Does China admit that Ryukyu belongs to Japan?The Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not recognize the US -Japanese contract, it should be talked about Ryukyu's belonging

As China recently enhanced the cruise of the Diaoyu Island waters and the gradual development of the East China Sea oil and gas resources, the United States couldn't sit still, and re -took out the "San Francisco Contract" to talk to China. Rubin, a senior researcher at the American Institute of Enterprise, said that according to the "San Francisco Contract" signed by the United States and Japan, at the cost of recognition of Japanese sovereignty, Japan and Japan recognize the Korean Peninsula Independence, abandon Taiwan, Penghu, Qiandao Islands, Sakhalin, Nansha Islands, and Nansha Islands, and Nansha Islands. The sovereignty of islands such as the Xisha Islands.

"San Francisco Contract" signed the scene

The United States believes that Japan only "abandon sovereignty" in the "San Francisco Contract", and the People's Republic of China had not obtained the legal seat of the United Nations at that time. Therefore, sovereignty in Taiwan, Penghu and other regions does not belong to China. At the same time, the sovereignty of the Ryukyu Islands still belongs to Japan.

In fact, as early as the "San Francisco Contract" was launched, we made a positive response. The Chinese government said that the Central People's Government believes that the Central People's Government believes that there is no illegal and invalid, so the Central People's Government is absolutely unraorded because there is no preparation, formulation and signing of the People's Republic of China. The United States has recently repeated the "San Francisco Contract", apparently wanting to use this illegal document we do not recognize.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said: "The so -called" San Francisco Harmony "is the United States gathered some countries after World War II. In the case of excluding the people's Republic of China and the Soviet Union, illegal and ineffective documents published alone in Japan. This document. This document. Violation of the "United National Declaration" signed by 26 countries such as China, the United States and Britain in 1942, stipulates that violations of the "United Nations Charter" and the basic principles of international law, and any disposal of any territorial and sovereign rights involving China as a non -part -time country as a non -part -time country. If it is invalid, the Chinese government will never recognize the San Francisco Contract.

This speech from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is actually very interesting, because it does not recognize the effectiveness of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, in fact, it has also questioned the status of the Ryukyu Islands. After all, the United States was transferred to Japan in the name of "hosting" to Japan, which was considered the result of the United States and Japan. From a legal point of view, China has the right to question the legitimacy of Japan's sovereignty on the Ryukyu Islands.

In fact, a lot of countries such as China and the Soviet Union do not recognize the legitimacy of the San Francisco Contract. Because the United States launched the "San Francisco Contract" at that time, it essentially wanted to turn Japan into its "military bridgehead" in the Asia -Pacific region and use Japan to deal with China and the Soviet Union. Therefore, it can be considered that the San Francisco Contract is a farce of the United States and Japan.

What is currently recognized by China is actually "Cairo Declaration" and "Polizan Announcement". The "Cairo Declaration" clearly states that "deprived Japan's islands won or occupied in the Pacific Ocean since the beginning of the World War I started in 1914; , Taiwan, Penghu Islands, etc., return to China. " The "Potsdam Announcement" also clearly stated that "After Japan's surrender, its sovereignty is limited to the islands of the state, Hokkaido, Kyushu, the four countries and the allies."

These two documents were signed by the United States to recognize the law. As a result, the United States is now against the country with the most documents. To put it bluntly, the United States has always had only the "spirit of self -interest" in international affairs, and there is no so -called "contract spirit". For the United States, the United States will obey if the treaty that meets the interests of the United States. If the relevant treaty is not conducive to the United States, the United States will not admit or even tear directly.

Under the interference in the United States, Japan not only did not give up the Ryukyu Islands, but illegally captured and possess for a long time. Moreover, the United States did not make a serious post -war liquidation on Japan. Instead, many Japanese war criminals were released according to their own needs, which caused Japanese militarism to not be thoroughly eliminated. In recent years, the propaganda and encouragement of Japanese right -wing media in recent years, Japan Domestic extreme forces began to rise gradually.

The United States now repeats the illegal document of the "San Francisco Contract". To put it plainly, it is to continue to destruction in the Asia -Pacific region, so as not to allow the Asia -Pacific region to continue to develop peacefully and steadily.

In fact, even the Ryukyu people themselves are very dissatisfied with Japan. In the decades of illegal occupation of Ryukyu's sovereignty in Japan, the Ryukyu people have not been fully treated by the Japanese government. Many policies formulated by the Japanese government have obvious discrimination against the Ryukyu people. Therefore, the Ryukyu independence movement has intensified, and the Ryukyu people are also eager to go out independently from the illegal rule of Japan.

If the United States really wants to talk about the "contract spirit", it should abide by its commitments in the Cairo Declaration and Polizan Announcement, and do not recognize the Japanese government's illegal occupation of the sovereignty of the Ryukyu Islands, and give the Ryukyu people's independence right This is not only the practice of promised by the United States, but also to fully protect the demands and rights of the Ryukyu people.

Picture source network, invading deletion.

- END -