Social Comment: Implement the consensus of the head of state, the United States has performed badly in the past four months

U.S. President Biden revealed to the media on the 20th that China and the United States may meet within 10 days. A spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on the 21st that the heads of state of the two countries have maintained communication through various forms. There is no news about whether they have recently met. Recently, the United States has released the information about the upcoming meeting of the Sino -US dollar to the United States several times, which is more positive.

For more than a month, senior officials in China and the United States have involved in strategic, diplomacy, national defense, economy and trade and other fields. It should be said that its frequency, wide range, and deep communication have been rare since the deterioration of Sino -US relations, and it has accumulated conditions for the future high -level exchanges between the two countries. But it is regrettable that in the recent series of behaviors against China, the psychology of confrontation is obviously far better than cooperation, and the intention of curbing China's development for a long time has been revealed. In particular, the dazzling contrast between the actual actions of the United States and President Biden's solemn promise seriously weakened the national credit in the United States.

The first call of China and the United States was on March 18th, and it has been more than 4 months. We roughly counted. During this period, it was not a long time, and the United States visited Taiwan three times, and the former defense chief visited Taiwan. Military sales, a total of $ 323 million; US warships traveled through the Taiwan Strait at least three times; US members of the United States proposed at least 6 malignant issues in Taiwan. According to the statement, only "the United States does not support Taiwan's independence" later, forming a bad impact; the United States invited Taiwan to participate in the second online "Global New Crown Epidemic Summit", vigorously promoting the "Taiwan participation in the WHO", and manipulating the United States, Japan, and the United States. Various joint statements such as Han and G7 pointed to the situation of the Taiwan Strait.

During this period, the United States also launched the "Indo -Pacific Economic Framework" to hold a "Quartet Security Dialogue" to promote voting on the "Chip Act". Safety, technology, diplomacy and other fields are blocked and rejected China. U.S. Secretary of State Broskyi delivered a long speech on China's policy on May 26. Although it has made a lot of packaging, it can be seen that its essence is still to suppress and curb China's development by "malignant competition".

Which of the above items is not a violation of President Biden's "four unintentional" commitments? Former US Secretary of State Kissinger reminded President Biden on the 19th not to "endless confrontation" with China. Today, "Chinese phobia" has become the devil of Washington, and American diplomacy and national strategy are around it.

The fundamental way out of the dilemma of Sino -US relations is to conscientiously implement the consensus reached by the heads of state of the two countries. China has always developed Sino -US relations in accordance with the three principles of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win -win cooperation proposed by President Xi Jinping. This attitude is consistent and clear. However, if the United States always has different words and deeds, it is difficult to make people not doubt their sincerity and true heart.

In the call on March 18, the heads of state of the two countries blamed the work teams of the two countries to follow up in time, took practical actions, and strived to return to the track of stable development in Sino -US relations. I have to say that through the observation, evaluation and summary of Sino -US relations in the past 4 months, the work of the US team is obviously not in place and should be held accountable. The United States needs a reasonable explanation to the Chinese side. Of course, the most important thing is to take practical actions to prove the sincerity to the Chinese side. China has previously proposed four lists, and Washington needs to give a clear response. These are necessary for the possible preparation of the first call of China and the United States.

In any case, dialogue is better than confrontation, and communication is better than conflict. The head of the head of state has a strategic leading role in Sino -US relations, and it can also enhance the positive expectations of the international community's future development of Sino -US relations. To the extent the United States' implementation of the consensus of the heads of state of the two countries, directly affects the trend of Sino -US relations. In the past 4 months, the United States has handed over a bad transcript. We hope that the United States will be able to take this lesson next.

- END -