Shandong College Evaluation Paper situation was released: 3.59 million reviews, this part was evaluated by Shanda and Shan Shi, 3151 reviewers

Resolutely put an end to the progress and "insurance points"! Shandong 2022 Summer College Entrance Examination Evaluation Paper was released

On the 18th, the Shandong Provincial Education Admissions Examination Institute released the situation of the summer college entrance examination for social attention.

The province's 2022 summer college entrance examination papers were officially launched on June 11. The total number of candidates in the summer college entrance examination was 59,8810, and the total number of reviews of 9 disciplines was 3591992. All subject selection questions are reviewed by machines; the non -choice questions are approved by artificial online reviews, which are borne by two universities of Shandong University and Shandong Normal University. Shandong University evaluation points are responsible for the five disciplines of Chinese, mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology. Volumeist.

Establish a sound evaluation organization mechanism

In order to strengthen the organization and leadership of the evaluation work, the Provincial Department of Education established the Summer College Entrance Examination Paper Committee. Work. The Evaluation Committee has a provincial evaluation office and the leadership group of the Paper Paper, which is responsible for the specific implementation of the college entrance examination evaluation. Before the evaluation papers began, the Provincial Evaluation Committee held a meeting to make a comprehensive deployment of the evaluation work. During the evaluation period, the Provincial Evaluation Office sent the working group on the on -site working group from the Shanda and Shanshi Normal University to be responsible for contacting and guiding and supervising the evaluation of the papers.

Establish a high -level review team

Seize the basic link of the construction of the review team and build a high -level and high -quality evaluation team. The first is the scientific optimization team structure. Adhere to the principle of "suitable for people" and "layered management", and continue to optimize the structure of the evaluation team. The key positions such as the team leader and the leader of the question are high -level discipline experts, professors and senior middle school teachers. The second is to strictly evaluate the selection and hiring management. Middle school teachers' reviewers are strictly reviewed and recommended by the Municipal Education Bureau according to the conditions of the selection. The college teachers are recommended by colleges and universities. The third is to strengthen the education and training of reviewers. The reviewer sent the unit to conduct disciplinary training on the recommended reviewers in advance. After the reporters reported, the evaluation points, the discipline group conducted all -round training and training of all reviewers, legal discipline regulations, and papers. After qualifying.

Multiple measures and strictly put on the quality of the reviews

Effectively ensuring the quality of the papers is the key core of the evaluation work. The first is to rigorously formulate the scientific rules. The scoring rules formulate the responsibility system of the subject team leader. The discipline expert group strictly follows the scoring reference, closely combined with the answer sheet, fully consider the different solutions, ensure the fairness of different solutions, and formulate the scientific rigor to formulate the scientific rules. Lay a solid foundation. All reviewers participated in the trial evaluation carefully, and they were familiar with the grading rules in the trial to ensure that "the standards are unified, the scale is unified, the same is consistent, and the rigorous is consistent." The second is to strictly implement the dual evaluation mechanism. Each test question of all candidates randomly arrange at least two reviewers for reviewers. If the score of the two reviewers exceeds the double evaluation threshold range, three reviews must be performed. Land prevention of misunderstanding, missed evaluation and other subjective deviations to ensure the science and accuracy of the score. The third is to strictly implement the four -level supervision and inspection mechanism. The provincial quality management supervision mechanism for quality management team, subject quality inspection team, question group, and question group was established, strictly controlled the progress of the evaluation, and strictly supervised the quality of the evaluation papers. Real -time statistical analysis of the working conditions of the reviewers, three review rates, and differences in front and rear scoring, etc., focus on the three evaluation papers, full scores, zero scores, and abnormal volumes, and resolutely eliminate the progress and "insurance scores" The occurrence of the situation is scientific and rigorous, and the same is consistent, and the same is consistent.

Strictly abide by the bottom line of security confidentiality

Put the test papers confidentially in the prominent position, and resolutely ensure the "zero accidents" of security and confidentiality. The first is strict secret -related materials management. The scores of each subject are printed by the confidential printed unit number in advance, and shall not be copied. The reference and scoring rules used during the evaluation period, strictly implement the regulations of confidentiality, and register to people in accordance with the management principles of grades management and level one -level responsibility. The second is the management of strictly evaluating the venue. All staff members must perform security inspections and strictly check their identities to prevent taking pictures of mobile phones into the workplace. All evaluation materials are strictly limited to use in the venue of the papers, recycled in time, and prevent them from being brought out. The third is strict candidates' answer sheet information management. All candidates' answering cards evaluated by the evaluation point are stored in an encrypted manner. Strictly evaluate the review authority management. Each reviewer can only see the answer content of the confidential number and the candidate's small questions. details.

Strict implementation of epidemic prevention and control requirements

Put the prevention and control of the Evaluation Epidemium in an important position. According to the characteristics of the evaluation work, scientifically formulate the prevention and control plan for the college entrance examination evaluation, implement the prevention and control measures of the detailed epidemic, and resolutely maintain the bottom line of the epidemic prevention and control.The first is to strengthen the personal protection management of the reviewers.Strict reviewers are selected, all reviewers complete the new crown virus vaccine in vaccination; except for Jinan City, other cities are responsible for sending the "point -to -point" of the reviewers to the designated place for the appraisal point.During the period of work and accommodation, two o'clock one line, arrange a special car "point -to -point" connection.The second is to strengthen the detection of nucleic acid detection.Before the registration, the reviewer conducted two nucleic acid tests within 48 hours and 24 hours; all the reviewers were "daily" during the review period.The third is to strictly implement the prevention and control measures of the epidemic.Establish a special medical and epidemic prevention and control group, strictly do a good job in the equipment equipment equipment, body temperature testing, and place of placement to ensure epidemic prevention safety.The Voice of Tai'an Radio and Television of Tai'an Radio · Rong Media Center

Source: Volkswagen Daily WeChat public account

Responsible editor: Zhu Wenjing

Review: Zhang Dongmei

- END -