"The United States is getting more and more disgusted in Latin America"

The Ninth American Summit closed in Los Angeles in the United States a few days ago. Countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have widely criticized the United States to insist on not inviting Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua to participate in the conference. International public opinion pointed out that the United States excluded some countries outside the summit to expose the true purpose of "division, hegemony, and discrimination" of the borrowing summit. The results of this summit are rare, and it once again proves that the United States has pursued the essence of "US priority" and "good mouth benefits" in the Latin American policy.

"The American Summit seems to be a 'diplomatic nightmare' in the United States"

The American Summit is composed of a series of international conferences held between North America, Central America, South America and the Caribbean. It was first held in 1994. This year is the second host of the United States as the host of the summit.

On the grounds of so -called "democratic issues", the United States refused to invite the leaders of Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua to attend the American Summit. Many countries in Latin America were strongly dissatisfied with this. Mexican President Lopez refused to attend, and only lower -level delegations from Bolivia, Honduras and other countries participated in the meeting. According to Reuters, among the 35 members of the American countries, in addition to hosting Gome, the proportion of the leaders of American countries accounted for about 1/3. The meeting has also become the least participating leaders since the establishment of the American Summit.

The Cuban government issued a statement saying that the U.S. government attempts to use the high -level dialogue mechanism such as the American Summit as a tool for its dominance to make the regional division by rowing him. The United States holds the thinking of "Monroeism", infringe on the independence and sovereignty of other countries, and hinders the unity and integrated development of Latin America and the Caribbean region. Lopez said that the "interferenceism" in the United States, on the grounds of so -called "dictatorship" or relationships, failed to invite all member states to attend the summit.

Brett Broan, who had served as the White House's global contact in the White House during the Obama administration, wrote on social media: "8 countries have not sent leaders to participate in the most important activities in the region; this fully illustrates our relationship with neighboring countries What a bad ... "

The Spanish "National News" reported that the US government originally expected to show the so -called "leadership status" of the United States in the Latin American region by holding the American Summit, but due to improper handling, the result was "everyone is not happy", and the "America Summit becomes becoming the United States’s in the United States. A 'diplomatic nightmare' ".

"The United States attempts to make division in Latin America and the Caribbean region"

During the summit, the United States promised to strengthen cooperation with regional countries in terms of economic and trade, food security, public health, climate change, and immigration issues. However, policy analysts generally question whether these plans can significantly affect. The so -called immigration protection proposed by the United States is also considered by public opinion to try to shirk responsibility and let relevant Latin American countries bear more liability for immigration problems.

Venezuela President Maduro recently said that the American Summit has not only been publicly resisted by many regional countries for participating issues, and the theme and agenda settings of the conference have not been closely related to poverty and employment issues that the American people are concerned about. Essence

The previous 21st American Bolivar Alliance Summit issued a statement stating that all American countries should be invited to participate in the Ninth American Summit under equal conditions. The United States has no right to exclude some countries or infringe on other countries' sovereignty and independence. Essence "Such exclusive conferences" do not help solve the challenges and threats facing regions and globally.

Nicaragua President Foreign Policy and International Affairs Consultant Valdrak Yanchk said that the United States does not have any moral advantages to accuse and try to change the country that realizes the true democracy by protecting the rights of the people, and there is no right to impose illegal sanctions on other countries. Unilateral sanctions The behavior itself is anti -democracy. Emidro Carvoli, a Professor of Law of the Brazilian Vagas Foundation, said in an interview with this reporter that the list of the American Summit was invited to have obvious selectivity and exclusion, reflecting the essence of the United States to hold this summit. It is to safeguard its own economic and political interests, "the response of regional countries shows the lack of US leadership."

Speeda, a scholar at the State Autonomous University of Mexico, pointed out that many of the initiatives proposed by the United States at the conference could not be implemented, and lack of effective mechanisms and institutions and permanent forums. These lacks have caused their promises to become "short checks" again, and cannot really solve the problem of urgency.

"This is the questioning and resistance of American hegemonism"

At present, the Americas are facing challenges to strengthen the prevention and control of epidemic, promote economic recovery, and respond to climate change. Professor John Kirk, a professor at the University of Dalhos, Canada, pointed out that for the summit aimed at improving epidemic response measures, it was "weird" to exclude Cuba outside. Cuba was vaccinated for 96%of the population, and thousands of medical professionals were dispatched to abroad for assistance. "At least we should listen to Cuba's successful response to the epidemic. Washington has lost the opportunity to respond to major regions of major regions."

Raphael Elandus, an expert in Cuban America, said that the geopolitical situation in Latin America and Caribbean has transformed in a profound political situation, and today's region's political framework has become more diverse. The U.S. government continues to adopt an isolated policy, which was out of time in the 21st century. "The United States believes that they are arbiters of democracy, human rights, and freedom. This position does not help promote the dialogue of the Western Hemisphere."

Mary Anna Aparisio, a professor at the National University of Mexico, believes that the United States lacks basic respect for Latin American countries and regards Latin America as a "backyard" random bullying, sanctions on Latin America, inflation, and political intervention.Multi -country leaders have criticized or refused to participate in the American Summit, "this is a question and resistance to American hegemonism."Cavili said that for a long time, the so -called "commitment" of the United States to the Latin American countries not only did not promote the development of the local social, but brought a series of evil results, which was "the root cause of the increasingly resentment of the United States in Latin America."

According to Argentina's "National Daily", Argentina Foreign Minister Kafifero said at the American Summit Foreign Minister's Foreign Minister's meeting that equality and justice is the basis of political stability, harmonious international relations, and deepening democracy, and an exclusive summit is destined to fail.Argentina called for a blockade and economic sanctions against Cuba and Venezuela.

(Source: "People's Daily")

- END -