Improve the transformation and evaluation system of think tank results

The new think tank with Chinese characteristics provides strong intellectual support for the decision -making of the party and the government. In order to better play the role of think tanks in national governance, effectively carry out think tank research, improve the efficiency of results conversion, promote the realization of results value, and stimulate researchers' research driving force. Think tanks need to further improve the transformation of results and the evaluation system of results.

Understand the research characteristics of think tanks

Scientific understanding think tank results

Think tank research has its own characteristics, fully understands and grasp these characteristics, and helps deepen the understanding of think tank research and think tank results.

The first is the complexity of the object. The targets of think tanks are mostly complex systems. It is necessary to solve the problem of stability and stability of reform and development, but also to cope with increasingly complex global problems. Unlike the anatomical thinking of conventional scientific research, think tank research emphasizes overall and systematic thinking. Conventional scientific research mostly cuts into a certain perspective or a dimension, emphasizing the contribution of cognition; think tank research emphasizes the overall grasping its internal operation rules, predicts or proposes a reasonable solution, emphasizes the early warning of the problem And cracking. Facing the complicated social reality problems, it is difficult to effectively solve the real dilemma with the original thinking. Anatomical and mechanical solutions are often unable to understand and solve the problem in essence. The phenomenon.

The second is the independence of ideological viewpoints. Think tank research is independent. Think tanks are places where ideology and dissemination are produced. Only by allowing think tank researchers to study dignified and independent views can the value of think tanks truly reflect the value of think tanks and make the results of the think tank more constructive. Effectiveness of early warning and plan.

Once again, the diversity of results types. In terms of achievements, there are text forms such as research, suggestions, planning, evaluation, policy preaching, forum discussions, policy consulting, and media vocalization; on the level of attention, there are strategic research, tactical research and operating research; academic levels; academic level In terms of theoretical type, application type, and media type; at the timing level, there is a difference between previous research, medium -sized research and post -after -type research.

Finally, the lag of value embodiment. Generally speaking, the timeliness of the think tank is strong, the research cycle of research is short, and the time limit for submission is urgent, but it corresponds to the lag of the value of the results. You need to wait for practice verification.

Key process of control process

Promote the realization of achievement value

Compared with scientific research papers, the results of think tanks due to the restrictions of service objects, publishing channels, and level -related levels, and the cost of sinking is higher. To improve the transformation efficiency of think tank results and promote the value of results, it is necessary to select the research and achievement of the value of the value of the value of the think tanks such as topic, problem, break questions, deduction, reporting, conversion, feedback, evaluation, etc. Key links, focus on.

Do a good job of the topic of the topic and lay the successful starting point of the results. It is necessary to follow the issue of the party committee and government and decision -making departments to establish a think tank research direction. Think tank consulting research should focus on three points: first, the party committee and government's attention, but not clear issues; second, the party committee and government's attention, the direction of the direction but the path is unclear; Specific issues. In fact, these problems include the deep -seated problems of reform, the problem of promoting development, the forward -looking problems that affect the stability, and the realistic issues facing the present.

Do a good job of breaking the topic to ensure the scientific and rationality of the results. The effective development of think tank scientific research activities must follow the scientific research principles of "big background, multi -angle, systematic, and optimization". To jump out of the scope of the topic itself, think about the essence of the problem in a larger background, then focus on the key points, cut in from a diverse perspective, and then comprehensively analyze and judge, compare several solutions to seek the optimal solution. Therefore, the research of think tanks must grasp the relationship between separation and integration. Do not lean on a certain angle, ignore it, and blind people to touch the image; grasp the relationship between the local and the whole, do not see the trees without seeing the forest; grasp the relationship between the stage and the cycle, and the mechanical and the organic and organic Relationship.

Grasp the transformation of achievements and realize the transition of "from 0 to 1". The transformation of the results of think tanks is not only related to the quality of the results, but also related to the reporting channel. Therefore, the conversion rate of think tank results is increased, and on the one hand, it is necessary to increase the arrival rate of think tanks, increase the number of submitting channels, increase the quality of the reporting channel, and select the appropriate submission channel according to the type of results type; on the other hand, we must strive to improve the recognition of results recognition Rate, improve the time, theme selection, basic cognition, and research depth of the research on the results of think tanks.

Improve results evaluation system

Stimulate the motivation of think tank personnel

The types of think tanks are diverse, the value of value is different, and the effect of conversion efficiency is different. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a sound evaluation system for think tank results. Only by scientifically evaluating the results of think tanks can we better stimulate the motivation of think tank personnel to consult with politics, and therefore produce more and better think tank results. Establish a sound scientific think tank results evaluation mechanism, and it is necessary to motivate think tanks to produce high -quality think tanks that have promoted economic and social development, and cultivate more high -level think tank researchers that can solve economic and social development issues. The key to judging the success of the evaluation system depends on whether it can better promote the achievement of the above purposes. Otherwise, simply management of management will inevitably lead to scientific research on the purpose of cope with management.

First of all, the misunderstanding of the evaluation of think tank results and return to the evaluation of the results of the think tank. At present, think tank evaluation is approved by the number of instructions to verify the workload, which is similar to the long -term trouble in my country's scientific research community, "Theory, hat, post title, academic qualifications, and only awards". Social evaluation. Whether the results of think tank can obtain a certain amount of accident depends on whether it is delivered to the appropriate leadership through the right time. Therefore, the evaluation model of the combination of supplier evaluation and social evaluation must be established, which is the academic evaluation within the think tank internal evaluation. A comprehensive assessment of the results. Secondly, according to the type of results and think tank positioning, the evaluation standards are formulated. The results of think tanks have three functions: interpretation, relief, and confusion, and correspond to the political research, countermeasures and strategic research of think tanks, respectively. Different types of think tanks need different evaluation modes. The interpretation results are mostly published in newspapers and magazines in the form of articles, and can adopt the "Journal Comment" evaluation model. The results of the worries are mostly tactical solutions. Generally, it is approved to be transformed into a specific department to transform the implementation. It can use the "affirmative instructions+implementation effects" model in combination with the requirements of the demand evaluation and objective evaluation. The results of the solution of confusion are very strategic and need to make huge changes. The evaluation can adopt the model of "supply party evaluation, the combination of the effect of the demand evaluation and the effect of implementation". In addition, the application effect of such think tank results often takes a long time. On the basis of instant evaluation, it can be evaluated for medium and long -term addition.

The division of positioning of think tanks is different, and the focus of the results of think tanks is also different. Taking local think tanks as an example, with the provincial Academy of Social Sciences as the main body, the think tank group supplemented by the Party School's Academy of Administration and colleges and universities, the theoretical skills are strong. Its core ability is to grasp the essence of the problem. Give the government more ideas to occupy a dominant position in long -term and basic decision -making consulting. The policy research institutions of party and government agencies such as the Development Research Center are mainly based on the implementation plan, which is operable. The core ability is to resolve strategies and implement it. And emergency decision consultation reflects the advantages. Therefore, the evaluation of the results of think tanks must also change with different types of think tanks and positioning.

(Author Unit: Institute of Rural Development, Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences)

Source: China Social Science Network-Journal of Social Sciences of China

Author: Wang Huabing

- END -