"China proposes strong protests"

"If you let the Three Kingdoms' pretend to be the cooperation of the Three Kingdoms nuclear submarines, the abduction of the secretary office will be reduced to the 'Trok Trojan" of the "whitewashed' nuclear diffusion act and exemption from the cooperation of the Three Kingdoms nuclear submarines. The common interests of the international community, including all member states. "

On the 15th local time, the International Atomic Energy Institution Council, under a separate formal issue that China promoted the settings and the four negotiations of member states, discussed the issue of cooperation between the United States and the United States and the United States and Australia nuclear submarines. This is expressed like this.

He said that China ’s“ seven issues ”of the United States and British and Australian nuclear submarines at the meeting have been generally echoed by the majority of member states. This "seven issues" include public opinion wars that are fighting for the "original crime" of the Three Kingdoms to dilute their own acts of "original sin", as well as their political manipulation of related institutions.

According to the US media, "Okus" cooperated to expose the dual standards of Washington, that is, Australia allows Australia to obtain nuclear -powered submarines, but it has a strong stance on Iran's nuclear plan. "The United States and Britain and Australia insisted on carrying out nuclear submarine cooperation. They condemned the international community three times and fell into a derived. It was not only the reputation of the country, but also the precious trust and solidarity between countries." The European Times commented on the 15th.

From September 12th to 16th, the International Atomic Energy Agency Council Meeting was held in Vienna. (IC Photo)

"Seven issues"

Native

From the 12th to 16th, the International Atomic Energy Agency Council held a closed -door meeting in Vienna, Austria. At the meeting specializing in the cooperation between the United States and British Nuclear submarines, the majority of member states expressed serious concerns about the "seven major issues" of the Three Kingdoms nuclear submarine. On the 15th local time, Ambassador Wang Qun listed the "seven major issues" in an interview with Chinese and foreign reporters:

First, the Three Kingdoms use the so -called "naval dynamic pile" as an excuse to avoid the illegal transfer of the cooperation of the Three Kingdoms involving the illegal transfer of nuclear weapons materials. The problem of "naval power stack" involved is essentially nuclear diffusion behavior.

Second, the three countries confuse military activities and nuclear diffusion within the scope of the sovereignty of a country. The cooperation of nuclear submarines in the Three Kingdoms is not a simple problem of nuclear materials involved in self -developed military ships in sovereign countries. Instead, it is the first time that the nuclear weapon materials that are publicly transferred from nuclear weapons and directly to non -nuclear weapons are accused. The two cannot be confused.

Third, the Three Kingdoms misleaded public opinion by the so -called "nuclear material sealing in reactors, and it was not directly used in nuclear weapons" and was completely unreasonable. In fact, the problem of cooperation between the Three Kingdoms nuclear submarine is prolonged, not how to deal with the related nuclear weapon materials. In view of the essence of its nuclear diffusion, the three countries cannot reduce the risk of nuclear security, nuclear security and nuclear diffusion.

Fourth, the Three Kingdoms, especially Australia, violate the application obligations stipulated by the institution to comprehensively guarantee the supervision agreement and the relevant statement. In the past year, Australia has officially announced that the cooperation between the Three Kingdoms has not made any substantial reports to the institution in the past year, and it has violated its legal obligations to ensure supervision.

Fifth, the Three Kingdoms openly determine the relevant guarantee supervision plan directly with the institutional secretaries. The cooperation between the three countries' nuclear submarines creates a bad precedent for nuclear diffusion and exceeds the category of guaranteeing the supervision system. All member states of the institution must be discussed together. All member states of the institution must have the right to speak.

Sixth, the Three Kingdoms damage agencies' anti -diffusion functions and authority, and the abduction of the secretariat to engage in the activities prohibited by the "Statue". The Three Kingdoms attempts to coerce the Secretariat to propose a guarantee supervision plan for exemption from the cooperation of nuclear submarines in the Three Kingdoms, and then forcibly promote the passage of the council with its own voter advantages in the council, so as to legalize its illegal spread. Chinese support agencies strictly follow the provisions of Article 2 of the Period, and relevant budgets shall not be used to support activities that support military purposes.

Seventh, the Three Kingdoms always refused to report the substantial progress of the cooperation of nuclear submarines to the institution on the grounds of "unstented cooperation plan", so that the director and secretariat could not make a substantial report on the Three Kingdoms to the council, and it was impossible to effectively fulfill the agency " The report obligations stipulated in the Period.

"China proposes strong protests"

Native

"China has proposed a strong protest." Hong Kong's "South China Morning Post" reported on the 14th that Grossi, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, recently submitted a written report to the Institutional Council on the U.S. -British and Australian nuclear submarine cooperation issues. Call for the director of the head of the head of the head of the fire, endorse the nuclear diffusion of the Three Kingdoms.

According to Reuters, this written report said that on the basis of technical consultations and exchanges with the parties of "Oukus" to date, the international atomic energy agency is satisfied with their participation. The report quoted the Australian side that the form of related materials could not be used for nuclear weapons without chemical treatment. Australia did not need the corresponding nuclear facilities and would not seek ownership.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning said this week that the report of the Director -General quoted the statement of the United States and Britain and Australia to justify its own behavior. It is not mentioned that the international community has a significant concern of the risk of nuclear diffusion in the cooperation between the Three Kingdoms of nuclear submarines. The strict position of the purpose and purpose of the Nuclear Treaty (NPT) (NPT) (NPT), and the rights to observe the misleading conclusions that the matters that should have discussed by institutional member states.

Australia Broadcasting Corporation said on the 16th that China has been voice -over in the international community against nuclear submarine cooperation against the United States, Britain, and Australia, and believes that this has promoted the regional arms competition. In addition to China, there are also other nuclear non -diffusion advocates who have raised serious concerns about "Okus" and believed that it created a dangerous precedent. American dual standard: "Okus" is okay, Iran can't do it

Native

"China believes that the United States has adopted double standards on the Iran nuclear agreement." Bloomberg, USA on the 15th, said on the 15th that China warned that due to the different anti -diffusion standards adopted by Iran and the United States, the global rules for prohibiting nuclear weapon diffusion faced the face of the global rules of the proliferation of nuclear weapons facing the face. risk. Ambassador Wang Qun said in an interview that Western countries hope that Iran restricts nuclear fuel reserves and uses it as the recovery of the Iran nuclear agreement in 2015 and the conditions for relieving comprehensive economic sanctions. But at the same time, the United States and Britain plans to export a large number of weapon -level high -thick uranium to Australia.

The report quoted Wang Qun's statement that such "dual standards" approach means that the efforts or beginning disintegration of restricting nuclear weapons for half a century may promote the cross -nuclear threshold of various countries. The related approach of the United States will prevent the dams of the nuclear diffusion from being placed in the risk of collapse.

Bloomberg said that the United States Permanent Representative to Vienna, Volcott, claimed that China has associated the Iran nuclear agreement with the United States and the United States and the United States, Britain, and Australia. She responded on the phone that the relevant practices of Iran and Australia "do not have double standards". The former "has a history of not obeying the obligations of security and guarantee, and the Australian side has never had a record of not observing such obligations." Walcott said that unlike Iran, the reason why Australia needs submarine fuel is because it has not yet established uranium concentrated industrial capabilities.

Wang Qun recently said in an interview with the new media column of the People's Daily's overseas version of "Xia Ke Island" that the Nuclear weapon country has openly exported nuclear weapon materials to non -nuclear weapons countries since the "Non -diffusing Nuclear Treaty Treaty" was reached. Not only the large number of outputs, in terms of concentrated uranium abundance, the United States and Britain directly exported more than 90%of the weapon -level high -thick uranium to Australia, far exceeding its 3.67%red line for Iran.

The US "National Interest" also published an article at the end of August that the cooperation of "Okus" exposed Washington's dual standards, that is, Australia allows Australia to obtain nuclear -powered submarines, but has a tough stance on the Iran nuclear plan. The article also mentioned that in the 1980s, the United States had obstructed France and Britain to sell nuclear -powered submarines to Canada on the grounds of not spreading. Now, it has decided to provide nuclear -powered submarines to Australia, which indicates that the country's heart is safely distorted the nuclear according to its preferences' preferences. No diffusion mechanism.

"There are still many cases of dual standards on the nuclear issue in the United States." Guo Xiaobing, director of the Military Control Research Center of the Chinese Institute of Modern International Relations, told the reporter of the Global Times on the 16th that, for example, to provide the Britain with sea -based nuclear force, and through a kind of through a kind of through a kind of Special policies have developed hydrogen bombs to develop hydrogen bombs to France. The expert said that in order to rationalize its dual -standard behavior, the United States often preach the so -called anti -proliferation records when speaking to the outside world, but in fact, it is come out".

The United States "how much reputation can be guaranteed"?

Native

On September 15 last year, the leader of the United States and Australia and Australia announced a high -profile announcement of the Three Kingdoms decision to form "Oukus". "One year later, did Southeast Asia have recovered the attitude towards 'Okus'?" The Australian Institute of International Policy in Australia said on the 15th, a year ago, the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs "deeply concerned" about the region's military reserve competition, Malaysian -level officials expressed concerns, saying that this may "cause tensions between the world's superpower." Nowadays, concerns about nuclear diffusion have not disappeared. In the document submitted to the evaluation meeting of the "Non -diffusion Nuclear Weapon Treaty" last month, Indonesia officially proposed its own doubts, that is, the risk of sharing nuclear technology that drives the submarine may increase the risk of new large -scale killing weapons. Similar concerns seem to be widely recognized by Vietnam, Thailand and other countries.

The article said that in ASEAN countries, "Oukus" was described as "alarm clock", it was "marginalized", "excessive" by "publicity", and it was considered to lead to "pushing ASEAN to strategy to have nothing to do with tightness. Geographical strategic competition of the situation.

According to the French "European Times" on the 15th, in the face of the criticism and questioning of the international community on "Okus", the United States claims that it has only assisted Australia to build nuclear submarines. However, how much reputation can be guaranteed in the United States, which is inferior to the United States on the issue of nuclear diffusion? In recent years, the United States has withdrawn from the "Guide Treaty" and has vigorously promoted the modernization of nuclear forces. The Bayeng government "flashed its words" on the use of nuclear weapons in the new version of the "Nuclear Situation Evaluation Report". It can be said that the United States has become the world's largest source of nuclear threats.

Wang Qun said in an interview with the media that the global security generally means security. In recent years, the United States has continuously destroyed the contract and retired, and has withdrawn from major military control treaties such as the "Guide Treaty" and "Open Sky Treaty". The circle, especially the "Oukus" agreement, involves nuclear diffusion, which pose a major threat to the global universal security and regional security. In China, there are even countries around China that have begun to follow suit, which is very harmful. ▲

Special reporter in Austria, Xia Xue, reporter, Ding Yazang Chen Xin Liu Yupeng

- END -