Good reader wisdom

█ "Reading to Teacher" series ①

In the summer of this year, I participated in the "Reading Club for Teachers" organized by the China Education News, and read a book online with teachers who love reading for 21 days. I have organized some reading clubs, but they are all offline, and I have no experience in the online reading club. Let me read a book with a group of strange friends in the South China Sea, which is indeed a bit challenging.

"book club"

Only read it to "know"

I have always thought that reading is a personal business. Since it is a personal business, it is not so important to check in without checking in. No. In fact, there are many friends who have basically not played cards in our reading community.

Nevertheless, I still pay much attention to the content of the teachers' check -in. When I have time every day, I go to see the text of their check -in, and I will make some responses in a targeted manner. I am more concerned about the reading community of nearly 500 people. From time to time, throw some questions in the group, and I will also respond to the questions of book friends. Some of the daily check -in tasks I designed are mostly from the feedback from book friends, and it is not simply presenting a few tasks. I will write thousands of words in the form of punch cards every day. video.

I am not suitable for "leading readers". My positioning is a "catfish". My role is to stir a pond of spring water. In order to better stir, I pulled a few familiar friends who were familiar with, not for punching, and stirred them together. I also paid great attention to active book friends in the community. Please ask them as guests of online salons and share with book friends to share with the book friends to share with the book friends to share with the book friends Their cognition and understanding, including the confusion encountered in reading. As a "catfish", you must not only read the "transparent" of the books you read, but also clarify the reading goals of a book or even reading. The goal of this reading club is to let the common readers form a consciousness of "monetization", use reflection and improve their teaching cognition and teaching behavior. The strategy adopts "overall perception" to grasp the "big concept", understand the main point of view, focus on preparation and feedback, and strive to achieve the practice from "text" to practice, then practice to "text", that is, the practice under theoretical guidance, the practice under theoretical guidance, the practice, that is, the practice under the theoretical guidance, the practice, that is, the practice under the theoretical guidance. Practice to the theoretical improvement. Therefore, I have designed a lot of views in the "Visible Learning -Promoting Learning (Teacher Version) to the greatest extent", reflect on the tasks of preparing lessons and teaching behaviors, so that common readers realize that only teaching design under theoretical guidance under theoretical guidance under theoretical guidance Only with teaching can achieve the integration of science and art.

A book friend said that these 21 days of "catfish" reading is very brain -burning, so that they not only recognize the lack of reading, but also the lack of teaching. Read, then know the shortcomings; teach, and then know the sleepy, yes! It should be said that I am a beneficiary of the 21 -day reading journey. Not only because I wrote more than 30,000 words in these 21 days, but because I also met a lot of distant friends who love to read and think well in these 21 days. After 21 days, they pulled another reading group, hoping to have the opportunity to continue reading together. Although I spend almost 6 hours on it every day, it is worth it.

Read a few books

"Top Sky" book

Today, the new curriculum schemes and various subjects of basic education have proposed "comprehensive learning", "cross -disciplinary comprehensive learning", "project learning", "'teaching evaluation' consistency" and other requirements. What are the theoretical supports behind them? How to implement it? We didn't know in the past, so through reading, we figured out the potential knowledge behind these requirements.

In this era of printed products, there are really too many books, isn't it that "what to read is more important than how to read"? My understanding is that what I read must affect what I "know". As far as my many years of reading experience, I advocate teachers based on my professional development, to choose those books that are "echoed". The so -called "sky" mentioned here refers to books that explain the principles of education and teaching from philosophy, psychology, and brain neurology, such as "The purpose of education", "democracy and education", "Education Philosophy", "How people learn "Development Psychology", "21st Century Skills", "Innovation and Innovation of Learning and Innovation", "What is worth teaching? Retevant of the Course in the Technical Age "" On Dialogue ", etc.; the so -called" land "refers to the classics of how to solve the specific issues of education and teaching (how to prepare lessons, how to do teaching, and how to do classroom management) from the technical level. "Conditions of Learning", "Principles of Teaching Design", "Teaching Model", "Visible Learning", "Science of Learning", "Teaching Design of Pursuing Understanding", "Classroom Design of the Class to See" and so on. It is recommended that young teachers do not read things that are "unable to go up and down". Those things are like carbonated drinks, which are refreshing, but there is no nutrition, and it will cause disease.

Social science research theory tells us that changes in conceptual changes to change, and changes in behavior in turn will further promote conceptual changes. "Dingtian" books can help teachers change their concepts, and "standing" books can promote teachers to change their behavior. Without reading the books related to the principles of education and education, educational actions will inevitably touch the river to cross the river, without reading books that solve the technical problems of operating technical problems, educational actions are inevitably rude and brutal. If you can look at it from the big place, start from a young age, maybe many problems can be solved, and some goals can be achieved. A little

The consciousness of "Reading"

Daniel Levitin's "Thinking of the Truth at a Breaks" has a concept "Anti -Knowledge", which was created by British journalist Damian Thompson. He used the term "anti -knowledge". Similar error information. In my opinion, the various Internet celebrities seemed to make a lot of reason today, and the "wonderful" words that sound like a spirit of heart belong to this category. Even if the educational thoughts of education like Dewey, in Jasberg, "school education in the United States has been messy by the basic principles of Dewey's harm. Children have been arguing for them too little. The preparation education is too bad. But the most terrible thing is that, just like in Germany, it is not enough basic education, but in terms of technology and industry, there is no enough, high -quality successor. " As a reader, you must read with a consciousness of critical, connect with specific education and teaching issues, transform the readings into your own education understanding, and consciously improve your education and teaching behavior on this basis.

When I saw the new curriculum standard mentioned the learning tasks under "real situations", I thought, is it unreal when we used to give students the learning tasks for students in the past? It is always puzzled, but when I see the "SOLO Classification Theory (Observe Learning Achievement Structure)" when I see the "SOLO Classification Theory (Observative Learning Achievement Structure)", it suddenly enlightened: "The scene of learning includes a series of activities, such as reading and listening to class , Discuss, take notes, participate in field surveys, watch demonstrations, consult maps, write, and so on. There are also judgment such as using the knowledge and skills I have learned, eliminating contradictions, explaining poetry or describing maps, making decisions or solving problems, and decisions or solving problems. Wait. There are many ways to apply knowledge or skills to solve problems, but each method needs to use a series of knowledge components (facts or concepts, procedures or skills). "It really does not need to be entangled for the new concept and new requirements. The laws of education are always relatively stable. Mobilize personal knowledge and examine it from another angle. But the premise is that you have to read some related books. It does n’t matter if you do n’t read it. You can read it immediately and “monetize” in reading.

Herr Graggson said: "Readers who have calmed their hearts and read carefully are expected to gain something, and because reading materials do not need to respond immediately. When readers encounter challenging ideas, there will be no urgency to respond on the spot on the spot. Feeling, they can spend more time thinking. If anyone is angry with their content, they will also have time to digest. If anyone feels doubtful, they can read or consider other information. Watch documentaries, online conversations or live lectures. Similar advantages, but the time to invest in and concentration of reading may enhance people's understanding and recognition of the content of the book. Perhaps this is not a obvious way to solve the new problem, but it does make people perform efficiently. "I think that reading needs to be focused, associated and criticized, and the gains of reading are more obtained in the test of self -examination and criticism, in the test of education and teaching practice. , I don't even care about the overlap or even accusations.

What I want to say is that if you want to "monetize", you must have the spirit of "啃". The next thing to "啃" may be "啃" next; if you want to "go", you must expand reading related potential knowledge Book. Therefore, we must face ignorance and seek to know in reading.

Read, give up prejudice

Read, form "prejudice"

In my personal cognition, once the way of thinking is solidified, prejudice often follows. Any person's understanding of teaching is often gradual, and it should even be discarded. Otherwise, his own vision will inevitably lead to prejudice. Regarding prejudice, I am more interested in Peter Felix Geri Vacci: "The so -called prejudice refers to the thoughts that bring specific deviations to thinking and judgment. Turn. "Peter Felix Geri Vacci believes:" Both prejudice creates a paradigm, and the paradigm generates prejudice. "Only when people are attached to a certain job, they may think and explore in a certain aspect, and and explore, and explore, and explore, and explore, and explore, and explore, and explore, and explore it, and explore it. On this basis, a little eyebrows. However, it must be clearly realized that once it is because of the old, it may be out of place, and the teaching understanding is impossible. "The pattern is changing every day, and I don't know what the correct answer is. If you find that your actions are biased towards a certain model, you can understand how to act. Is it to face others and problems or a little distance? Among these options? Select the correct approach. Especially when the "changes are fierce", their respective intentions and ideas are diverse, so it is necessary to convey their own thinking more carefully. " There is a sharp change. In short, it is the change of way of thinking. "I feel that the" model "here seems to be the same as" paradigm ". I can’t read the original work. I don’t know if it is a translation. understand. We often talk about the thinking mode. My understanding of the "thinking mode" is also the way of thinking. In this way, can it be understood that the "mode" that is said here is not the same as the "teaching mode" that experts say "teaching mode". My understanding of experts (more about "famous schools") launched the "teaching mode" is not the meaning of Joyce and Thomas. At best, it is just one of Joyce's four models - - Information processing model. To say a little bit, it is the "routine", the routine of solidification.

In the early years, Hegel proposed the concept of "abandonment": "For some kind of thing and concept, even if it has been denied, don't completely abandon the individual elements that constitute it, but save it. In other words, discarding is a way of thinking. When negating the past world and different worldviews, new paradigm changes, do not completely abandon the paradigm that has been denied. Among the new paradigms. "So you can understand that all research is dynamic, not static, and all" new theories "," new method ", and" new model "are slowly constructed on the basis of critical inheritance , And slowly abandoned.

Joan Winke's "Critical Education" has a basic point of view. What you say now is out of date. What we are talking about now is out of date, is there a fixed teaching mode? Through reading, give up prejudice; through reading, "prejudice", maybe our teaching wisdom can be released.

(Author: Ling Zongwei is Jiangsu Province Middle School Chinese Special Teacher)

- END -