Do you even think Lithuania?

Even French and even Lithuania suspected NATO's "excessive attention to China" because "NATO countries did not have any direct border with China."

Thousands of protesters on the streets of Madrid, as well as the banner of "Don't NATO, don't fight, for peace" banners they held, failed to stop the United States from leading its allies to officially enter the "NATO Summit Time" and concentrate their spearheads. Metrimize Russia and China.

The NATO Fast Course has expanded to eight times, focusing on the overall defense of the Eastern Conference territory from Russia's "the most direct threat" ... This summit will make some decisions, which was rendered by NATO Secretary -General Stoltenberg into " A historic turn. "

If the opinions of NATO member states are quite consistent in the direction of Russia, then they are ready to list China as "systemic challenges", even French and Lithuania are suspicious of "excessive attention to China" because the "NATO countries have no countries in NATO countries. Any direct border with China ".

An American issue scholar broke in a word. This NATO Summit also regarded China as a major issue, mainly because the United States wanted to contain China ’s intentions to the ally to the Atlantic Ocean. But Europe's current priority is to consolidate its own defense and deal with the Ukraine crisis.

Major European countries do not want to diversify their strengths. They are not surprising that they are "differences" from the United States on the word -related wording of China.

But Washington is obviously an iron -hearted to lead NATO to Asia Pacific.

Japan, South Korea, Australia, Australia, and other Asia -Pacific countries, which should not have appeared at the Madrid Summit, and other high -profile participants, they continued to try to stir up the security issues of Asia Pacific and Europe. This is in the United States.

01

Beginning on the 28th, the political agenda of leaders of major western countries began to turn to the "NATO Summit Time" this week. The spoiler of this summit is clearer.

The scale of NATO's rapid reaction force will be expanded to nearly 8 times. Before the summit, such a message has released a strong smell of gunpowder for Russia.

NATO Fast Anti -Fast Force's active number is 40,000. NATO Secretary -General Stoltenberg said at a press conference on the 27th that it was ready to expand the "highly alert state" troops to more than 300,000 people to better defend NATO's East Wing.

Many changes in this NATO Summit have been crowned with "first" and "biggest" and other words.

New measures such as the rapid expansion of fast -moving troops are also known as "the greatest reform of NATO collective defense and deterrence since the Cold War."

The British Financial Times even described that NATO decided to increase the deployment of military in Russia and shifting the focus to the territory of the allies. It was "a historic change in the post -Cold War" because NATO once reduced military expenditures and withdraw troops from Eastern Europe.

The specific description of China is said to have not yet reached an agreement.

NATO will be written in China for the first time at the Madrid summit for the first time. The news has been floating in international public opinion for a long time. U.S. officials have also been trying to contribute to the atmosphere of China, revealing that NATO strategic documents will use "strong wording" to China. In the words of the American Guoan consultant, Shalvan, "talking about the challenges brought by China in an unprecedented way."

However, the summit was really about to be opened, but NATO was "different."

A NATO diplomat told Reuters that NATO member states have not unified opinions on how to describe China and China -Russia relations.

Needless to say, the United States and Britain strive to promote the use of tougher use to the use of China to reflect their so -called "concerns" of Chinese military development and Taiwan issues. However, European countries such as France and Germany should believe that it should be more seminated and more cautious. French President Macron had previously warned that NATO should not be dispersed and form a "prejudice" in the relationship with China.

Some mainstream media reports in the United States and Europe report that NATO is discussing a discount plan to describe China as "systemic challenges" to avoid words such as "opponents". Specifically, the documents may be accusing China in several aspects such as network security and false information, key infrastructure control, and rules -based international order.

At the regular press conference of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs today, Bloomberg reporters also specifically asked NATO to label China on a "systemic challenge" label. My Foreign Ministry spokesman immediately responded:

We solemnly ask NATO to stop spreading the false words and provocative remarks on the Chinese side immediately. What NATO should do is to give up the approach to the Cold War, zero -harmony game, and create an enemy. Chaos all over the world.

NATO has continuously emphasized that the Madrid Summit was "meaningful." From the perspective of the new strategic concept documents that are about to be announced.

This is considered to be the most important working document after the NATO Organization's 1949 "North Atlantic Convention". The previous version was reached in 2010. At that time, China was not mentioned at the time, and Russia was also known as "partner".

But ten years later, the updated new version of the documents have clearly positioned Russia as the most direct threat to NATO's "security, values ​​and rules -based international order." China has also become a "systemic challenge" that NATO needs to respond first under the leadership of the United States.

But German media reports have a satisfactory detail:

Even Lithuania, which has the old -fashioned high -ended issue in Taiwan in the past two years, has expressed concerns about NATO's "over -attention China". Both Lithuania and Portuguese diplomats say that China is different from Russia, and "NATO countries do not have any direct border with China."

The attitude of European powers and even Lithuania, such as France, also exposed Washington's intention to contain China to allies, which caused suspicion and controversy within NATO. 02

There is also a highlight of this NATO summit, which is the meeting of the leaders of the three countries of the United States, Japan and South Korea.

This is after 4 years and 9 months. These three countries have held leaders' talks again, and their leaders have changed.

Judging from the current media breaking news, strengthening the cooperation of the Three Kingdoms in response to the threat of North Korea, checking in China at the security and economic level, and improving Korean relations are the three major issues of the US -Japan -Korea leaders' meeting.

The first two items are well understood.

North Korea's nuclear issue is South Korea's core appeal. Since May, the three countries of the United States, Japan, and South Korea have successively held close communication on how to deal with the North Korean nuclear issues such as foreign ministerial meetings, chief representative conferences of the North Korea nuclear issues, deputy foreign ministerial meetings, and defense -level conferences.

The topic of China -related issues is the main concern of Tokyo. Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Kana has contacted Russia and Ukraine more than once, rendering that "today's Ukraine may be East Asia tomorrow."

Moreover, in accordance with the logic of continuing the G7 summit theory, Kishida will indeed once again emphasize the so -called "severe security environment" in East Asia, reiterating that "in the Indo -Pacific area, the attempt to unilaterally change the status quo is continuing and strengthening." I am afraid that no one will question that Kishida's remarks are targeted at China.

As for the improvement of South Korea -Japan relations, most of Seoul and Tokyo are estimated to see the American face walk through the field.

After all, since Yin Xiyue came to power, the friction between South Korea and Japan has not been alleviated around historical issues such as comfort women and mandatory labor. At the end of May, the South Korean marine survey ship conducted investigations near the waters near the "Dok Island" (known as "Bamboo Island"), which also led to a strong protest in Japan.

Of course, you can't say full. Whether South Korea and Japan really put on hold of historical disputes and reality because of the active promotion of the United States, it remains to be observed.

There is a very interesting phenomenon, that is, Seoul made words on the topic of China -related issues early: "have nothing to do with South Korea."

The Presidential Office of South Korea said: "Our attention is not in the category of" comprehensive security "in economic, climate change, and emerging technologies."

The problem is that after the meeting between the meeting in May, the second time after the meeting of the Han and American leaders wrote the "Pay attention to the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea" into a joint statement. The leaders of the United States, Japan and South Korea are expected to talk about the specific plan for the "Indo -Pacific Economic Framework". A reasonable speculation is that the leaders of the three countries are likely to directly or indirectly speak for the so -called "Chinese threat".

Some Korean media have seen this set of "Suspected Self -Sthematics" in Seoul: "The invited Yin Xiyue government argued that it was not anti -Russia and anti -China. it's the same."

Like Korean and Japanese leaders, the Asia -Pacific countries at the NATO summit, as well as Australia and New Zealand.

Australia and New's attention will also be concentrated on Russia and Ukraine's conflict and the growth of China's influence. This is not surprising.

Especially in Australia, it was relatively speechless in the Western small circle. With the "Indo -Pacific Strategy" in the United States, Canberra suddenly felt his own use and eagerly active on the international stage.

03

Whether it is Han, Japan, or Australia and New, they have a sign of signs of NATO.

In April this year, NATO held a foreign minister meeting. For the first time in 12 years, the strategic direction and action guide for the first time in 12 years, and for the first time, the "Chinese factor" was considered. At this meeting, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand were invited to the NATO Foreign Minister's venue.

On May 5th, South Korea officially joined the NATO network defense center. This is the first time the agency has expanded members to countries outside Europe, which means that South Korea has joined NATO's network security alliance system.

Behind this series of actions is actually the United States promoted.

An American expert pointed out that it released a very negative trend, that is, "NATO Globalization", which is the globalization of the Western Alliance.

The two core pillars of "NATO Globalization" are "NATO Asia Pacific" and "Asia -Pacific NATO".

The United States continues to arch fire in Europe for the need to safeguard its global interests, and then disaster the eastward, adhere to the role of promoting NATO to regions outside Europe, trying to construct the security pattern of "Asia -Pacific NATO" dominated by the United States.

And more and more NATO member states are subjectively promoting the inherent impulse to promote "NATO Asia Pacific": they believe that only in the Asia -Pacific region, can they have global influence.

In the case of the United States and NATO turns, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and other countries have their own small abacus, and the Asia -Pacific region is likely to present negative situations such as generalization of national security, artificially creating contradictions, and increasing unrestrained countries. This will be disastrous for the stability and development of any region country.

The latest issue of the United States "Foreign Policy" gives more pessimistic forecasts: "A very different cold war is beginning", "The new front is delineated, and it may continue the time of generations ..."

We have seen that NATO's eastward expansion that the United States has strongly promoted has led to a tragedy of returning to large divisions and great confrontations in Europe. If the "NATO Globalization" or "NATO Asia Pacific" brings the consequences, it will only be unbearable in any region.

Data-nickName = "Global Network" Data-ALIAS = "Huanqiu-COM" Data-SIGNATURE = "The World is wonderful!" Data-from = "0" /> Source:

- END -