The Prime Minister Australia will provoke China while "reconcile" with China: you should learn the lessons of Putin

After Australian Prime Minister Albanis took office, China -Australia relations seem to have a turnaround, and the outside world also speculates that Sino -Australian relations are expected to thaw. However, from the recent period of time, the Australian side has obviously insufficient sincerity in eased Sino -Australian relations. In essence, it still wants to "eat while smashing the pot."

According to a reference news, Australian Prime Minister Albanis mentioned the "strategic failure" of Russia in an interview with Russia. Then China said that China should learn from it.

Not to mention that Russia still has the initiative of military operations, and has not been isolated by the international community. It is impossible to talk about the so -called "strategic failure". It is just that this matter itself has nothing to do with China.

The practice of Albanis's forced into porcelain shows that the Australian side does not even plan to correct the mistakes of his predecessor.

Albanis stated in this interview this time. In this occasion, some things can be said to be said without saying that this is either a joint statement or an interview.

In the absence of external pressure, Albanis touched porcelain China, which is obviously to please the United States and give a name for the United States. Can a country that pleases the United States by touching porcelain may ease the relationship with China? Here is a big question mark.

When Albanis took office, the door adjustment was really not low in terms of relations with China. At the subsequent Shangri -La Summit, China -Australia Defense Director also held a meeting. This is the first meeting in the high -level Sino -Australian executives in recent years.

On the day of the meeting of the China -Australia Defense Minister, Albanis also wanted to call China and improve bilateral relations. Judging from these methods of Australia alone, it seems to want to restore Sino -Australian relations. In fact, it can be carried with a lot of private goods.

For example, the China -Australian Defense Ministerial Conference, as a military representative, talked about trade. It shows that the purpose of the Australian side to ease relations with China is to restore trade, and it can even be said that it only wants to restore the trade relationship with China.

When Albanis shouted to improve the relationship, he also requested that China needs to lift "sanctions" against Australia. China does not have "sanctions" Australia, and Albanis is wrong in itself, and his purpose is still in trade, hoping to restore trade.

Aside from these details, from the actual action, the Australian side has not done anything to improve bilateral relations, and it is more to stay on the mouth.

The Albanis authorities did not do less about China during this time. Earlier, they sent military planes to South China Sea to provoke, and they were very radical provocative behaviors, which were repeatedly driven by us.

After that, Albanis repeatedly hyped the matter. Now Albanis has pleased the United States through touching porcelain, and this involves another thing that is related to Chinese sovereignty, indicating that his heart is very bad.

In addition, Albanis investigates a contract between China Enterprises and the Port of Darwin, Australia. During the Morrison period, the Australian side had investigated and did not find out problems. Now Albanis has to be re -investigated just after taking office, which is not a way to ease the relationship.

Therefore, Albanis is still a "dinner and smashing pot". There is no essential difference between his predecessor Morrison. It is said to be "reconciled".

Sino -Australian cooperation is conducive to two countries, and it is conducive to the people of the two countries. The Australian side unilaterally destroys Sino -Australian relations and harms others. What the Australian side should do is to correct your mistakes and treat China correctly, rather than a stroke for your own US interests.

Australian leaders need to understand that they represent the interests of the Australian people, and they must be well -known for Australians, rather than the American spokesperson for the United States.

Therefore, Albanis should learn from the lesson, do more things that are conducive to the Australian people, and do more things that conform to the interests of Australia, otherwise they will repeat the mistakes of Morrison.

##

- END -