The U.S. Congress passed the legislation: providing 24 -hour security protection for the direct relatives of the Supreme Court Justice of the United States

According to several US media reports, the House of Representatives of the United States Congress has passed legislation on Tuesday to provide 24 -hour full -day security protection for the Nine Federal Supreme Court of the Supreme Court of the United States Federal Court. Previously, the legislation had passed the Senate last month. At present, only when the US President Biden is signed, this law will take effect.

According to the New York Times, the background of this legislation is a personal security threat that judges and relatives of the United States and their relatives in recent years. Among them, in 2020, the son and husband of the federal judge of the Federal Judge of the New Jersey District Court in the United States were shot at home at home, causing his son to die and the husband were injured. In June of this year, a retired judge in Wisconsin, USA, was also murdered at home. Brett Cavano, a jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States, was almost killed at home, but the gunmen near his house finally chose to give up the crime and surrender.

However, the New York Times has not mentioned that the social contradictions and political confrontation that the United States has continuously intensified in recent years, and the increasing disadvantages of the United States' political and legal system, is also a one of the constant threats of judges and their families. reason. For example, the gunman who shot the retired judge of Wisconsin was a Trump fan of the hardcore, and he originally intended to continue shooting a series of politicians who were unfaithful to Trump. The man who intended to shoot the judge Cavano was strongly dissatisfied with Cavano's intended to abolish the US constitution's protection of female abortion rights and might block the reform of the American gun control.

In fact, in May this year, a draft opinion on the abolition of the constitution's abolition of the protection of women's abortion rights was leaked to the media within the U.S. Supreme Court. The conservative judges of the Supreme Court were threatened by the Supreme Court.

Therefore, the US Congress urgently passed the legislation and expanded the 24 -hour full -day protection of the nine lifelong judges of the Supreme Court to expand it to its direct relatives.

But ironic is that even if such a simple legislation of providing security protection for the family members of the big judges has encountered a "party contention" within the US Congress. Although the bill was passed in the Senate's full vote, in the House of Representatives, 27 democratic party politicians voted against the bill. Judging from the report of the New York Times, these Democratic members hope that the bill can incorporate other members of the Supreme Court who are also likely to be threatened by violence, but Republican members believe that this is completely unnecessary and accuses the Democratic Party that wants to want Malicious blocking this legislation. The Republican Fox News Network also hung the list of 27 Democratic members.

However, the New York Times also added that the US Congress is actually discussing another legislation that protects the judge's factors and intends to block personal information such as the family address of the judge from the Internet, but this legislation has continued to be affected by the Republican Party Senator Rand Paul's obstruction, because the latter hopes to expand the scope of privacy protection to their legislators.

- END -