Overseas online review: big "technical terrorism", the United States will eventually block its own way

In Ma'anshan, Anhui, workers are producing chips. (Source: Visual China)

According to Bloomberg reported on July 6, the United States is pressured by the Dutch government to demand that the world's largest optical machine company, Asml (ASML) to expand its scope of ban on China. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian responded to this that this is another example of the United States abused national power and relying on technical hegemony to engage in "coercion diplomacy", which is a typical technical terrorism.

Coincidentally, on July 5, local time, the New York Times quoted some American officials as saying that the Bayeng government was planning to deal with Russia's "experience" to deal with China, trying to expand the export restrictions on China, hindering China Military and technological development. According to media reports such as the Wall Street Journal, the White House is considering the "301 survey" of the so -called "industries that have been subsidized by the Chinese government" based on the "US Trade Law" and the so -called "industries that have been subsidized by the Chinese government" including semiconductor and batteries. These "small actions" show that although the Bayeng government claims that the United States does not seek conflict or a "new cold war", does not seek to prevent China from playing the role of a large country, nor does it seek to prevent China's economy and promote the interests of the people, but what they think in their bones still think about it, but they still think about it. It is the purpose of using the "small courtyard high wall" strategy to accurately combat China's high -tech industry and achieve the purpose of "technical blockade" and "technical decoupling" in China.

Over the past years, the United States has been using national power to crack down on countries and enterprises that may challenge the United States in key technologies. Taking the semiconductor field as an example, in the 1980s, the rise of the Japanese semiconductor industry and the impact on the relevant U.S. industries. The U.S. government frequently waved the "301 survey" stick, eventually forcing Japan to open the semiconductor market, and the Japanese semiconductor industry " "The night before the technical update was renewed.

How can the United States be soft to the United States? Since the Biden government came to power, the United States has continuously increased the Chinese measures on high -tech, industrial chain and supply chain. For example, in June 2021, Biden signed an administrative order to include 59 Chinese companies in the investment "blacklist"; the U.S. government repeatedly excuses the so -called human rights issues in Xinjiang to impose sanctions on Chinese solar, single crystal silicon and biotechnology companies; the United States The two hospitals of the Congress passed the bill, advocating restrictions and even cutting off the exchanges between China and the United States, and intended to block Chinese scientific and technological progress by blocking. This kind of waving trade investigation and sanctional sticks will expose American hegemonism mentality.

However, in the context of economic globalization, the United States has repeatedly political, economic and trade issues politicized, tooling, and ideologicalization, and may eventually end the end of "stealing chickens and not eclipse". The abuse of sanctions and trade protectionism in the United States will not only have a negative impact on the global supply chain and industrial chain, but also bring a lot of losses to the United States itself. The New York Times warned that extensive export control may cause severe damage to global business, and also prompt China to restrict some key products supplied to the United States. In the long run, the widespread use of control measures may promote foreign customers to find other sources of supply, thereby weakening the leading position and market dominance of the United States. Martin Jason, a senior researcher at the Institute of International Economic Research Institute of the US Think Tank, warned that many countries that have a deep trade relationship with China may resist the United States' efforts to implement export control in China.

American politicians, who are obsessed with the old dream of hegemony, seem to have been selectively ignored such a fact: Although the United States has been using various means in the past few decades, it has never stopped China from making great achievements in high -tech fields. In order to limit the development of Chinese aerospace technology, the United States used the "Wolf clause" to ban Chinese scientists from participating in Chinese aerospace scientific research activities. Today, China's "Shenzhou" asks heaven, "Chang'e" to take the moon, "Beidou" refers to the road, "Zhu Rong" to explore fire, "羲" one by day, "Tianhe" to travel stars, and will also complete the Chinese space station this year. In rail construction, the blockade of the United States could not stop the advancement of Chinese aerospace. The same story, I believe it will continue to be staged.

The United States' "technical blockade" and "technical decoupling" of other countries will only make other countries more alert, and will also promote countries to accelerate the realization of technology independence and self -reliance. In an attempt to block the path of others, it will eventually only block your own way. (Nie Shi)

- END -