Zelei supports "Taiwan against the mainland"?Is it a conspiracy, or did he open the river?

"Military and Military Secondary Point" Author: Da Yiwan

At noon on June 13th, Beijing time (on the morning of June 13th), the Russian -Ukraine military conflict has erupted for 109 days.

Yesterday: Some photos confirmed that two road bridges that were originally connected to Nortston and Lixica Sikh were bombed by the Russian army. The remaining bridge was located behind the airport of the Nighton bent. Under the control of the army. Based on this situation, the Russian and Lugusk People's Army announced that the turtles have shrunk in hundreds of Ukraine and mercenaries in the Azatos of the Nighton benthtzk. According to the above news, Daiwan believes that this also means that the Nighton Inton's siege of the Nighton Chinez, which has lasted about half a month, is nearing its end.

At the same time, there is also a very bad news: According to the news of the well -known Russian battlefield reporter in the front line, the news of the Russian army of the Russian army in the Mary Upol Siege and the Russian Black Sea Fleet Independent Guard Navy Infantry 810 Brigade The leading officer of a battalion, the famous "red schoolbag" and "piano strings", recently unfortunately injured in the battle. It has been sent to a military hospital in Moscow for treatment. It is said that the "Red Bag" will have a good overall recovery and will return to the troops in the future. However, considering the injury, the "Red Bag" after returning to the team may turn into a post -work or staff job, which means that we may not see the famous "red schoolbag" on the Russian -Ukraine military conflict battlefield.

Zelei "supports Taiwan"?

In addition to the battle of the Russian -Ukraine military conflict on the 12th, at the Shangri -La dialogue held in Singapore on the 11th, an intriguing episode also occurred: at the dialogue, the organizer did not accidentally arrange Zelei Sky’s’s again. The speech allowed Zeelianzki to talk about ten minutes in front of the participating representatives and media reporters.

After the speech, the media reporter's question session. A column reporter Josh Rogin from Washington Post, Josh Rogin, threw an insidious question to Zelei: "Yesterday, the Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Wento pointed out that 'Ukraine today, Ukraine Things may happen tomorrow's East Asian ', which clearly refers to the Taiwan Strait issue. What do you think of this kind of armed behavior similar to Russia's aggression? "

In the picture, the Red Circle is the American Eagle Anti -China reporter Josh Rogin in the Washington Post

After Josh Rogin throwing this problem, Zeleiski was obviously a little embarrassed. After thinking about it for a while, I responded that today's Ukraine "can be an example of the world" and must use diplomatic means to solve the problem before armed conflicts. Some individuals, "No one will gain profit in the war." At the same time, he also added a sentence that "cannot abandon any weak country" and let those countries that are more powerful in finance, territory and weapons and equipment. To this end, countries should first use diplomatic methods to solve problems instead of remedy afterwards.

Report of the Washington Post

After Josh Rogin was processed, the webpage of the Washington Post became an exclusive interview, and the relevant statements have also become: Ukrainian President Zerrenceki said that the international community said that the international community said that the international community said that It should now help "TW" to resist "Chinese President Volodmmyr ZELENSKY SAID The International Community Should Help Tw Resist Churssion Now.). The news returned to China, and folk public opinion was uproar. After all, foreign leaders who touched the bottom line of China and the red line and hurt the Chinese people's feelings were really unable to find the lanterns.

However, at the same time, some people believe that Zelei's response is obviously "the trap of the American anti -China reporter", which may not mean what he himself. Our provocation of this anti -China journalist is best to turn a blind eye, otherwise it may destroy the "good relationship" of China and Ukraine.

How to think of Zeelianzi's answer

So, how should we recognize the response to American journalist Josh Rogin at the Shangri -La dialogue? Is Zelezky really intentionally violated our red line or just "unintentional losses", should we understand to avoid "hurting China -Ukraine relationships"? Da Ivan personally thinks that this reply from Earth Ball, Nagazawa, is described as three words in general: confused eggs.

You said he knew where the red line was, he faintly knew; but you said he intentionally avoided this red line, and he didn't seem to know. Speaking of Zelei "knowing where the red line is", in this response, there is no specific direction on the bright side. He said that a lot of "must use diplomatic methods to solve the problem before the conflict of force", and also required major countries to ask major countries. "Can't abandon weak countries." These examples, you interpret Ukraine that it is talking about itself, and it seems that there is no problem, and there are indeed many people in our country that are interpreted like this.

Josh Rogin, the American "director", obviously brought a series of "political tasks" to "touch porcelain" Zelezki, not to report the news objectively ...

However, if Zelei really wants to completely avoid "stepping on the line", he actually has a better response strategy, and there are more than one response strategy: the general response strategy is only the first paragraph, the second paragraph does not talk about the second paragraph, not the second paragraph, not the second paragraph. To talk about a lot of the current situation of Ukraine and talk about the necessity of diplomatic solutions, the selling is miserable. Anyway, for San Zelei Sky, it was originally a one -three -five, two, two, four, four, and four, and people asked you the situation in Taiwan. The typical method of playing haha ​​in the field of diplomacy is not offended, and this is the case. In consideration, Crimean has never been acknowledged. If Zediski wants to be more exquisite, then return Crimea to Ukraine and compare it with Taiwan to China: Crimea returns to Ukraine is the Western politics correct. The heart of the people. If Zelei said, it is estimated that fans who support Ukraine on the Internet will instantly burst millions of people. Zelei Sky is even more circle.

With such good response measures, Zelei Sky did not know how to use it. Even if the first paragraph, the second paragraph, the second paragraph also specially added words such as "weak countries" As a result, American reporters directly grabbed the handle. For Da Yili, this really does not blame American journalists to play on the question. You have a problem with your own response. You can jump in a pit. Is it possible for you to use the words "weak country"? Under the context of the American reporter, what does this "country" mean? Of course, Zelei Sky is good, but there is no direct explanation of a certain "country", and there is still room for this matter. However, in any case, in general, it made us feel uncomfortable in our hearts, so Da Yiwan felt that the word "confused egg" was described.

Of course, although Zeelianzki's reply made people difficult, some people scolded, and some were busy returning. But Da Ivan thinks that if we think about it deeper, there is no need to scold or protect it. After all, from the current overall strategy of Ukraine, the attitude towards our attitude is basically a tool person. When the conflict broke out, a lot of copywriting emerged on the Internet, saying how much Ukraine has for us, and how much force has it given to our military modernization. Therefore, it is necessary for us to "report" Ukraine and provide Ukraine to "provide military assistance to provide military assistance to" providing military assistance for military assistance "Yunyun.

The slogans hanging outside the Canadian embassy in Beijing at the time were still controversial ...

At that time, Greater Ivan pointed out that the so -called Ukraine's aid to China and military modernization was essentially the normal cooperation with us in the Soviet era after the disintegration of Ukraine in the Soviet Union. With the gradual passage of these old people in the Soviet Union and the gradual population of the Ukrainian government, especially after the 2014 Color Revolution, the cooperation between China and Ukraine, especially military modernization, has actually fallen into stagnation. To be unsatisfactory, the Ukrainian government after the so -called "McDIC Revolution" in 2014, as before the Ukrainian government before 2014, can no longer be regarded as the same Ukrainian government. This kind of thing is like we are the highest Soviet Soviet Soviet Union, which is the highest Soviet Soviet Union when we just established the new China government for the current Russian government. Isn't this not even grateful to the object.

Especially with 2014 as the boundaries, the Ukrainian government afterwards is generally utilitarian and biased towards the West. Needless to say, the Poroshenko government, at that time, the Poroshenko government introduced Chinese capital, and hoped that Chinese capital could form a certain degree of restrictions on Russia. To this end This government policy is more inclined to the values ​​of the Democratic Party. In terms of foreign policies, there are quite obvious traces of ideological diplomacy. There are two most typical performances: one is at the end of 2020 to shake the dog, and the losing land supports the color revolution of Belarus. As a result, the good black relationship that Poroshenko was played by Poroshenko was gone; the other was to follow last year with it. Behind the assignment of the American assignment in my country.

After the outbreak of the Russian -Ukraine military conflict, President Zessky's ideological diplomacy continued: when all goodness in the early stage of the conflict, when leaders of all countries rushed to the Earth, Nagasarky, Zelei The attitude was once full of anger, announcing "giving us an opportunity to talk to the Western world with equal dialogue". How to equal dialogue, you can talk equal dialogue on sanctions on Russia. The front line is getting worse and worse, and we come back and look forward to we "can exert their influence on Russia" and stop Russia's continued military operations on Ukraine. How about saying that the Earth ball is talking about hard gas, take us as a tool person, there is no Zhong Wuyan, and there is nothing to do with Xia Yingchun, right?

Therefore, from this perspective, Zeelianzki's speech at the Shangri -La dialogue can also be regarded as this earth ball. I love to hear, but China cannot be said to be too explicit, otherwise China will really become Ka Dajo when it is angry. This typical behavior of taking us as a tool person, what do we care about him, you and Russia's own family, you can first talk about ugly Yin 卯.

- END -