Big Bang occurred at the Russian Airport!8 fighters were destroyed, did the Ukraine "Hamas" do it?

[Military Bills Plane] Author: Lele

Recently, the large -scale military exercises in China have attracted great attention from the Chinese people and made the Russian and Ukraine war that originally attracted a lot of attention. It has been a domestic public opinion center that has not appeared in the country for a while. However, a big explosion occurred at the Russian airport on the afternoon of August 9. Due to its rare explosion intensity, the response of both Russia and Ukraine after the explosion and the high losses of the Russian army made the situation very confusing, thus gained a lot focus on. In fact, if you look for the truth of the whole thing from a series of news that have been released, the end result is actually a very interesting existence. For the Russian army, sometimes the problem is not just the battlefield.

▲ Screenshot of Reported Reports of Russia

First, to sort out the roughly through the entire incident. At about 15:20 pm on the 9th, the Russian army's New Fedrovka Airport at the Crimean Peninsula suddenly exploded, and the huge sound even shattered a large amount of glass around. As the huge fire that rose rose was about to disappear, the second explosion occurred, and its intensity was almost different from the first time. After the explosion, the Russian Ministry of Defense issued a statement saying that "the explosion has not caused injuries and airport air equipment is not damaged." Later, the United States "New York Times" wrote that it received private news from a senior Ukraine officer, which caused the Ukraine to lead to the explosion and "using a device specifically made by Ukraine." On the 10th, Russian media reported that 10 people in Russia were injured due to explosives, and 1 of them died. By the afternoon of the same day, the total number of casualties increased to 14. In addition, senior Ukraine officials officially announced on the 10th that the explosion of the Russian airport was not done in Ukraine.

▲ After the first explosion, the fire rose to the sky

Although there are some contradictory descriptions of the explosion, there are some contradictory places, from this series of reports, they can still generally see the explosion and the context of subsequent derived events. At present, there are two main problems that the outside world cares about, namely the real cause of the explosion and the actual loss of the Russian army. Regarding the first problem, the outside world mainly considered the attack of the Ukraine, but then the denial from Ukraine made the problem changing interesting. Among the current remote weapons equipped by the Ukraine, the US-made M-142 "Haimas" rocket launcher, the "dot -U" short-range ballistic missile, the US "fish fork" anti-ship missile, and the "Neptune" anti-ship missile. It is an external guess weapon.

▲ US-made M-142 "Haimas" rocket launcher recently attracted much attention

Among them, the 16 M-142 provided by the Ukraine that has been received, and the British track-type M-270 rocket launcher, have always used the 227mm rocket with a range of about 70 kilometers as the main weapon. New Fedrovka Airport, about 200 kilometers. However, both M-142 and M-270 can actually be equipped, with a range of 610 mm rockets with a range of about 300 kilometers. Therefore, some opinions believe that it may be the US secretly provided a supporting 610 mm rocket to the Ukraine, and then Wuwu was Wuwu. The army completed this round of blows, but only by the previous statement of the United States, the Ukraine needs to keep confidential before denying it. There is no problem in this view, but only two explosions occurred at the Russian airport at the time (and the second time the ammunition of the flame spread), it is difficult to believe that only one rocket can be spanned 200,000 in 200,000. After the distance of rice, complete such a precise blow.

▲ More tracked M-270 rocket launchers

As for the famous "dot -U" short-range ballistic missile, its range can meet the needs, but the problem is that this Soviet weapon designed in the 1980s has always been very limited. Qi shot to achieve the purpose, it is difficult to imagine that one has this effect. The US -assisted "fish fork" anti -ship missile is actually no problem to attack land targets, but it is difficult to exceed 200 kilometers in this case. In contrast, Ukraine's self -produced "Neptune" anti -ship missile is the only equipment that meets the range and accuracy requirements, and it is also in line with an unofficial description of "using a device specially made by Ukraine". However, the meteorological conditions around the explosion area were good on the day.

▲ "Neptune" is considered a weapon that may cause this explosion

Therefore, comprehensively, the Russian army claims that "the explosion is caused by the explosion of several aviation bombs." reason. Although the Ukraine's description of whether to participate in the explosion is contradictory, the possibility of hiding for some reason after attacking the airport is really not much. Incidentally, because the Ukraine used to use drones before, it remotely attacked the Russian Navy's Black Sea Fleet Command and caused some damage. Therefore, some views also believe that the Ukraine may be repeated. But at present, this possibility is almost no, the reason is simple, the explosive intensity of the drone carrying explosives cannot be compared with the situation at all.

▲ The Russian Su-24 combat bomber, which has been completely damaged

According to normal logic, since the Russian army itself is the most likely to cause explosion, then it should be expanded to avoid re -incidence of similar things. After all, from the pictures on social media, the Russian army has confirmed that the explosion has lost 1 Su-30sm and 2 Su-24M. And if the satellite picture published in the New York Times, the explosion area actually parked 3 Su-30sm and 5 Su-24M. However, for the Russian army, even if the eight fighters were lost all the most unsatisfactory circumstances, it was not an unbearable price. After all, the equipment and reserves of its fighter jets were very considerable. It is impossible to completely change the leading advantages of the Russian Air Force and HNA. ▲ Su-30SM fighter equipped by HNA

However, the performance of the Russian army in another battlefield -public opinion battle was very bad. In the initial report of the Russian Ministry of Defense, I do n’t know what for the reason. The word “the explosion has not caused injuries and the airport’ s aviation equipment is not damaged ”. This is far more disastrous than losing 8 fighters. describe. After the news of 13 Russian people injured and multiple fighter planes were disclosed, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported the incident in this matter actually lost the most important nature of the official media -authority, this is invisible, this is invisible The credibility of losses was the worst loss of Russia after the explosion.

▲ The explosion and what happened later had a great impact on local residents

In fact, after such an accident, it is impossible to confirm the loss of personnel and equipment immediately, and it is normal to find the cause of the accident. It's very different. In fact, on the night of the explosion, a large number of local residents escaped so much that the traffic was blocked, which was the most direct proof of this. The Russian side has begun for more than 5 months. After entering the stalemate consumption stage, it still makes such a heavyweight mistake, and it really needs to be really valued.

- END -