Extraordinary Comment | Anhui Tongling responded to the average of 2,000 yuan per capita in the middle school. Parents really "all agree"?

Ji Mu News commentator Qu Jing

On September 6, some parent representatives questioned the public hotline message board that the Tongling No. 1 Middle School (14) of Tongling No. 1 Middle School received 2,000 yuan per person, a total of more than 80,000 yuan, can it be used? Where is it? Subsequently, the Office of the People's Government of Tongling City asked the Municipal Education and Sports Bureau to respond that the cost was obtained by the family committee to obtain the consent of all parents, and the income and expenditure did not go through the class teacher. The expenses are mainly used for teaching materials payment, learning and activity expenses. (According to the surging news on September 9)

Related messages for the mayor to the mayor (picture source: network screenshot)

It is already confused without explanation, and the explanation is even more ridiculous. From the meaning of the reply, the 42 people in the class total 84,000 yuan such high expenses. In order to facilitate the parents' consent, the family committee was collected. Services. However, if all parents agree, why will there be parents questioning the mayor's hotline, do parents really agree or "agree"?

Furthermore, the questions raised by the parents are what is the use of class fees and why does it need to collect so much money? The replies also published the use of class fees in detail, including: class teaching materials payment, learning and activity expenses: students' learning tools, learning prizes, student physical examinations, first aid drugs, cleaning tools, indoor wall windows and class flowers and plants and other each The arrangement of the item facilities, the production of the class of the class of the class, the traditional festival class activities, the class expansion and other activities; Gorgeous, not only the students' prizes should be bought by themselves, but even the walls and windows in the classroom have to pay for it? Does the school have not collected school fees? Or do you prepare for the "zero cost" to run schools, and all the parents are contributed to one brick and tile?

The reply given by the local municipal government office (picture source: online video screenshot)

According to the "Interim Measures for the Management of General Advanced Middle Schools", in addition to collecting tuition and accommodation fees for ordinary high schools, without the joint approval of the Ministry of Finance, the State Planning Commission, and the National Education Commission or the approval of the provincial people's government, it is no longer allowed to collect any fees from students. Please note that it is any cost, what walls, windows, flowers and plants, and class emblem flags should belong to the category of any cost.

Moreover, the Ministry of Finance has recently issued a newly revised "Financial System of Primary and Middle Schools" with the Ministry of Education, which also clearly stipulates that the charges of primary and secondary schools should strictly implement the scope of charging, charging items and charging standards prescribed by the state. The scope of fees, increased toll projects, and increase the charging standards; the establishment of a "small vault" is strictly prohibited. The schools and authorities involved will not receive this notice without receiving it.

Of course, the school will tell the Education Bureau that the Education Bureau will tell the parents that the money is collected by the family committee and has nothing to do with the school. Neither the class teacher and the class teacher know. However, if you collect money, do you do n’t know so much money? The school takes the family committee as a "white glove", which is inconvenient to charge the family committee. If it is inconvenient to say, let the family committee say that this kind of routine is no stranger.

The accounts in the existing reply are also doubtful. The class charges a total of more than 80,000 yuan. The unified fee of 2636.34 yuan in the school's spring replenishment of textbooks is 2636.34 yuan. Is it in the miscellaneous fee? Why do you want to make up? Since there are already textbooks, why do each child pay more than 800 yuan in operating data costs on average? What are the necessities of about 125 yuan per capita, do children really use it? Do children come to school or come to consume? Moreover, even if you spend money so big, more than 42,000 yuan are left now, so what is the basis for receiving so much money from the beginning? The remaining money is not suitable for staying in the hands of the family committee?

To put it bluntly, the reply given by the local educational and Sports Bureau is to "shake the pot" to the family committee. This is also the embarrassment of the family committee now. When collecting money, it is the "good helper" of the school teacher, which causes public opinion to be "back pot."

For a long time, the family committee has been controversial because of unclear legal status and unclear authority. It cannot be exercised correctly. The school has not really obtained the general consent of the parents. Anxiety, violating the original intention of "double reduction", is very inappropriate from any perspective. I hope that relevant local departments can seriously study and understand relevant regulations, clarify the responsibilities of all parties, and give parents a fair and satisfactory reply.

- END -