British unit to force The tile disintegration.

Okay, because of the conversion problem of this English -owned public system, hundreds of millions of dollars were drifted by hundreds of millions of dollars. It is conceivable that if the United States does not have the British -made moth, there will be no such bizarre and funny mistakes at all. Throw hundreds of millions of dollars into the water. Although the United States may be "not bad", but for the British system, it really doesn't hurt? Don't really think about changing this bizarre and different measures from the world?

Not to mention, Americans really have no idea in this regard.

In fact, when the "Missing Convention" was founded in 1875, the United States was one of the founding countries. In 1960, when the 11th International Measurement Conference decided to implement the "international unit system", the United States also participated in the country.

Going forward, even as early as 1790, the third president of the United States Jefferson had suggested that Congress established the decimal metering method. This is just out of the French Revolution ...

The United States has been actively promoting public system, but has never succeeded ...

Well -known American meteorologist Tim Hire said in a program in Houston that the future weather forecast should increase the degree of degrees Celsius in public system. As a result, it was sprayed by locals in Dezhou.

"Why cater to the international community? They (the whole world) should learn the way the United States."

"It is just a concession for political correctness and liberalism. I have traveled around the world, and I have never seen someone in this way."

If this is just arrogant, there are more scary!

"Public system, that is the penetration conspiracy of communism!"

The reason why these British supporters are so magical, to some extent, are a kind of reflection to supporters.

In the United States, the so -called everything can be transformed into a weapon of party struggle.

Over the years, intellectuals and liberal parties in large cities support the use of British -made people. They are extremely ridiculous and described as those who use British systems as fools and villagers. This gives conservative politicians a chance to turn the British system into the key to unity voters.

Those who grow up in the countryside and town, and have grown up in the British tradition, are not malicious to the public system. However, his habit of the British system actually became a manifestation of inconsistent, uncivilized, and no culture in the mouth of the "city", which undoubtedly greatly hurt the self -esteem of these conservatives.

Under such emotions, conservative politicians can turn this anger into the power of mobilization as long as they are induced slightly. For these simple people, as long as they insist on using the British system, they will become a "righteous move" against "liberalism and communism". Why not?

Is there a cheaper "righteousness" in the world?

Republican Chake Greesley Before 1974, it was just a small person who was not famous in the lower house of Euishi. However, in 1975, the then President Ford signed the Public System Conversion Act. Ke quickly seized the opportunity.

He clearly opposed public system and established a "anti -public alliance" to use his social resources to spread theory such as the so -called "public system is communist conspiracy".

"Forced the American people to use public system to violate our democratic principles. In a country, a system of measurement, this is communism." Greesley announced in June 1977.

For those rural people who were ridiculed and suffered from self -esteem, Chake became their spokesperson. Everyone joined the "Anti -Public Alliance" to start war on public system. The movement eventually provided public opinion support for the Reagan Disopoly Public System.

And also using the trend of this movement. In the 1980s, Chake successfully elected US senators and became top politicians.

After that, the conservatives supporting the British system that supported public systems were increasingly looking down, thinking that the other party's IQ had problems and could not talk at all. The conservatives believed that liberals were too arrogant and looked down on people, and they were brainwashed by "communist conspiracy".

The discussion on the public/English system has finally escaped from the actual category and became a political dispute ...

The use of public system has long been a world trend, because whether it is multi -regulatory or use or British system, it is a behavior of finding trouble. The thinness of the United States is not right, but conservative politicians say public system as "communism", which is even more unreasonable.

Of course, if the United States continues to be stubborn, it is to use the British system, and then to Louzi in the field of aerospace and high -precision sciences, what can we do?

What do you say? There are such good things ...

Reference materials:

CNN: Refusal incoming, the only public highway in the United States

---

Lifetime education: Is public system conspiracy?

"Reference of Youth": The "Centennial War" of British and Public Systems

BBC: The Queen Baijinxi government intends to "restore" the British system to the ins and outs of the British system

- END -