Academician Lu Avenue: How to write a good paper?How to put forward new ideas?

Author:Scientific network Time:2022.08.06

Editor

"In recent years, the scientific research work seems to be quite 'prosperous', there are many scientific research projects, there are many academic articles, there are many types of various awards, and there are many talents with the title of" halo ". Few, compared with huge investment, it is extremely incomparable. "

The 83 -year -old academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the famous geographical scientist Lu Aidao in our country bluntly stated that these phenomena are the deviations in the scientific research achievements and scientific and technological talent evaluation standards implemented in the science and education field for many years. Caused by the practice.

So, how to write a good article? How to understand scientific and technological innovation, is there any specific way to follow? Recently, Lu Avenue published the "Awareness of the Study and Innovation Culture" in the Journal of Geography, and answered the aforementioned question in the article. The following is an article selection.

Text ｜ Lu Avenue

About article writing

Scholars always write articles on the basis of research and teaching. In recent years, the misunderstanding of the article on the Internet has misunderstood the misunderstanding of my "SCI as the main thesis". That's it.

Of course, writing papers require quality, and even require innovation, and also requires the writing paradigm of the current scientific journal papers. These requirements have no different opinions to express. The following author should express the views and contents of the author's concept and content text in recent years.

The first thing to write an article is to emphasize the big eyes and start.

The theme choice of an article should be more meaningful, both for society and the development of disciplines. To start with a small place, you need to have the actual content and strict structure, logic and words, which can better express the theme significance determined from the big place.

The writing of the article needs to be clearly targeted, and the theme is repeatedly considered. It is explained by several paragraphs. The structure and the relationship between the front and rear must have strict logic. It is important to write as much as possible; the concept must be accurate, the knife is cut, and the excavation must be deep. Usually, a small theme of each paragraph should be accurate in each natural paragraph, and there are not many text. In this way, part of the part of an organic overall article will be formed.

A academic article must scientifically reveal a certain or more aspect of objective practical things.

Under normal circumstances, it is to make complexity into simple, so that readers can touch and visible, rather than the opposite. They ca n’t find nothing to find words. I wrote a lot of languages, not related to each other, cut a knife everywhere, did not see the blood, and even I didn't know where I wanted to write, which explained what the problem was.

Sometimes articles with important themes. Most of them are about how important this content starts in a section. Dozens of importance. Writing with each other in a serial and curved way, it is not allowed to be visible and practical. Things and its associated text are described as perspective of many object movements and structures inside across the glass.

Some scholars, the articles are published one by one, a lot of references, how to choose, I do n’t know; what the theme is speaking, it is difficult for others to see it; the meaning of the research conclusion may not even be clear. In short, starting from utilitarian and writing articles is now a common phenomenon.

So, how to view the number of articles and the quality of the article?

The former editor -in -chief of Science said, "We know, relying on the number of published articles cannot effectively measure scientific and output. In fact, the incentive mechanism that pays attention to the number of published articles will seriously hinder innovation. It should not be expected to publish articles. Measure the methods of scientists related to the culture of various countries. It is important to maintain a effective science and culture. I will recommend such a system: only one article in each person a year, this article, this article, this article, this article, this article, this article, this article, this article, this article, this article, this article, this article The article should also let everyone read and evaluate carefully, which can be obtained more than a system that only emphasizes the number of articles. When evaluating scientists, it should emphasize quality rather than quantity. "

About scientific and technological innovation

The "new" of innovation is the new ideas, new theories (theory), new methods, and related discourse systems for the development of the discipline in their own studies. When it comes to geography, it should also include new discoveries and new interpretations of spatial affairs in geography, spatial relationships, and the improvement and establishment of the discipline system. Most of the seniors of geography have only revealed the laws and theories of a field, or some new explanations about the connection between the geographical space in a certain aspect of the geographical space. We really need to learn the spirit of some ethnic groups.

How to get innovation, that is, how to discover, put forward new ideas, new theories (theory), and new methods? Of course, the foundation of scientific innovation should be diversified. From the perspective of learning style, I think there are the following aspects:

(1) Reserve on the actual knowledge and related theory of research objects and objects.

Scientific innovation is based on the understanding, disclosure and explanation of objective things and its associations. In the area combination of each object and these objects in the surface phenomenon, it will objectively form or show certain regular patterns, structures and evolution processes.

Of course, these objective laws may be incomplete, even not completely reasonable in most cases. The literacy and vision of our scholars must be able to perceive it, think about it, and analyze it. After summing up, it will be raised to the height of scientific theory and regularity. This is our achievements that can be used to guide practice. (2) We must have rigorous attitude and persistence to innovate. If you have accumulated too much, you can penetrate, you will have new ideas, and you may have innovation.

The development and training of scientific thinking habits, a good combination of professional beliefs with the spirit of science will help summarize the characteristics of practical things, summarize the theoretical framework, and practice confirmation and inspection to explain practical things. Innovation is not necessarily equal to the difference. To summarize the laws and principles in practical things honestly, it is a person who is a learning. It is lightly declared that a certain law and a certain theory have been discovered. The readers, especially within the academic community, will soon be unable to understand and cannot accept it.

(3) Can there be specific methods to follow scientific and technological innovation? With the author's personal observation and superficial experience, it should be "yes."

Examination, accumulation, thinking, structure, interpretation and verification, and induction, of course, even if this is done, it may not be able to achieve innovation. This may be related to the inconsistent understanding of the definition of innovation.

The author's understanding of the "innovation" of scientific research results is relatively broad. For example, for the existing academic thoughts and theories, a new demonstration method and technical route have been proposed, or a new extension or evolution has become a theoretical or ideological of some independent significance. Essence Being able to make outlines of research dynamics (national, scientists, views, and progress) in a major research field, combing and evaluating correctly in accordance with the actual situation, and the correct reviews are also "innovation".

However, whether it is "innovation" for consultation and suggestions to be submitted to the government: that is, (recommendation) economic necessity and rationality, feasibility (economy) in engineering technology, and each that may be related Safety must have sufficient and thorough demonstration.

In addition to the above 3 points, it is also important to emphasize the importance of collecting collective forces. Through the intersection and collision of collective wisdom, it will promote the formation of innovation. Among some scientific researchers, sometimes I see the following two situations, and I think I should pay attention.

① Some scholars have an innovative roadmap or technical roadmap composed of hundreds of lines in the research project application or results, and even their peers cannot argue. In this regard, he may not have a clear and feasible research method and ideas. Because scientific research does not make objective things and associations into particularly complicated, almost unclear, and even become unreasonable debris, it can achieve innovation.

② If a scholar proposed a theory or discovered a law, then he should show his research content in the academic community and what experiments or actual inspections were done for discovering or proposing the theory. For geographical disciplines, what investigations and research have been done, how to understand the knowledge foundations such as domestic and foreign related theoretical achievements and experience; what is the targeted theoretical, or to solve the key issues of actual needs or scientific development; The connotation is systematically explained, whether the theory is gradually recognized or cited by peers, or it has been proven by practice; what summarizes or revelations of the discovery and innovation, and so on. Among them, we must not achieve innovation with some very special and extremely inconsistent concepts with their own concepts.

Edit | Fangyuan

Capture | Zhihai