Very unusual, China launched three consecutive strikes!

Writing/Li Xiaofei Dao

Recently, China launched three consecutive strikes on the international stage.

The first blow is to promote the cooperation between the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States and the United States, the United States and the United States and the United States, and the United States and the United States and the United States.

The second blow was during the open working group meeting of the United Nations "Responsible Outreach Code", countered the US proposal.

The third blow was to vote against Russia in the resolution of Russia's resolution that Russia requested Russia to withdraw from the Ukraine nuclear power plant.

Whether it is to prevent nuclear diffusion, nuclear security, or preventing foreign space forces from preparing competitions, it is a major issue that is related to the fate of all human beings. They dare to say.

China has taken the initiative to attack on these issues today. The flags are clearly fighting with some Western powers, especially the United States, and the flags that have been in the hearts of developing countries and international communities for a long time. Resistance!

1

In September last year, the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia announced the establishment of the "three -sided security partnership" ("Oukus", Aukus). According to the agreement, the United States and Britain help Australia to build nuclear -powered submarines.

Australia is a nuclear -free country, and the two nuclear powers in the United States and Britain transfer the nuclear materials involved in military ships to a nuclear -free country. This has never happened in history. Not only the large number of outputs, in terms of concentrated uranium abundance, the United States and Britain directly exported more than 90 % of the weapon -level high -thick uranium to Australia, far exceeding its 3.67 % red line for Iran.

The international atomic energy agency is based on the "non -diffusion nuclear weapon treaty". The main function is to prevent nuclear diffusion and promote peaceful use of nuclear energy. The agency currently has 175 member states, and all behaviors need to be authorized by member states. Things like the United States and Britain and Australia nuclear submarines must seek authorization from the institution. Only a member of the sovereign state has the final decision.

From the beginning, China has questioned the United States, Britain, Australia, and Australia at the level of international atomic energy agencies, and promotes separate official issues that have been adopted by the settings and members of the member states. It involves the issue of nuclear weapons materials involved in the transfer of nuclear weapons materials to nuclear weapons countries to non -nuclear weapons countries.

It is conceivable that the United States and Britain and Australia must not be able to accept the supervision of the international community on this issue quickly. The game process is bound to be thrilling. According to Ambassador Wang Qun, the Representative of the United Nations and other international organizations in Vienna, China " Some countries attempt to hijack the Motor Council of the International Atomic Energy Institution. "

"Some countries", do not need to name who do you know who you say; "hijacking", that is, "kidnapping", "kidnapping" is not a dare to "tear the ticket"? How arrogant is this "some countries"?

Over the past year, this "some countries" mainly played with two methods: one is the power of the fire, and the other is the darkness.

Despite the questioning and opposition from other countries such as China, Indonesia, Malaysia, and other countries, the United States, Britain, and Australia have established the implementation of the 17 working group to promote the implementation of nuclear submarine agreements in one year. Scholars in the United Kingdom and Australia even clamored that China's obstruction will not hinder Okus' obstructions. Process, this is blatantly "horizontal."

The "Voice of the United States" publicly celebrated the first anniversary of "Oukus", and was afraid that the international community did not know. It made some "summary report" show off on the table.

One is to step up the trainer. In September this year, the Royal Navy submarine officers and soldiers began training on the fifth "machine -sensitive" attack nuclear and other "machine -sensitive" attack nuclear submarines in the latest service of the Royal Navy. This is the first time that the Australian Navy has been allowed to train in British submarines for the first time. "Voice of America" ​​said that more personnel will participate in training next year.

One is to step up intelligence and legal docking. In November last year, the Three Kingdoms signed the Naval Nuclear Power Information Exchange Agreement, which officially allowed Australia to obtain the US -British secret nuclear submarine information. In February this year, the agreement officially took effect.

One is to step up base construction. In March of this year, Australia announced that it will build a new submarine base on the east coast to stop the Australian nuclear submarine and support regular visit to the United States and British nuclear submarines.

In the past year, in addition to the establishment of the Oucus joint guidance team and 17 working groups, in order to promote Oukus's process, the three governments of the three countries have designated special personnel to guide Oukus.

There are so many actions on the bright side. What agreements have reached in private and how much they have reached in private. In order to block the mouth of the international community, the United States and Britain and Australia have begun to hide the sky on the international stage, especially the international atomic agencies.

Ambassador Wang Qun raised seven issues at the meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency Council, pointing directly at the behavior of the United States and Britain and Australia trying to conceal the sea.

First, the Three Kingdoms use the so -called "naval dynamic pile" as an excuse to avoid the illegal transfer of the cooperation of the Three Kingdoms involving the illegal transfer of nuclear weapons materials. The problem of "naval power stack" involved is essentially nuclear diffusion behavior.

Second, the three countries confuse military activities and nuclear diffusion within the scope of the sovereignty of a country. The cooperation between the Three Kingdoms nuclear submarine is not a simple problem of nuclear materials involved in the self -developed military ships of sovereign countries. Instead, it is the first time that the nuclear weapons are publicly transferred to the nuclear weapon materials directly from nuclear weapons countries to illegally transferred to tons of tons. The two cannot be confused. Third, the Three Kingdoms misleaded public opinion by the so -called "nuclear material sealing in reactors, and it was not directly used in nuclear weapons" and was completely unreasonable. In fact, the problem of cooperation between the Three Kingdoms nuclear submarine is prolonged, not how to deal with the related nuclear weapon materials. In view of the essence of its nuclear diffusion, the three countries cannot reduce the risk of nuclear security, nuclear security and nuclear diffusion.

The above three points are mainly public opinion wars on the international stage. But even if the public opinion battle, there are no skills and even a little sincere, it is completely entangled.

For example, the Three Kingdoms explained that Australia will not seek to have nuclear weapons or civil nuclear capabilities, which will prohibit uranium concentration. This means that the law stipulates that it cannot hold a gun. Check the procedures and implement additional guarantee measures to prevent the transfer of any nuclear materials. The problem is that the international atomic agency has not yet authorized the Three Kingdoms. The Three Kingdoms supervise itself?

Although the reasons are full of loopholes, the three countries have not sprinkled a good patient. After all, they have already said publicly, and obstruction can not hinder them.

Fourth, the Three Kingdoms, especially Australia, violate the application obligations stipulated by the institution to comprehensively guarantee the supervision agreement and the relevant statement. In the past year, Australia has officially announced that the cooperation between the Three Kingdoms has decided to make any substantial reports to the institutions so far, and it has violated its legal obligations to ensure supervision.

Fifth, the Three Kingdoms openly determine the relevant guarantee supervision plan directly with the institutional secretaries. The cooperation between the three countries' nuclear submarines creates a bad precedent for nuclear diffusion and exceeds the category of guaranteeing the supervision system. All member states of the institution must be discussed together. All member states of the institution must have the right to speak.

Sixth, the Three Kingdoms damage agencies' anti -diffusion functions and authority, and the abduction of the secretariat to engage in the activities prohibited by the "Statue". The Three Kingdoms attempts to coerce the Secretariat to propose a guarantee supervision plan for exemption from the cooperation of nuclear submarines in the Three Kingdoms, and then forcibly promote the passage of the council with its own voter advantages in the council, so as to legalize its illegal spread. Chinese support agencies strictly follow the provisions of Article 2 of the Period, and relevant budgets shall not be used to support activities that support military purposes.

Seventh, the Three Kingdoms always refused to report the substantial progress of the cooperation of nuclear submarines to the institution on the grounds of "unstented cooperation plan", so that the director and secretariat could not make a substantial report on the Three Kingdoms to the council, and it was impossible to effectively fulfill the agency " The report obligations stipulated in the Period.

The above four articles are very important. Ambassador Wang Qun disclosed that "some countries attempts to hijack the International Atomic Energy Agency Council".

According to Ambassador Wang Qun, the US, Britain, and Australia submitted the work documents of "Cooperation under Oukus Partnership" to the Tenth Review Conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and then distributed non -documents to institutional member states, covering up the issue of "Naval Power Pack" problem The essence of nuclear diffusion, packaging illegal nuclear diffusion as a legal and harmless behavior, misleading the international community.

Ambassador Wang Qun disclosed that the Three Kingdoms also engaged in political manipulation, trying to coerce the international atomic energy agency (hereinafter referred to as the "institution") of the Secretariat to propose a guarantee supervision plan, and then forcibly promoted the council through the advantages of "small circle" and its own votes. Let the nuclear diffusion act legally.

It is worth noting that before the council meeting was held on September 9, Raphael Grossi, the director of the International Atomic Energy Institution, submitted a written report to the institution's council for the first time on the cooperation between the United States and British and Australian nuclear submarines. The report said that the International Atomic Energy Agency "is satisfied with the technical consultation and exchanges with the Oukus from all parties so far, and is satisfied with their participation."

Regarding this report, Ambassador Wang Qun publicly called for the director of the International Atomic Energy Institutions for the fire and endorse the nuclear diffusion of the Three Kingdoms.

Wang Qun pointed out that the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency cannot be reduced to a political tool of the Three Kingdoms and made misleading conclusions. In the absence of legitimate legal basis and the authorization of member states, the Director -General handled the nuclear diffusion of the Nuclear Nuclear submarine cooperation in the United States and the United States and the United States, and even in the absence of relevant nuclear materials and nuclear activities in these three countries, it has made its nuclear submarine cooperation. Applicable a series of conclusions such as the "exceptions" of the "exceptions" of the supervision agreement. This is neither compliant nor legal, and it is absurd.

China has criticized the person in charge of the United Nations institution. This is very rare. It is also necessary to have such a appeal at the same time.

Wang Qun introduced that at the council meeting, the general officer has maintained neutrality and fairness in procedure, and did not ask the topic of the United States and the United States, Britain, and Australia. This is the effect of the international community, including China.

The reaction to the Director -General rushed directly to the front desk, proposed its own issues, and deliberately avoided the nature of illegal transfer of nuclear weapons materials in the Three Kingdoms.

According to Wang Qun, there is a small episode here: After the United States suddenly proposed to set up a new issue, the Chinese side proposed to the chairman of the conference that the United States did not provide complete materials in accordance with the rules of the discussion, and it was recommended to take a 15 -minute rest in order to give the United States a chance to correct errors and improve improvement in a timely manner. issue. China has not directly grasped the topic flaws to fight against the United States, which reflects the Chinese atmosphere and confidence.

Wang Qun introduced that after the United States made up the material materials, the Chinese side immediately became clear and did not participate in the consultation of the issue, which effectively frustrated the plot of the "whitewashing" nuclear proliferation of the United States and Britain. At the council, the majority of member states expressed serious concerns about the seven issues of the cooperation between the Three Kingdoms. The power of justice has achieved a staged victory, and the next game will not be easy, but the international community unite to resist the overbearing Western confidence is growing.

2

At the same time as the meeting of the International Atomic Energy Institution Council, the opening working group meeting of the United Nations' "Responsible Outreach Conduct" is also held in the Palace of Geneva.

During the meeting, the United States representatives proposed a motion: the United States had taken the lead in promising no longer conducting a destructive helicopter anti -satellite missile test, calling on other countries to follow up, and stated that the United States intends to submit the draft resolutions to the first Committee of the 77th UN General Assembly.

The United States is the country with the earliest anti -satellite test time, the largest number of times, and the most complete types. Now that it is not discovered by conscience? Is this a good thing?

The American lies were revealed by the Chinese disarmament ambassador Li Song. Li Song pointed out that the U.S.'s initiative has not constituted any restrictions and restraints on the development of the United States and air forces, and has no actual value to promote the international air force control process.

Li Song pointed out that two years after the launch of the first artificial earth satellite in 1959, the United States began to conduct helicopter anti -satellite weapon tests. The anti -satellite weapon trials in the United States in history not only severely damaged the external environment and the external air system, but also directly promoted the confrontation and arms competition of large powers. After more than half a century of development, the anti -satellite methods of the United States have been very complete, and they can use anti -missile equipment to form practical anti -satellite capabilities. It has no longer needed destructive helicopter anti -guard missile tests.

Li Song said that the United States is the country that is most enthusiastic about developing space offensive and defensive combat capabilities, and now submitting this draft resolution is quite ironic. If the United States is really committed to maintaining external air safety, the draft resolution should be proposed as early as 60 years ago. The draft of the US resolution involves only experiments, and does not mention the research and development, production, deployment or use of anti -satellite weapons, which fully indicates that the U.S. initiative is one -sided, and it will not constitute itself. Military control is also very limited. China welcomes all military control initiatives that are truly conducive to achieving the target of foreign air forces, but resolutely oppose any practice of expanding unilateral military advantages in the name of fake military control.

Ambassador Li Song's explanation is very clear and clear. Even people who do not understand the international air force control process can immediately understand that the United States is re -applied. For a long time, the United States has used its advantages in military and technology to gain advantages in a field, and then promote the establishment of "rules" to block the roads that other countries follow -up.

Li Song pointed out that "Yang Tang stopped boiling, and it was like a salary at the bottom of the kettle." From a historical and practical perspective, the root cause of the risk of air arms and arms competitions lies in the United States attempting to dominate the air. Although the Cold War has ended for 30 years, the United States has not stopped the thinking of the Cold War thinking and unilaterally obtaining the advantages of external air strategy, and the related plans and actions of external air operations have continued to increase.

According to Li Song, from the new version of the space policy documents recently released by the United States, the document blatantly regards space as "national military power priority field". Empty, fought from the outside, and air outward. " Such an air security policy measure is the continuation of the long -term "dominant air" strategy that the United States has pursued, and it is also the most prominent factor in the risk of foreign air weapons and arms competitions. Essence

I have to say that the Chinese side's statement is really beautiful, and it is for the United States who want to secretly Chen Cang.

3

The International Atomic Energy Agency has recently passed a resolution demanding that Russia ended the occupation of the Ukraine Zapolo Nuclear Power Station.

Russia and China have received opposition votes against resolutions. Burundi, India, Pakistan, Vietnam, Egypt, Senegal, and South Africa voted for abandoned votes.

Zapolo Nuclear Power Station is the largest nuclear power plant in Europe. In March this year, the nuclear power plant was controlled by the Russian army, and then the Russian National Atomic Energy Company was taken over, but it was still operated by the employees of the Ukrainian National Nuclear Power Company. Since then, Enenelgardar and suburbs near the Zaparo Nuclear Power Station, and even nuclear power plants have been attacked by artillery shells and drones. Russia and Ukraine have launched the word of each of the attacks.

China has always been highly concerned about the Crims of Zapolo Nuclear Power Station and has expressed concerns many times. China has repeatedly called on the lives of countless people and the well -being of generations, we cannot be lucky, let alone do nothing, we must do our best to maximize the occurrence of accidents.

China has repeatedly called for the international community to step up diplomatic efforts, promote the party's early restart to restart the negotiations, realize the ceasefire and stop war as soon as possible, and eliminate the risk of nuclear safety from the root cause.

We see that in this issue, China's attitude is very clear. Nuclear safety issues must not be eager to look at it, it cannot be politicized, cannot be pulled, and cannot exacerbate the situation of Ukraine. The high -safety risk nuclear power plant should be "cold", and the Russian -Ukraine conflict must also be "cold", so as to avoid greater tragedy.

If you look up this three -link, the thinking behind it is not easy.

The West has not been engaged in the international stage since the past two days, but this kind of manipulation has been disclosed through the memoirs of diplomats or reports from Western media in the past.Needless to say.Nowadays, we are increasingly disclosed the details of the game on the international stage, and timely help the international community to fully understand the truth about the international community game around these major issues. It is the embodiment of our initiative to act as the increasingly skilled at the same time.

Pictures from the network

Source: Make up one knife

- END -