Analysis of the current status of domestic interpretation research based on literature measurement

Summary: Based on the Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences Citation Database (CHSSACD) developed by the Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CHSSACD), by constructing important keywords in the field of interpretation, we use the literature measurement method to explain the field of interpretation in 1981-2021 The literature studies mainly, mainly to measure the number of thesis, disciplinary distribution, the author and institutions and cooperation, and the commonwords of keywords in this field. The research direction that scholars are more concerned about. Studies have shown that after more than 40 years of development, domestic interpretation studies have entered a stage of steady development, and they are gradually forming several major research areas such as western interpretation theoretical research, interpretation theory, and building Chinese interpretation. Continuous development, contemporary China interpretation theory is gradually improving.

Keywords: interpretation of literature literature measurement knowledge map visual analysis

The author Hao Ruoyang, an associate researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Science Evaluation of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; Luan Lan, assistant researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Science Evaluation Research. (Beijing 100732)

Source: "Chinese Social Science Evaluation" 2022, No. 2 P147 -P156

Editor in charge: Ma Tao

Explaining, German is Hermeneutik, and English is Hermeneutics, which originated from the comments of linguistics and the Bible. In the 18th century, Schryle Malch refined from the specific interpretation practice to use the interpretation method for general text, including semantic interpretation and psychological interpretation. Delai further elaborated Schryle Mach's thoughts and believed that interpretation is a psychiatric methodology that is different from natural science methodology. Heidegger has shifted the interpretation from methodology to the body theory, proposing that understanding is the essence of human beings, a historic behavior, and there is no objective interpretation beyond history. Gadamer inherited Heidegger's ontology thoughts, proposed the three major explanations of historic, vision integration, and historical interpretation of understanding. Science -based unified science. In addition, the general methodological interpretation of Italian philosopher Betty, the criticism interpretation of German philosopher Habermas, the text interpretation of French philosopher Paul Lico, and the objective interpretation of the American interpretation of He Shi It has attracted the attention and research of the academic community. Various thoughts complement each other and jointly promote the interpretation of academic ideas in the world. Pan Derong combines the history of the development of western interpretation, and will interpret the understanding and interpretation of the understanding and interpretation of the text theory of the text of the text and its theory of its own body theory in the book "History of Western Interpretation." In fact, there is also a tradition of understanding and interpretation of text in China. The most representative of which is the interpretation of classics and the diversification of classic interpretations that have created the academic trend of Chinese era. In the 1980s, the western interpretation of philosophy was introduced into China with philosophy as a carrier. The value of interpretation was recognized by scholars in various fields in China. The field of philosophy was mostly named interpretation and interpretation. Explanation. The method of interpretation can help the interpreter better understand the world under different history and culture, and explore the implicit ideas in the text. Li Qingliang and Zhang Hongzhi listed the excellent academic achievements of Western interpretation, research and application of Western interpretation, research and application of Western interpretation, the research and application of Western interpretation, the research of Chinese classic interpretation, and the construction of Chinese interpretation in China It has played a role in sorting out the context of interpretation of academic development and promoting China's interpretation of academic development. At present, domestic interpretation studies have gradually shifted from early translation introduction to theoretical research and theoretical use. Some scholars have also begun to explore the construction of an interpretation theoretical system that meets the needs of the development of Chinese disciplines, and interpretation has entered a stage of stable development in China.

This article will start from the perspective of the construction of the disciplinary system, and use the analysis methods and tools of literature measurement to conduct the amount of publishing the paper, the disciplines involved, the author and the publishing agency, and the keywords of the publishing of the paper in the field of interpretation. In summary of the research status and research hotspots of domestic interpretations, and revealing the development trend of domestic interpretation research from a macro level.

1. Research tool and data source description

This article is based on the sources of the literature of the Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences Citation Database (CHSSACD), comprehensively using the visual scientific literature analysis software developed by Dr. Chen Chaomei University of Direzer University in the United States, and the literature visualization software VosViewer developed by the Literature Research Center developed by the Laton University of the Netherlands. Merit and analyze Chinese literature in the field of domestic interpretation.

Through preliminary literature research and multiple trial retrieval, determine the search keywords as interpretation, interpretation, interpretation, interpretation, philosophical interpretation, western interpretation, classic interpretation, classical interpretation, Chinese interpretation, romantic interpretation Learning, contemporary interpretation, interpretation history, logic, interpretation mode, interpretation mode, interpretation boundary, interpretation, mandatory interpretation, excessive interpretation, public interpretation, social interpretation, interpreter, literary interpretation Dilai, Betty, Paul Lico, interpretation cycle, interpretation of learning cycle, interpretation, interpretation method, Stanner, interpretation of translation theory, Hermeneutics, all fields and full -time retrieval (time as of the end of October 2021 at the end of October 2021 ) Research literature in related fields in China, a total of 6216 documents were retrieved. After artificial screening and heavy weight, 301 unrelated documents were eliminated, and 5915 documents were finally obtained as statistical data sources. The literature time was distributed from 1981 to 2021. Based on these documents, this article mainly uses VOSViewer to complete the author and institutional component and keywords to present statistical analysis, use CiteSpace to complete keywords to highlight analysis, and generate visualized graphs to explore the core research force distribution of domestic interpretation, research hotspots and trends Essence 2. Explain the posts of the field of studies

(1) The overall trend of the thesis publication

The number of papers published in the field of interpretation can reflect the changes in the research status and trend of the field. From 1981 to 2021, there were 5,915 papers in the field of interpretation. Among them, there were 2624 papers published in the core and above level. Figure 1 shows the age distribution of papers in the field of interpretation in 1981 to 2021. From the perspective of the number of papers, all thesis and core journal papers in the field of interpretation (including the core and above levels of journal papers) are basically the same, which can be divided into three stages: (1) the budding stage (introducing the start -up stage): from the stage) On the curve, the amount of documents was issued year by year from 1981 to 1997, and the annual number of issues has been less than 50. In 17 years, a total of 380 papers were published; From 40 articles, it has increased year by year. By 2007, the first peak value of 309 articles; (3) Stable development stage: 2008-2021, the volume of posts presenting a fluctuation trend, respectively in 2015, 2018, and 2020, three times, respectively three times in 2015, 2018, and 2020 respectively. The peak, of which the number of issues in 2015 was the highest, 346. Due to the data collection of this article as of October 2021, the data in 2021 is incomplete.

(2) Discipline distribution

The introduction of China in the 1980s has attracted the attention and research of more and more scholars. In order to more clearly distinguish between interpretation and interpretation of the relationship between science and humanities and social sciences, this article adopts the discipline classification standards in the "Chinese Humanities and Social Science Journal AMI Evaluation Report (2018)" published by the Chinese Social Science Evaluation Research Institute. The 1,424 journals that published the dissertation in the field of interpretation are based on their subjects. It is found that with the continuous deepening of domestic scholars on interpretation research, the impact of interpretation of the academic on humanities and social sciences has become more and more significant. Domestic interpretation studies first appeared in Marxist philosophy research in 1981, and then affected a few disciplines such as literature, sociology, art, education, linguistics, and linguistics. Generally speaking The impact of other disciplines is relatively limited. However, the influence of interpretation of learning on domestic humanities and social sciences has continued to expand in the following decades, and the theoretical and methods of interpretation have gradually been applied to political science, law, journalism and communication, economics, management, history, ethnic science, and ethnicology,, ethnicology, ethnicology, and ethnicology, 19 disciplines such as culture, library, intelligence and archives are currently in the stage of stable development. Its application scope not only covers all areas of humanities and social sciences, but also affects some areas in natural sciences. These areas Including medical, information science, agricultural science and biological science. From the perspective of the number of discipline papers, the number of interpretations published in comprehensive journals is the largest number, exceeding one -half of the total number of thesis, followed by the four disciplines of literature, education, art, and philosophy. The number of papers is more than 200 articles, accounting for about a quarter of the total number of issues. From the comprehensive analysis of the number of discipline papers, the number of disciplines and the number of disciplines, and the disciplinary quantity, it can be seen that interpretation has a great influence on philosophy, education, literature, law, art, and linguistics.

(3) The post of posting agency and the author of the post

From the perspective of the document agency, the proportion of interpreters published by Shandong University during 1981-2021 accounted for 2.72%of the total number of thesis in the field, and the number of documents in domestic scientific research institutions accounted for the highest proportion. The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2.62%), Anhui Normal University (2.37%), Fudan University (2.30%), East China Normal University (2.28%) and other institutional scholars have relatively high volume. Judging from the proportion of institutions, Central South University accounted for 4.78%of the total quantity of the lead, ranking first. In 2003, the article of "Translator's Subjectism: Interpretation of the Interpretation" of Zhongnan University Tu Guoyuan and Zhu Xianlong was reached 1400 times, which contributed the most to the agency. The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (accounting for 4.60%) and Anhui Normal University (accounting for 4.11%). From the perspective of institutional cooperation, the author's cooperation phenomenon in this field is relatively small. The proportion of the total papers is 19%, and the cross -institutional cooperation rate is lower, only 9%. In the country, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Renmin University of China, Fudan University, Shandong University, East China Normal University, Beijing Normal University, Wuhan University and other institutional cooperation networks, these institutions have strong academic cohesion in the field of interpretation. Judging from the author's post, if the threshold of the author entered the author's team in the field of the field is published in a certain field, then the number of research teams that explain the three development stages of the study are: 19 people in the buds, 58 people in the growth stage, stable development in stable development, and stable development. 200 people in the stage. It can be seen that after 40 years of hard work, domestic interpretation studies are now in a stable development stage. The research team has begun to take shape and formed a core author group. Among them, the author of the top 5 of them is: Professor Zhang Jiang of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (31 posts, 797 times), Professor He Weiping of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (27 posts, 274 times), Anhui University Zhang Nengwei as a professor for a professor. (Posted 23 articles, were quoted 97 times), Professor Li Chunqing of South China Normal University (published 23 articles, was cited 90 times), Researcher Hong Handing (18 posts, 357 times) and Anhui Normal University Peng Qifu ( Published 18 articles and were quoted 163 times).

In order to better understand the cooperation in the field of interpretation, this article uses VosViewer to draw an interpretation of the author's cooperation online map, as shown in Figure 2. The node in the figure represents the author, the size of the node represents the amount of the author, the larger the node represents the more the author's post, the dark node group represents the close cooperation of the author, and the light -colored node represents the independent author. It can be seen from Figure 2 that the authors in the field of interpretation are relatively small. Most of the authors are studying independently, but it can also be found that with Professor Zhang Jiang of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Researcher Hong Hanting, Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, and Professor Li Qingliang Hunan University The author's cooperation network with Professor Peng Qifu, Anhui Normal University is more obvious. Among them, the author's cooperation network formed by Zhangjiang is the largest. The main collaborators are scholars such as Zhu Liyuan, Zhou Xian, and Wang Ning.

3. Explain the analysis of keywords in the field of academics

Keywords are an important part of academic papers. The collection of keywords in a large number of academic papers in a certain discipline or field in a certain period can reveal the direction of academic research in the discipline or field. Keywords are one of the main scientific measurement methods for studying the theme of discipline. Based on the keywords of academic papers as an analysis object, the research themes that scholars are concerned about by analyzing the frequency characteristics of keywords are used to analyze the frequency characteristics of keywords. Although the selection of keywords is subjective, the distribution of the overall keywords can reflect the theme evolution law in the field of the subject to a certain extent.

According to the statistical results of the number of posts, the development of interpretation has been divided into three stages: 1981-1997, 1998-2007 and 2008-2021. This article uses VosViewer software to analyze the relevant literature of the three development stages of the study, set the threshold of the frequency of keywords, draw an interpretation of the keywords of the academic keywords, and analyze the results of the hot spot.

(1) The analysis results of keywords in the bud stage

From 1981 to 1997, it was the budding stage of domestic interpretation studies. The total number of papers was 380 in this stage, with a total of 1984 keywords, and 977 after the keywords were returned. In order to improve the effect of the clustering class, the threshold of the keywords in total is set to 5 times. Only 46 keywords of the 977 keywords meet this threshold, and the keywords are drawn together, as shown in Figure 3. Keyword clusters are divided into 6 groups. The total number of thesis at this stage is small and the keywords are relatively scattered. Combined with the analysis of keyword cluster results and high quotes, the literature of the budding stage is divided into three types: Western interpretation and research, theoretical use of theoretical use, and literary interpretation. Essence

From the perspective of frequency and connection intensity of keywords, the first is "Gadamol", with 124 times, the highest frequency and the largest connection with other keywords. ; Followed by "Dilai", 99 times, 28.4%of the literature are related to the spiritual interpretation of Dilai; finally for "Heidegger", 70 times, 20.3%of the literature is with Heidegger's here. Interpretation of learning. Leading these three German philosophers, it has formed three research hotspots in the budding stage. "World Philosophy" is a more representative journal published in the Western interpretation of translation results. A total of 23 related documents were published in 1985-1992, including great influence: Habermas, highlands, Lu Xu The "Interpretation Requirements for Interpretation" translated by East and Meng Qing was cited 77 times; Gadamor, "Interpretation of Interpretation" translated by Hong Handing, was cited 75 times. With the enrichment of the translation of results, domestic scholars have begun to interpret the research work in the West, including the research of western interpretation of history, individual theoretical reviews, and briefing, such as: Pan Derong and Qi Xuedong sorted out the previous interpretation, German contemporary interpretation, and The interpretation of other Western schools, this paper is simple and clear, with a clear context, has a certain academic influence, and has been cited 84 times. In 1997, He Weiping analyzed the dialectical perspective of the theory of Gadamer's theory, and believed that Gadamer incorporated dialectics on the basis of Heidegger's ontology ideas, and formed an interpretation, phenomenology, and dialectical laws. The unity of the three, the three documents of the author's theme have been cited more than 15 times. Keywords such as "interpretation", "interpreter", "literary interpretation", "methodology", "interpretation cycle" and "accepting aesthetics" form the hotspots of literary interpretation research at this stage, and related literature accounts for about 10%. Zhang Longxi began to study Western interpretation very early. In 1984, he published an article "Reading" in "Reading". The relationship between learning and interpretation points out the weaknesses of traditional interpretation of the author's original intention. Subsequently, Zhang Longxi published "Benevolence, Wise Seeing Wisdom — A Brief Lays on Explaining and Accepting Aesthetic · Modern Western Literature" in the same journal. The influence of the gap has formed a new theory of literary interpretation and acceptance, and then he conceives to compare Western literature theory with the traditional Chinese literature theory, and lays the foundation for the interpretation of literature as an important branch of interpretation.

In the budding stage, the theoretical use and the relevant keywords of the discipline are not highlighted, but from the perspective of the quantity, later scholars have a high degree of recognition of the literature at this stage. The combination of interpretation and translation has also emerged from the budding stage. For example: Yuan Hong Geng pointed out in 1991 that translation is a special form of interpretation. Using interpretation can more accurately understand the starting language and express the return language more properly to better explain the explanation Culture and thinking gaps outside the language.

(2) The results of the keywords in the growth stage of the analysis of the analysis results

From 1998 to 2007, it was the growth stage of domestic interpretation research. The total number of papers in this stage is 1460, with a total of 6,551 keywords, and a total of 3113 after the keywords are heavy. The threshold of the keywords is set to 5 times, and the 3113 keywords have 159 thresholds that meet this condition. The keywords are drawn, as shown in Figure 4. Compared with the sprouting phase, the number of high -frequency keywords in the growth stage has increased significantly, and there are 32 keywords with frequency of 20 or more, including: interpretation (318 times), Gadamol (195), interpretation, interpretation Learning (153 times), interpretation (122 times), understanding (110 times), Dilai (67 times), philosophical interpretation (58 times), text (53 times), Heidegger (52 times). The research on the research of interpretation is more abundant. At this stage, the introduction of the introduction, research and application of results introduction, research and application of results, and the construction of Chinese interpretation has been achieved. At the same time, the construction of Chinese interpretation has entered a preliminary exploration stage.

Keyword clusters such as "Gadamer", "Heidegger", "Dilai" and "Philosophy Interpretation" are a group, with a total of 158 articles including at least one of the keywords, accounting for about 10.8%of the total number of issues. The keywords centered on the keywords centered on "understanding", "the fusion of the field", "the history of effects" and "interpretation of the learning cycle" form the second largest hot spot, including 105 documents including these four keywords, accounting for about 7.2 of the total number of issues. %. It can be seen that the growth stage continued the research on the theory of western interpretation theory during the growth stage. Domestic scholars still invested a lot of research on the achievements of Gadamol, Dilai, Heidgger and others. The perspective is more three -dimensional, and the analysis of the theory of academic theory is more deeper, and there are also comparative studies on interpretation and other western trends of thought. For example: Peng Qifu analyzed the limitations of Gadammer's philosophical interpretation of the subject theory in 2007, pointing out that readers always try to adopt some methodology when understanding and interpreting the text. He proposed the concept of "vision integration" and further pointed out the methods of semantics, text, history, and psychology to help improve the integration of the field of vision. The literature was cited 83 times. In 2000, Zhang Fa pointed out that Gadmer's "Truth and Methods" made the western cultural circles of phenomenon philosophy, interpretation, and aesthetic research after modern transformation, and analyzed the significance of this book about modern thoughts in the West. The literature was cited 76 times. The third research hotspot focuses on keywords such as "interpretation", "translation research", "translation", "reader", "literary translation", "accepted aesthetics", which reflects the deep integration of interpretation and translation research. There are 79 related papers. At this stage, the top eight literatures are related to translation research, and domestic scholars' preference for western interpretation ideas is also different. For example, in 2000, Xie Tianzhen suggested that during the translation process, the translator faced the text to understand and express the author's original intention. He also agreed with Schryle Max's interpretation ideas and analyzed the necessity of determining the original meaning of the text with its theory. The literature was cited 368 times.

Focusing on "literary interpretation", "Chinese interpretation,", "Schryle Mach" and "interpreter", such as keywords and other keywords form another type of hotspot, accounting for about 7%of the total number of essays, including: comparative interpretation theory and traditional Chinese literary theory, Inquiry and constructing research topics such as the feasibility of Chinese interpretation, the analysis of the interpretation of Qian Yanshu, and the significance of the literary interpretation of the case as the example of the case. In the 1990s, Tang Yijie initiated the topic of "Can you create an interpretation of China?" Once the question was raised, it caused a strong response. The negative views of China ’s interpretation of science believe that even if it is currently unable to build a creative Chinese interpretation theory, it can enrich the theory and method of western interpretation by sorting out the history of Chinese interpretation. Subsequently, Tang Yijie published two more literature discussing the construction of the interpretation of China. In the "On the Creation of the Constitution of China", he sorted out the three different classic annotations of ancient China, thinking that he must fully understand the western interpretation learning. On the basis of studying Chinese classic interpretations, we can build the theoretical system of interpretation of China different from the West. Tang Yijie's series of documents has been cited 241 times, which is an important information about studying the history of Chinese interpretation.

The fifth hotspot focuses on keywords such as "legal interpretation", "methodology", and "epistemology", which reflects the combination of interpretation and legal research. The number of papers is 31. For example: In 2001, Chen Jinzhao discussed the conclusions of regularity and legal interpretation of the law of law based on the theoretical thoughts in Gadelr's "Truth and Method" in Gadelr's "truth and method". The praise of understanding "prejudice" on law education activities has been cited 62 times.

(3) The analysis results of keywords in the stable development stage

From 2008 to 2021, domestic interpretation studies have entered a stage of stable development. As of October 2021, 4075 papers were published. If the keywords appear frequently to 5 or more, the 7684 keywords have 402 keywords to meet this threshold. In order to improve the polyclass effect, after setting the threshold to 10 times, 169 keywords meet this threshold. Draw the keywords together, as shown in Figure 5.关键词出现频次排名前10位的分别是：解释学（591次）、阐释学（533次）、诠释学（490次）、伽达默尔（427次）、视域融合（260次）、 Understand (193 times), forced interpretation (183 times), translation (117 times), literary interpretation (114 times), translator's subjectivity (109 times). There is a certain similarities in the stable development stage and the growth stage of keywords. At the stage of stable development, interpretation of theoretical research and subject fusion of subjects dominated.

Keywords such as "interpretation", "fusion of the field", "translation", "the subjectivity of the translator", "History of Effect" form a major research hotspot. In addition, some newer keywords have appeared in the group, such as:: "George Stanner", "Translation Four Steps", "Explaining the theory of Translation", 640 documents include the above keywords, accounting for about 15.8%of the total, including a large number of translation works combined with the theory of vision integration theory, Steiner translation theory Four steps to study literature. For example, in 2009, West Wind inspected the acceptance of interpretation of the translation of the academic translation in China. He believed that the explanation of the interpretation of the translation of the academic translation was better in acceptance in the Chinese translation industry, but there was still a lot of room for development. The literature was cited 117 times. In 2012, Chai Yan and Yuan Hong Geng pointed out that the theory of vision fusion changed the translation concept and translation strategy based on dual theory, but while paying attention to the contribution of the theory of fusion of the domain, we must also pay attention to the vision in the translation science ratio in the philosophy of the translation science. The fusion is more complicated, and the literature has been cited 17 times. In addition to the use of disciplines such as translation, education, law, etc., it also involves disciplines such as medicine, sports, and media. Such as: In 2010, Wang Yongyan, Guo Lei and others based on the reconstruction of interpretation, the historical history, and the principles of practical rationality to trace the origin of the concepts of the Xuanfu, endowment, the veins, and the diseased of the Chinese medicine Looking forward, the literature was quoted 24 times. A set of keywords centered on "Gadamore", "Heidegger", "Schliel Malach", "Habermas" and "Hussell" are still research hotspots. A total of 512 documents include the above keywords. It accounts for about 12.6%of the total number of literatures at this stage. During the stable development stage, the literature of the interpretation of the translation of schools has gradually decreased, and more comparative analysis literature has appeared. For comparative analysis, these keywords also appear in the use of literature on the theory of interpretation.

The keywords "compulsory interpretation", "literary interpretation", "public interpretation" and "literary criticism" formed a new research hotspot. The research hotspot in this group began to emerge from 2015, and the number of relevant themes each year was relatively stable. A total of 365 documents including the above four keywords, accounting for about 9%of the total number of documents at this stage. In 2014, Zhang Jiang proposed the concept of "compulsory interpretation", which criticized issues such as western contemporary literature and art theory from text discourse, dispel literary indications, and infinitely magnifying text significance. Since the concept of "compulsory interpretation" is proposed, Zhang Jiang and Zhu Liyuan, Wang Ning, and Zhou Xian have launched academic communication on interpretation issues. Zhang Jiang has explained the concepts and characteristics of mandatory interpretation. The reason is to discuss how to determine the boundaries of multiple interpretations. In 2017, Zhang Jiang's explanation was a public behavior and publicity. It defined the new concept of "public interpretation", and gave public interpretation, clear, publicity, constructive, transcendence and reflection. The six characteristics, the concept of public interpretation caused a strong response in the academic community, and the "Public Interpretation Outline" was cited 223 times, which was the highest number of documents at this stage. From the compulsory interpretation to the public interpretation, from the conceptual proposal to the repeated discussion of specific characteristics, Zhang Jiang's goal of building a Chinese interpretation is clear, and its theory has also aroused widespread discussion of scholars. The keywords of this group also include: "China Interpretation", "Identifying the Shiri", "Knowing the World", "The Book of Songs", "Mencius", etc. It can be seen that the construction of the basic concepts of Chinese interpretation relying on the vigorous development of Chinese classic interpretation and research Essence In 2014, Wang Jinfeng and Li Chenggui sorted out the development of Chinese traditional ideas from three aspects: traditional Chinese figures, works and propositions, and provided suggestions for the development of Chinese classic interpretations in the past 20 years. In 2015, Hong Han Ding and Li Qingliang had a dialogue on "how to understand and build a modern interpretation of China". They believed that from the Chinese tradition, Chinese modern interpretation should be called "Tao". wisdom. The historical view of modern West emphasizes that modernity is the main body of the past. Modern influenced the past, but China interprets the traditional concept of inheriting the interaction of Chinese main objects and completion of each other, and aims to build a theoretical system that can produce consensus on Chinese and Western consensus. Essence In 2019, Qian Chunsong proposed that there are many interpretations of Chinese ideological traditions. Establishing Chinese interpretation should fully understand the ideas of western interpretation and deeply refine China's interpretation of practical resources. Explaining the attention of many other disciplines is a dynamic discipline.

summary

- END -