[Solution] Can't the baby enter the "smart class" without buying a tablet?

With the guise of voluntary voluntary, students can buy tablets, do not buy a smart class; school -enterprise joint selling software, parents have taken out thousands of ... Recently, the national joint conference office of the national governance and education chaos, , Henan, Guangdong, Yunnan and other places implemented special supervision of random charges in the name of "education informatization".

Education informatization has become the guise of some people's money?

A middle school in Taiyuan, Shanxi introduced the "smart class" at the Freshman Parent's Association. Picture source: Xinhua News Agency

one

Some time ago, the media exposed many moths in the education field--

In Taiyuan, Shanxi, many schools divide "smart classes" and "ordinary classes" according to "whether to buy tablet computers". If you want to enter the "smart class", you have to pay the "tablet computer resource service fee" at one time. Not paying? Enter ordinary classes.

A school in Guangzhou has carried out the "Information Smart Classroom Teaching Experiment" since 2020. In 2020, there were 497 freshmen at the school, 16 people who did not purchase designated tablets; 528 freshmen in 2021, and 50 non -buyers. Seeing that the "wisdom rate" declined, the school immediately compiled the 50 people into a class. The parents were afraid that their children felt discriminated against, and they still paid their pockets.

Earlier, a city in Zhejiang had 22,000 junior high school students participating in "flat teaching". Buying a tablet computer costs 3,000 yuan per capita, coupled with the software for bundling sales, students and parents spend a total of 110 million yuan.

The local education authority said that this is "everyone voluntarily." However, parents report that some schools take "smart classroom payment" as the first step in the registration of freshmen. On the day of the registration, there are third -party institutions on -site charges. Is this "voluntary"? Obviously the school and third -party institutions are "conspiracy". If there are two babies at home, you have to buy a double tablet. As for some economic difficulties, they can't afford tablets, they can only see the gap between children and their peers.

Some schools also have a martial arts "directional enrollment" from "less scores". As long as you spend money to buy tablets, you can skip the score line, go directly to the school, and divide it to the "smart class" to give special preferential treatment in the distribution of teachers.

On the surface, the profit of "education informatization" is the illegal revenue of some schools and enterprises; essentially, this crooked and evil spirit directly infringes the fairness of education.

(Picture source: Network)

two

Many departments such as the Ministry of Education have clearly stipulated: "Education mobile applications that require unified use as teaching and management tools shall not charge students and parents."

The cost of education informatization, one depends on the funding of fiscal education, and the two depends on local government investment, and pass the cost to students in any form is a complete violation of regulations.

But why are similar violations still exist?

Xiong Bingqi, the dean of the 21st Century Education Research Institute, told the island girl that in some places, they wanted to promote the promotion of education informatization as a "educational performance", but they had no money to invest, so they acquiesced to the school to charge students.

There are more tricks to make money. Some schools and enterprises are engaged in "targeted cooperation" and forced students and parents to purchase the company's products in disguise; some companies simply get the local education system and require local schools to purchase their own equipment in the form of administrative orders; some local education departments engage in power Search for rent, forcibly include the "information equipment" in the school's modern evaluation index system, and then secretly "point out the way" to the school.

Lei Wanghong, a teacher at the School of Public Management, Central South University, who has been engaged in grass -roots education research for a long time, bluntly stated that in the eyes of many people, education is "big fat". Through the "double reduction", education capitalization is strictly prohibited, and the economic negatives caused by off -campus training to students' families can be reduced. However, some people are drilling hard, and illegal education informatization adds a new burden.

Obviously, the "purchasing power" class and the "money ability" look at the dishes, which will exacerbate the digital gap between students, schools, and regions.

Intelligent equipment charging cabinet in a middle school classroom (picture source: Xinhua News Agency)

three

Some parents have questioned that the so -called "education informationization" is equivalent to buying a tablet and not installing an app? How much help is the improvement of education quality? Are there any scientific calculations and arguments?

In Xiong Bingqi's view, of course, education is not as more flat. The state has previously issued regulations that it clearly proposes to protect young people's vision and reduce students' use of electronic products. Excessive relying on electronic products will also make some teachers get used to "PPT Xuanke", which will weaken teaching ability.

"Why can traditional education methods continue for so many years? It is because it can realize in -depth interaction between teachers and students." Lei Wanghong said that as an educational carrier, information technology is a double -edged sword. For example Poor students may be addicted to Internet addiction, and children are holding smart devices to play games, brush short videos, and copy answers.

The absurdity of the reality of information and charging charges appears in many places. The "technology flicker" of merchants is part of the cause. Existing corruption chain.

The original intention of "education informatization" is good, providing a solution for us to solve the uneven educational resources. However, don't lose the root of educating people in any innovation in the education field, and it cannot be reduced to "wisdom to collect money".

Text/Point Cangjushi

Edit/波 波 波

- END -