Japan's "Izumo" has transformed into a standard aircraft carrier!Will my country's 075 attacks be made in similar kinds?

"Military and Military Secondary Point" Author: Lu Yan

In the past June, the Izumo carrier in Japan carried F35B to participate in joint exercises, and in the future, it mainly targeted in the Asia -Pacific region. As early as October last year, the Izumo conducted a F35B take -off and landing test, and the effect was good. This news has made many people start paying attention to the development of the Japanese Maritime Self -Defense Force, and is also worried that the ship will threaten our safety. Considering that Japan is quite simple to have strong combat aircraft carriers, how much does it mean to use vertical take -off and landing fighters on amphibious attack ships? There are similar 075 amphibious attack ships in my country, and there are even rumors that my country will build an improved version of the 076 amphibious attack ship. Is it necessary for my country to use this method to take off ship carrier aircraft?

▲ Picture source: Network

The carrier -based aircraft with an amphibious attack ship is not a fresh thing. After the British -style combatant attack aircraft was developed in the UK, the British army conveniently pulled this fighter to its own light aircraft carrier, and turned into a sea fighter fighter aircraft. And it performed well in the British Ama Island War. After realizing the advantages of vertical take -off and landing fighters, the United States also introduced the Haiyu fighter, named the AV8 series, mainly equipped with its own amphibious attack ship. However, the United States uses vertical take -off and landing carrier -based aircraft mainly for the attack of the Marine Corps. People are independent arms. Of course, the United States has also considered using an amphibious attack ship to carry vertical take -off and landing fighters into a so -called sea -making ship, but this is also the idea of ​​a special historical period. After all, the United States has more than 10 super aircraft carriers. How many emergency tastes of take -off and landing fighters.

▲ The concept of sea -making in the United States. Image source: network

India, Spain and Thailand, including the United Kingdom, are actually subject to the fighter itself, so they can only use vertical take -off and landing fighters and small tonnage aircraft carriers. In the past, such aircraft carriers were quite fighting, but from today's perspective, its tonnage is not even as good as my country's 055 destroyer. Coupled with the fighter fighter, the enthusiasm of the world's countries on the development of vertical take -off and landing fighters has been greatly reduced. Such aircraft carriers have no suitable carrier -based aircraft.

▲ Picture source: Network

The real change comes from the F35 project, this is F35B. When the F35B really came out, the aircraft carrier began to develop in these directions. For the United States, the F35B directly replaces the previous AV8B attack aircraft, which can not only conduct air combat or on -ground attack missions. The Marine Corps finally has an advanced fighter above the mainstream level. The United Kingdom is more interesting. In the name, a carrier they think of the world's second, but the very rare slide deck is used to take off with vertical landing, which has weakened the F35B's combat capability to a certain extent. Essence But then again, not using F35C itself is a compromise, so this is also the only choice for the unique family.

Italy and Turkey are different in Spain. The so -called aircraft carrier they chose is generally called a strategic delivery ship. In essence The garage can transport armored troops, and has a very good ability to put in force. The most suitable carrier -based aircraft of this type of aircraft carrier is naturally F35B, which is not a problem against the Air Force fighters against other countries.

▲ The so -called multi -purpose aircraft carrier is a choice of cost and difficulty in small countries. Image source: network

It can be seen that Europeans emphasize multi -purpose capabilities. After all, what they want is that a warship can complete multiple tasks. But Japan is different, and Japan obviously obtains an aircraft carrier in the curve. Although the methods of these countries are very similar on the surface, the ultimate goal is different. The Japanese knew about the advantages of the aircraft carrier during World War II, so they wanted to bypass the bars to obtain the aircraft carrier. Use the straight deck amphibious attack ship to carry F35B is the most direct, simple and effective way, and Izumo is also called a multi -purpose destroyer. This is the same as the Soviet aircraft cruiser. Although there are many articles on the Internet analyzing the strength of such warship decks is not enough to carry F35B, in the final analysis, this is only a problem of materials and design. It is not difficult to solve. , Even the real stealth carrier aircraft. Therefore, Japan has an aircraft carrier in a way that is not difficult, and it is equipped with an advanced F35B, which is of great significance for improving the strength of the Japanese Maritime Self -Defense Force.

▲ Picture source: Network

Speaking of which, everyone can naturally see that my country obviously does not need to do so, because the premise of these countries is that the United States has developed a ready -made F35B for them, and this aircraft is not available in my country. If you trace the roots, the United States has developed F35B mainly because of so many countries, but that its own naval marine team must have an advanced vertical take -off and landing fighter. From the Liaoning ship to the emergency Shandong ship, to the large -step development of the 003 aircraft carrier and the future target ship, we can see that the development direction of my country's aircraft carrier follows and intends to surpass the United States. The carrier -based aircraft is an advanced and powerful J -35 fighter. It is not comparable to the strange aircraft such as F35B, and the only advantage has become a strong structure.

▲ You can't help but pay attention, but you can't take it too seriously. Image source: network

If my country is going to develop vertical take -off and landing carrier -based aircraft for amphibious attack ships, it is not impossible. The main problem is that the Marine Corps is a very obvious army of attack attributes. Ship, then this means that the Marine Corps of our country will become a powerful role similar to the US Marine Corps. In the short term, it is not realistic. 075 As long as a large number of helicopters are used with the carrier -based carrier -based unit of the new aircraft carrier, the combat strength is far from the small and medium -sized amphibious attack ships used by these countries plus the F35B fighter.

As for what Japanese uses F35B from the deck, it belongs to the Pandora Magic Box, which is not at all. As mentioned earlier, these countries can do it. The core is that the US F35B fighter is. F35C and the sixth generation machine in the future. After all, the pseudo -aircraft carrier cannot be compared with the real aircraft carrier. The fighter and warships that were originally more ribbon would not become an epoch -making weapon because of the Japanese. my country is clarifying its own aircraft carrier development direction. These countries are still playing with curves. Core thinking and competitiveness are much worse.

▲ Picture source: Network

- END -