Fuzhou's big "grabbing people" should avoid another misunderstanding

Local governments cannot blindly stimulate the inflow of young people with various subsidies and preferential measures. Instead, they must use their energy to build more levels of system construction, respect the spontaneous regulation function of the market, maintain social fairness, and create a place where people's living and employment are more suitable for people's living and employment. Only then will more young people are willing to entrust the future to the city.

Author: Yuanshan

Figure: Tuwa Creative

It's the graduation season again. In 2022, the number of fresh graduates of colleges and universities reached 10.76 million, which created a historical peak. Many young people with education will naturally become talents in various places, especially some non -first -tier cities, and they are even thirsty. Recently, the Fuzhou Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Fujian Province issued the "Notice on Further Doing a Good Accommodation for Graduate Graduates for Jobs", promising to be within three years of graduation (including graduation year). Graduates from students can apply for free accommodation for a maximum of less than one year. Each person is limited to once.

Fuzhou's "grabbing people" can be described as a big deal: the person who enjoys "free accommodation for one year" is qualified to be qualified, not only fresh graduates, but also the full -time colleges and universities within three years of graduation can share this discount. In addition to free accommodation, graduates who meet the conditions of talent reserves can also apply to the local personnel centers to be included in the talent reserves and give corresponding living subsidies. In addition, the conditions for accommodation in each county (city) district can provide free entrepreneurial station support to the graduates.

This condition is very attractive.

However, the first problem facing "one -year accommodation" is the matching of supply and demand. First of all, in the number of housing, the list of free accommodation released by Fuzhou is located in the urban area, and the other housing is provided by the county and town. According to common sense, from the city level to county -level levels, the attractiveness of foreign graduates is decreasing. More graduates are more willing to stay in the city center area to facilitate job hunting and life. The conditions of the county and towns are also relatively simple, which can easily cause large demand for housing in the city to supply tensions. The county and town housing demand is relatively small and cannot be fully utilized.

At the same time, the free accommodation points provided by Fuzhou can be divided into market -oriented housing such as government hostels, business hotels, express hotels, etc., which involves the burden of related rent costs. Obviously, the rent of market -oriented houses cannot be completely reduced, and the cost must be borne by the government. I query on a online travel website in the Guanchun Business Hotel, Luoyuan County, which is included in the free accommodation point. The house fee promotion price of one night in large beds is 105 yuan. If you calculate this, foreign graduates will be 36,000 yuan for one year for foreign graduates to stay in the hotel. Even if the government and the hotel have agreed discounts, the cost is still expensive.

Because of this, whether the free housing is sufficient to support the housing demand of graduates of foreign universities and how much the amount of public financial subsidies is needed, it is two major challenges in front of the relevant Fuzhou departments. Can this "grabbing" account be considered clear? Can the huge costs paid by "grabbing people" be exchanged for the long -lasting stays in foreign graduates, instead of quietly left after a year of "staying"? These require Fuzhou more comprehensive policy supporting facilities, so as not to spend money.

This is a more important proposition -the government role positioning and behavior boundary in the "grabbing" war. The future development of the city depends on absorbing more young talents, thereby improving the allocation and utilization efficiency of human resources, and enhancing the competitiveness of development. This has become the consensus of many cities in China, and it has also become the main reason for the continuous rise in "grabbing" in various places in recent years. Essence

However, "grabbing people", including Fuzhou, should also avoid stepping into another misunderstanding and pursue the flow of graduates from foreign universities one -sided. Essence This approach can easily lead to overspending of public finances. It may even attract a large number of foreign graduates in a short time due to high benefits and high subsidies. The lameness of the "grabbing" policy. Or the policy "rotten" caused by the weighted fiscal, the subsidies were unable to put it in place, and the disappointment of many foreign graduates who came to disappoint the credibility of the policy.

A questionnaire survey for "what kind of cities can retain young people" show that most young people pay most attention to employment and development platforms provided by cities. Local governments cannot blindly stimulate the inflow of young people with various subsidies and preferential measures. Instead, they must use their energy to build more levels of system construction, respect the spontaneous regulation function of the market, maintain social fairness, and create a place where people's living and employment are more suitable for people's living and employment. Only the convenient environment for creators to enter and exit freely, so that more young people are willing to entrust the future to the city.

(Author is senior commentator)

Super major anchors are absent from 618, where the traffic goes, and the Zhengzhou red code incident rectification of excessive epidemic prevention needs institutional guarantee

- END -