Chen Bing: Biden managed to prevent China's development, but there was no "thief boat" on the country

Direct News: After the United States implemented advanced chip manufacturing equipment restrictions on China, it also decided to reduce its dependence on Chinese medicine and chemicals. Does this mean that the United States regards economic and technology as weapons and systematically restrict China?

Special commentator Chen Bing: This trend is relatively obvious. The United States is regarding economic and technology as a weapon. With national security as an excuse to limit China's economic development and technological progress, focusing on suppressing China's technical industries that may surpass the United States. The United States is banned from exporting to China less than 14 nanometer semiconductor equipment, which aims to suppress China's chip manufacturing industry, and chips are "oil in the digital era", providing motivation for all electronic industries such as computers, telephone, artificial intelligence, automotive, and electrical appliances. Controlling advanced chip manufacturing is equivalent to stuck your neck, and many emerging industries are difficult to sprint at the forefront.

In addition to setting up restrictions on China's advanced chip manufacturing equipment, the United States also sets up roadblocks on the exit of chip. The so -called "chip Quartet Alliance" is organized to restrict the supply of the Chinese market, thereby restricting the development of China's advanced manufacturing industry. Subsequently, US President Biden signed an administrative order to strengthen the development of the domestic biotechnology industry in the United States, thereby reducing dependence on Chinese new drugs, chemicals and other products.

The United States has the world's most powerful biotechnology industry, but some high -tech production is transferred abroad, and China has advanced biological manufacturing infrastructure. Therefore , And then suppressing China's biotechnology industry. It is foreseeable that the United States will also introduce restrictions to restrict biotechnology and raw materials exports to China.

The United States has always worried that China's economic aggregate will surpass the United States one day in the future, so try to prevent China's economic development and delay China's super beautiful pace by setting up cards in key technical fields. In recent years, the United States has restricted technology exports to the Chinese economy and key industries in the name of national security. 40 years ago, it has also implemented a variety of tools such as politics, law, tariffs, investment, etc. 40 years ago. In seven years, Japan's leading semiconductor industry tripped, and never turned over again. Therefore, China needs precise response and focus on breakthroughs.

We particularly need to be alertly alert that the United States' economic restriction on China is from the comprehensive offense of the Trump administration, that is, the import tariff on imports of Chinese goods, and shifting to the key blow of the Biden government, that is, key technologies Covering with emerging industries, in every basic technology field, from artificial intelligence, to quantum science, a new generation of mobile networks, etc., to set up cards in China to prevent China from gaining stronger technical advantages than the United States. And the competition between China and the United States and industries, unlike the marathon -like diligence in the past, is a 100 -meter sprint sprint, which is extremely fast.

The measures taken by the United States are not market economy. It is more to play black, such as export restrictions, issuing laws to set up roadblocks, pulling security in and entangled. The basic attitude of the United States is that there is still a gap between China and the United States to quickly respond to curb China, can it wait until China obtains a comprehensive technical advantage and influence. Next, the United States may also negotiate with allies in Europe and Asia to adopt consistent technology and industrial policies to set up limits for China.

On September 8th local time, the Indo -Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) that the United States wanted to build a two -day ministerial meeting was held in Los Angeles. According to a statement issued after the meeting, India is the only one of the only IPEF four pillars. Member of trade negotiations.

Straight News: The "Indo -Pacific Economic Framework" thrown in the United States seems to be a strategy of dischargeing China. Can the United States pull up the group? Why does India withdraw from the trade field?

Special commentator Chen Bing: Yes, the "Indo -Pacific Economic Framework" in the United States is one of the economic strategies that exclude China and restrict China, trying to let Asian countries choose a side station between China and the United States. However, the "Indo -Pacific Economic Framework" is not a binding economic and trade agreement. It may also be promoted to the economic and trade agreement in the future, or it may die halfway. Essence Because the United States always takes care of its own interests and does not care about the reality of other countries, there is also the Indian withdrawal of trade negotiations, because India cannot measure what benefits will bring themselves.

The "Indo -Pacific Economic Framework" has four pillars, including trade, supply chain, clean economy, and anti -corruption, all of which are established according to the requirements of the United States, but excluding the US market access. In other words, it is necessary to act in accordance with the rules of the United States, but the United States does not give any benefits. Therefore, in the Minister -level talks held in Los Angeles, India first retreated and said that it was a thoughtful and logical decision. This also shows that countries with different levels of development in the United States are not only unrealistic, but even a bit of bullying the taste of the city.

The exit of India also seemed to indicate that the "Indo -Pacific Economic Framework" was likely to become a rotten project. After the first round of ministerial talks held in Los Angeles, US Secretary of Commerce Raymond Dorods admitted that the member states failed to reach consensus when the four pillar negotiations were completed. It can be seen that there are major differences in the issues such as market access, tariff reduction and trade liberalization of the United States and other member states. The negotiations have started, but not much progress, which means that other countries do not want to board the American thief boat.

Author 丨 Chen Bing, special commentator of Shenzhen Satellite TV "Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan"

- END -