Hongshi Laser was proclaimed by opponents' sniper patents and was announced to be invalidated due to violation of the advertising method.

"Golden Syllabus" northern capital center includes chapters/authors court/risk control

After the 1980s, in the context of continuous progress in science and technology, laser processing was found to replace traditional manufacturing technology. The laser industry "became windy" in Europe, America and Japan for a while. As the members of the track increase, the industry's competition is becoming more intense.

In recent years, the domestic laser cutting equipment market sales revenue of Guangdong Hongshi Laser Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Hongshi Laser") has shown a decline in sales revenue in the market. The weighted average net asset yields decreased, and the macro laser laser has become capable or underwritten in the future.

On the other hand, during the reporting period, the proportion of Hongshi Laser R & D investment was lower than the same value, and the two invention patent applications were rejected because they were not creative. What is regrettable is that in April 2020, Hongshi Laser sued the patent infringement of its competitors' subsidiaries. The patent involved in the case was "sniper" by competitors and was invalidated. Not only that, the Hongshi laser contract disputes have been frequent, and the propaganda content has "eat" a ticket for violating the advertising law. At this point, Hongshi laser internal control or hidden worry.

1. The growth rate of the industry has slowed down, and the gross profit margin of the net profit "driving reversing" is less than the same value as the same value.

The rope can be sawn wood, and the water can be dripped. The changes in revenue and net profit are the embodiment of the continuous profitability of enterprises. However, Hongshi Laser has been "reversing" for two consecutive years.

1.1 2019-2020, the net profit of Hongshi Laser is "driving a reverse"

According to the prospectus signed by Hongshi Laser on December 22, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as "prospectus"), from 2018-2020 and 2021, the operating income of Hongshi Laser was 998 million yuan and 1.215 billion yuan, respectively. The yuan, 1.787 billion yuan, 1.219 billion yuan, net profit was 100 million yuan, 95 million yuan, 80 million yuan, and 111 million yuan.

According to the research of the Northern Capital Center of "Jin Securities", from 2019 to 2020, the operating income of Hongshi Laser's operating income was 21.71%and 47.1%, respectively, and the year-on-year growth rate of net profit was -4.85%and -16.27%, respectively.

It is not difficult to see that from 2019-2020, the net profit of Hongshi Laser "drives reversing".

In addition, from January to June 2020 and 2021, the comprehensive gross profit margin of Hongshi Laser was lower than the industry average.

1.2 The comprehensive gross profit margin is lower than the industry average, and the average net asset yield after deduction has declined year by year

According to the prospectus, compared with the comprehensive gross profit margin, the comparison companies selected by Hongshi Laser are the comparable companies of the Great Laser Technology Industry Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Great Laser"), and Huagong Technology Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Huagong Technology Technology "), Shenzhen Haiming Star Laser Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as" Haimingxing "), Jiangsu Yawei Machine Tool Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as" Yawei Co., Ltd. "), Wuhan Jinyun Laser Co., Ltd. Referred to as "Jinyun Laser").

From 2018-2020 and January to June 2021, the comprehensive gross profit margin of Hongshi Laser was 31.76%, 31.27%, 24.68%, and 29.76%, respectively. During the same period, the average comprehensive gross profit margin of the above five industries in Hongshi Laser was 31.57%, 32.55%, 30.73%, and 29.01%, respectively.

That is to say, from 2018 to 2020, the comprehensive gross profit margin of Hongshi Laser declined year by year. In addition, from 2019 to 2020, the comprehensive gross profit margin of Hongshi Laser is lower than its industry average.

Not only that, from 2018 to 2020, the weighted average net asset yield after the laser laser deduction showed a downward trend as a whole.

According to the prospectus, from January to June 2020 and 2021, the weighted average net asset yields after Hongshi laser deduction was 65.73%, 35.43%, 24.16%, and 25.16%, respectively.

It should be pointed out that the market sales revenue of the main business products of Hongshi Laser's main business has declined.

1.3 From January to June 2020 and 2021, the sales revenue of laser cutting equipment accounted for more than 90 %

According to the prospectus, Hongshi Laser is mainly engaged in the research and development, production and sales of laser cutting equipment, which belongs to the laser processing equipment industry. From the perspective of specific processing applications, laser processing applications can be subdivided into laser cutting, laser welding, laser marking, laser carvings, laser punching, and laser surface treatment.

From January to June 2020 and 2021, the main business revenue of Hongshi Laser was 972 million yuan, 1.173 billion yuan, 1.1706 billion yuan, and 1.185 billion yuan, accounting for 97.44%and 96.54, respectively. %, 95.46%, 97.19%.

During the same period, among the main business products of Hongshi Laser, the sales revenue of graphic fiber laser cutting machines was 654 million yuan, 732 million yuan, 1.094 billion yuan, and 749 million yuan, respectively, accounting for 67.24, respectively. %, 62.41%, 64.16%, 63.2%.

In addition, the sales revenue of Hongshi Laser professional fiber laser pipelines was 94 million yuan, 183 million yuan, 283 million yuan, and 226 million yuan, respectively, accounting for 9.66%, 15.64%, and 16.61, respectively. %And 19.06%, the sales revenue of the plate tube fiber laser cutting machine was 195 million yuan, 224 million yuan, 253 million yuan, and 152 million yuan, respectively, accounting for 20.04%, 19.12%, and 14.82, respectively. %, 12.83%. According to the research of the Northern Capital Center of "Jin Securities", from 2018-2020 and January to June 2021, among the main business products of Hongshi Laser, graphic fiber laser cutting machines, professional optical fiber laser pipes, board pipe optical laser cutting cutting The total sales revenue accounted for 96.94%, 97.17%, 95.59%, and 95.1%, respectively.

In other words, from January to June 2020 and 2021, the total sales revenue of laser cutting equipment of Hongshi laser accounted for more than 90 % of its current main business revenue.

According to the prospectus, from January to June 2021 and 2021, the sales amount of Hongshi Laser was 786 million yuan, 990 million yuan, 1.459 billion yuan, and 1.044 billion yuan, respectively, accounting for its current main business income ratio, respectively. It is 80.87%, 84.42%, 85.51%, 88.07%. During the same period, Hongshi Laser's overseas sales were 186 million yuan, 183 million yuan, 247 million yuan, and 141 million yuan, accounting for 19.13%, 15.58%, 14.49%, and 11.93%of its current main business revenue.

In other words, from January to June 2020 and 2021, the sales amount in Hongshi Laser accounted for more than 80 % of its main business revenue.

However, in recent years, the growth rate of market sales revenue in the domestic laser equipment industry has declined year by year.

1.4 2018-2020, the growth rate of sales revenue in the domestic laser cutting equipment market shows a downward trend

According to Jinan Senfeng Laser Technology Co., Ltd.'s prospectus signed on June 6, 2022, quoting data, 2015-2020, the domestic laser equipment market sales revenue was 34.5 billion yuan, 38.5 billion yuan, 49.5 billion yuan, 60.5 billion yuan, 60.5 billion yuan The yuan, 65.8 billion yuan, and 69.2 billion yuan, the year-on-year growth rates in 2016-2020 were 11.6%, 28.6%, 22.2%, 8.8%, and 5.2%, respectively.

From 2016 to 2020, the domestic laser cutting equipment market sales revenue was 14.17 billion yuan, 18.36 billion yuan, 24.08 billion yuan, 25.66 billion yuan, 26.27 billion yuan, and the year-on-year growth rates in 2017-2020 were 29.57%, 31.15%, and 6.56. %, 2.38%.

It is not difficult to see that from 2019-2020, the net profit of Hongshi Laser "drives reversing". In addition, from 2018 to 2020, the comprehensive gross profit margin of Hongshi Laser declined year by year. During the same period, the average net asset yield of the average net assets of Hongshi Laser declined. It is worth noting that from January to June 2020 and 2021, the sales revenue of the main product laser cutting equipment in Hongshi Laser accounted for more than 90 % of its main business. However, from 2017 to 2020, the domestic laser equipment market sales revenue showed a decline in year-on-year. From 2018 to 2020, the sales revenue of the domestic laser cutting equipment market also showed a downward trend. In the case of the slowdown in the industry's growth, the sustainable profitability of Hongshi laser may be tortured.

It should be pointed out that the proportion of R & D investment in Hongshi Laser is lower than the industry average.

2. Prosecuting competitors patent infringement involved in the patent and invalidation of the patent invalidation.

Innovation ability is the inherent driving force for enterprise development, and one of the core factors to improve the competitiveness of the enterprise market. However, the proportion of Hongshi Laser R & D investment in operating income is lower than the industry average for three consecutive years.

2.1 In 2020, the two patent applications were rejected for not creative

According to the prospectus, from January to June, 2018-2020 and 2021, the R & D investment of Hongshi Laser was RMB 37.7926 million, 55.4949 million yuan, 729,586,600 yuan, and 511.921 million yuan, accounting for 379 for its current operating income, respectively. %, 4.57%, 4.08%, 4.2%.

According to the annual report of the Great Laser 2019-2021, from 2018-2020, the proportion of major laser R & D investment accounted for 9%, 10.95%, and 10.78%, respectively.

According to the annual report of Huagong Technology's 2019-2021, from 2018-2020, the proportion of Huagong Technology R & D investment accounted for 5.7%, 6.1%, and 5.93%, respectively.

According to the prospectus signed on September 1, 2020, Haimu Star, in 2018, Haimu Star R & D investment accounted for 10.3%of operating income.

According to the annual report of Haimingxing 2020-2021, from 2019 to 2020, the proportion of Haiming R & D investment accounted for 8.56%and 8.11%of operating income, respectively.

According to the annual report of Jinyun Laser 2020-2021, from 2018 to 2020, the proportion of Jinyun Laser R & D investment accounted for 6.63%, 6.99%, and 6.55%, respectively. According to the annual report of Yawei's 2019-2021, from 2018-2020, the proportion of Yawei R & D investment accounted for 6.66%, 7.44%, and 7.38%of operating income, respectively.

According to the research of the Northern Capital Center of "Jin Securities", from 2018-2020, the average value of Hongshi Laser's above-mentioned industries with R & D investment accounted for operating income is 7.66%, 8.01%, and 7.75%, respectively, which are higher than the R & D Laser R & D R & D R & D. The proportion of investment in operating income is 3.87 percentage points, 3.44 percentage points, and 3.67 percentage points.

In other words, from 2018 to 2020, the proportion of Hongshi Laser R & D investment in operating income is lower than the industry average.

In addition, in 2020, two patent applications of Hongshi Laser were rejected for not creativity.

2.2 Two patents were rejected because they were not creative, one of which or the core technology corresponding patent

According to data from the State Intellectual Property Office, a invention patent called "A Real -time Monitoring Laser Focus", the application number is 202010324694X, the application time is April 23, 2020, the applicant is Foshan Hongshi Laser Technology Co., Ltd. (The predecessor of Hongshi Laser, the following is collectively referred to as "Hongshi Laser"), the inventor is Li Yuhong and Chang Yong. As of September 26, 2022, the case status of the patent was discharged.

The "Second Examination Opinion Notice" issued on July 21, 2020 shows that the patent's independent claims and subordinate claims for the application were rejected by creativity.

In addition, an invention patent called "a pipe method on a laser pipe pipe machine", the application number is 2020103247660, the application time is April 23, 2020. Chang Yong. As of September 26, 2022, the case status of the patent was discharged.

The "Second Examination Opinion Notice" issued on July 15, 2020 shows that the patent's independent claims and subordinate claims for the application are not creative.

In addition, the invention patent "a pipe method on the pipeline of a laser -cutting machine" involves the technical field of laser -cutting pipes, which specifically involves a pipe material method of a laser pipe tube machine. The purpose of the invention is to provide a laser cutting pipe The pipe method of the machine, the above -mentioned pipes include the base, feeding component, top material component, buffer component, pelvation component, material blocking component and feed board. When the pipes slipped to the material, the kinetic energy of the blocking component, the collision that caused a great impact on the pipe and the pipe and the pipes, the normal operation of the pipe machine, and the advantages of extending the service life of the pipe machine.

In short, in 2020, there are two invention patent applications that have been rejected due to their inability to be creative.

It should be pointed out that Hongshi Laser prosecuted the patent infringement of competitors' subsidiaries. However, the patent involved in the case of Hongshi Laser was objected by competitors, and it was declared invalid by the State Intellectual Property Office.

2.3 Prosecutor's patent infringement of competitors and subsidiaries, and patents involved in the case were reported by competitors to be invalidated

According to the prospectus, the product application scenarios produced by Hongshi Laser are widely used, and the major competitors in the industry in the industry. The Great Laser was founded on March 4, 1999. It is mainly engaged in the research and development, production and sales of laser processing equipment.

According to the annual report of the Great Laser 2021, as of the end of 2021, the Great Laser Laser Intelligent Equipment Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Great Equipment") was a wholly -owned subsidiary of the Great Laser.

According to the prospectus signed by Hongshi Laser on June 22, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as the "2021 version of the prospectus"), on April 26, 2020, Hongshi Laser was equipped with the Great Equipment and Zhongshan Yirui Hardware Products Co., Ltd. (Zhongshan Yirui Hardware Products Co., Ltd. ( The following is referred to as "Yirui Hardware") The patent number of the patent number ZL201720366138.2 patent infringement dispute with the "one type of double roller claw device" shall file a civil lawsuit with the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court.

In addition, Hongshi Laser requires that the Great Equipment will stop infringing the gangsters laser patent rights, stop manufacturing, sales and promise to sell the products that infringe Hongshi laser patent rights, destroy the unprecedented infringing products, and immediately delete all links to all sales of infringing products. , Destroy special equipment and molds for manufacturing infringement products, compensation for economic losses and reasonable costs of 1.0553 million yuan. At the same time, Hongshi Laser requires Yirui Hardware to stop using the products that violate Hongshi laser patent rights. As of June 22, 2021, the signing of the prospectus of 2021, the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court has not made a judgment on the case.

According to the prospectus, a practical new patent called "a double roller claw device" has the patent number ZL201720366138.2, and the application date is April 7, 2017. The right holder is a macro laser. As of December 22, 2021, the patent status of the patent was maintained.

However, after the Hongshi Laser prosecuted the Great Equipment, the Great Equipment was announced invalidated by the patent request involved in the case. In addition, the patent was invalid in September 2021. According to data from the State Intellectual Property Office, a practical new patent called "a double roller claw device" is 2017203661382, and the application time is April 7, 2017. Chang Yong. As of September 26, 2022, the status of the patent case was invalid.

In addition, on December 220, 2020, the "Notice of Requesting for Invalid Declaration" issued by the State Intellectual Property Office showed that on October 23, 2020, it was invalid to claim the people of the People's Congress for laser "a double roller claw device to a practical new patent patent" one type of double roller claw device "The patent rights have requested invalidation requests. After formal review meets the relevant provisions of the Patent Law and Implementation Details and the relevant provisions of the review guide, the State Intellectual Property Office is allowed to accept it.

On September 1, 2021, the "Invalid Decision Decision" issued by the State Intellectual Property Office showed that according to Article 46, paragraph 1 of the Patent Law, the State Intellectual Property Office claimed to be invalidated to request the people of the people to laser laser. The invalid announcement requested by the patent rights for the patent rights was reviewed, and the patent right of the "one type of double roller claw device" of Hongshi Laser's practical patent was invalid.

In other words, after the Hongshi Laser prosecuted the infringement of the Great Equipment of its competitors, the Great Equipment filed an invalid application for the patent involved in the case. In September 2021, the State Intellectual Property Office announced that the patent was invalid. Moreover, the state of the above -mentioned practical new patent, compared with the information disclosed by the State Intellectual Property Office, the Hongshi Laser prospectus or the current "hand shake" letter.

In fact, Hongshi Laser and Great Laser have patent disputes in 2019.

According to the prospectus, on August 29, 2019, the Great Equipment was with Hongshi Laser, Foshan Taizhong Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Foshan Taizhong"), Foshan Taiyida Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. About a practical new patent infringement dispute called a practical new patent infringement of a practical new patent of the patent number of the patent number ZL201420041546.7 filed a civil lawsuit with the patent number ZL201420041546.7. The laser cutting machine (hereinafter referred to as the "infringing product") for the full surround switching station.

In addition, Hongshi Laser Manufacturing and Sales were accused of infringing products. Tai Yida used the indictment of infringing products without permission and violated the patent right involved in the case. In patent behavior, Hongshi Laser stops manufacturing, sales and promises to sell products suspected of infringing patent rights of the Great Equipment. 1 million yuan.

On December 30, 2020, the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court made a first trial judgment to reject all the claims of the Great Equipment. The Great Equipment was dissatisfied with the judgment and appealed to the Supreme Court. On September 14, 2021, the Supreme Court made a second trial judgment to dismiss the appeal of the Great Equipment and maintain the original judgment.

That is to say, the Great Equipment has sued Hongshi laser to infringe its patent right of "fiber laser cutting machine", however, however, the first and second trial court rejected the appeal of the Great Equipment.

2.4 Patent inventor of the same name with the competitors, and the patent application time interval is less than one year

According to data from the State Intellectual Property Office, a practical new patent called "a protective device for protecting and applying its applies" is 201920694320X, the application time is May 13, 2019, and the authorization time is 2020. 2020 On April 28, the applicant was the Great Laser, Shenzhen Dajun Guangju Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Guangju Technology"), and Li Yuhong was one of the inventors of the patent. As of September 26, 2022, the patent case was maintained in patent rights.

According to the 2021 annual report of the Great Laser, as of the end of 2021, Guangju Technology was a wholly -owned subsidiary of the Great Laser.

However, after 10 months of application for the above -mentioned practical new patents with its subsidiary, "Li Yuhong" appeared in the inventor list of Hongshi Laser patent applications.

According to data from the State Intellectual Property Office, a practical new patent called "a laser cutting head mirror set and laser cutter head that is convenient for assembly", the patent number is 2020204497480, the application time is March 31, 2020, the authorization time is the time of authorization is On December 11, 2020, the applicant was a macro laser and Li Yuhong was one of the inventors of the patent. As of September 26, 2022, the patent case was maintained in patent rights.

A invention patent called the "assembly method of a laser cutting header mirror group", the patent number is 202010240391X, the application time is March 31, 2020, and the authorization time is July 24, 2020. Li Yuhong is one of the inventors of the patent. As of September 26, 2022, the patent case was maintained in patent rights.

A practical new patent called "a device with a real -time monitoring laser focus", the patent number is 2020206411573, the application time is April 23, 2020, and the authorization time is February 19, 2021. The applicant is a macro laser. Li Yuhong is one of the inventors of the patent. As of September 26, 2022, the patent case was maintained in patent rights. According to Article 6 of the Patent Law, the task of implementing the unit or the invention created by the material and technical conditions of the unit is mainly used as a job invention. The right to create a patent for the creation of the job belongs to the unit. After the application is approved, the unit is a patent person. The unit can dispose of the right and patent rights of the application patent to create patents in accordance with the law, and promote the implementation and application of relevant invention and creation.

According to Article 12 of the "Implementation Rules for Patent Law" (revised 2010), the position invention and creation of the task completed in Article 6 of the Patent Law in Article 6 of the Patent Law refers to the invention and creation made in this job, (2) The invention and creation of the tasks outside of the unit delivered by the unit, (3) (3) after retirement, transferred from the original unit or within one year after the termination of labor and personnel relations, it is not their own job or their own jobs assumed in the original unit or Inventions related to the task assigned by the original unit.

In other words, the Great Laser and Hongshi Laser are competitors, and the patent inventor of the Great Laser, "Li Yuhong", "hit the name" with the patent inventor of the Hongshi Laser, and the time interval of the patent application of both parties is less than one year. Is the coincidence of the same name or the same person? If for the same person, did Li Yuhong leave from the laser? Is it related to the patent application of Hongshi Laser less than one year after his departure. Is it related to the task assigned by the original unit? unknown.

Not only that, from the above situation, from 2018 to 2020, the proportion of Hongshi Laser R & D investment is lower than the industry average. In addition, in 2020, two invention patent applications in Hongshi Laser were rejected for not creativity. There is a patent infringement dispute between Hongshi Laser and its competitors. Among them, in April 2020, Hongshi Laser prosecuted its competitors' subsidiaries of the Great Equipment to infringe on its patent rights, and then was announced by the Great CNC and involved in the patent involved in the case. The case was involved in the case. The patent has been declared all the patent rights to be invalid, and so "reversal" is sighing.

In addition, there are many lawsuits in Hongshi Laser.

Third, the contract disputes are frequent, and the promotion content has "eat" a ticket for violating the advertising law

There is no rules and cannot be made up. However, Hongshi Laser was punished for publishing non -compliance ads.

3.1 As of December 22, 2021, the signing of the prospectus, there are a number of undispable lawsuits or arbitration

According to the prospectus, as of December 22, 2022, the signing of the prospectus, Hongshi Laser and its subsidiaries have many litigation or arbitration situations that have not yet ended, involving labor contract disputes and trading contract disputes.

Specifically, in March 2021, Hongshi Laser, as the plaintiff, sued the defendant Li Jun. The nature of the case was a dispute over a labor contract. As of the signing of the prospectus on December 22, 2021, the case has made a first trial judgment. Hongshi Laser pays a default damage of RMB 61,200 and rejected Li Jun's claim.

In July 2021, Hongshi Laser was sued the defendant Hou Wen as the plaintiff. The nature of the case was a labor contract dispute. As of December 22, 2021, 2021, the case has made arbitration. For 10,000 yuan, Hongshi Laser did not accept rulings and had sued the court of first instance.

In August 2021, Hongshi Laser, as the plaintiff, sued the defendant Linyi Hongde Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Hongde Machinery"). The case is in the process of first instance.

In December 2021, Hongshi Laser, as the plaintiff, sued the defendant Zhongshan Hanqi Medical Equipment Technology Co., Ltd., which was a dispute over the trading contract. As of December 22, 2021, the case was in the process of the first instance.

In November 2021, the plaintiff Wang Lei sued Hongshi Laser's wholly -owned subsidiary Suzhou Hongshi Laser Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Suzhou Hongshi"). On the 22nd, the case was under arbitration.

Not only that, Suzhou Hongshi also has administrative penalties.

According to the prospectus, on January 30, 2019, Suzhou Hongshi received the "Administrative Penalty Decision" issued by the Xiangcheng District Brigade of the Suzhou Public Security Fire Detachment. Yuan's punishment. For the punishment, Suzhou Hongshi had paid a fine on February 11, 2019.

It is not difficult to see that as of the signing of the prospectus on December 22, 2021, there were many lawsuit disputes in Hongshi Laser, and his subsidiary Suzhou Hongshi was punished for not completing the acceptance of the leasing plant.

It is worth noting that the contract disputes involved in Hongshi laser may not stop there.

3.2 As of September 26, 2022, due to the inquiry date, the total compensation of over 2 million yuan due to the dispute over the sales contract

According to (2021) Guangdong 0606 Documents No. 14059, on May 17, 2021, the plaintiff Xinxiang Tianrun Printing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to The case was filed for a trial on July 13, 2021. The court believes that the case is a dispute between a sales contract. According to the "Laser Cutting Machine Order Contract" signed by the plaintiff Tianrun Printing and the defendant Hongshi Laser, combined with the statement of the defendant The relationship between buying and selling contracts is objective and real, legal and effective, and confirm. In addition, according to the existing evidence, the plaintiff Tianrun Printing failed to handle the financial lease issues and could not confirm whether the original defendant Hongshi Laser and Xie Guisheng had faults, and the financial lease payment method agreed in the contract was not achieved. Being able to achieve a new contract on payment of payment, and failed to negotiate within four years of time, the contract in this case has no basis and necessity of continuing to perform. The defendant Hongshi Laser was canceled on May 21, 2021. Since the termination of the contract was not caused by the plaintiff's breach of contract, the deposit received by the defendant Hongshi Laser should be returned to the plaintiff Tianrun Printing.

In response, the court ruled that the defendant Hongshi Laser should return a deposit of 100,000 yuan to the plaintiff Tianrun Seal within ten days from the date of the judgment.

In addition, according to (2021), Circular 36124, Guangdong 0606, the plaintiff Dalian Meijialian Metal Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Meijialian") sued the defendant Hongshi Laser due to a dispute over a sales contract. After the Hitachi case was accepted, the trial was opened on January 18, 2022.

According to the Civil Code, the case is determined that the device delivered by the defendant Hongshi Laser has not completed the debugging work and failed to meet the technical standards agreed by the two parties, which constitutes the purpose of breach of contract and so that the two parties cannot sign the contract. The "Fixed Protection Contract" signed by the two parties on June 3, 2020 is legal, and the court supports it. According to the above laws, the contract was terminated as the court on December 25, 2021, the copy of the court to the defendant Hongshi Laser.

In response, the court ruled that the plaintiff Meijialian and the defendant Hongshi Laser signed the "Settlement Contract" on June 30, 2020 and the "Settlement Contract" was canceled on December 25, 2021. The defendant Hongshi Laser within ten days from the date of legal effect on the judgment, one time he refunded the payment of 1.8 million yuan to the plaintiff Meijialian; he paid 360,000 yuan to the plaintiff Meijialian at one time.

It can be seen that Hongshi Laser has a total of 2.26 million yuan in disputes over the two trading contracts.

It is worth noting that Hongshi Laser was punished for publishing advertising violations.

3.3 In June 2022, it was punished for publishing the propaganda content of deception and misleading consumers

According to the Punishment of the Supervisor of the North City of Guangdong and Fosun (No. 2022 ﹞ 6, the Government of Beizhen Town, Shunde District, Foshan City and the attorney of the attorney of Hongshi Laser, the propaganda content released by the Hongshi Laser to deceive and mislead consumers It affects consumer purchase tendency. Hongshi Laser released advertisements to publicize its products, "the shortest industry", "King of Efficiency", "Outstanding Selection", "Extremely Sealing and Dust Effect", "The highest standard of the industry", "laser pipe cutting machine industry The product series is the most complete and the most widely used brand "and other contents." Absolutely used in advertisements.

In addition, Hongshi Laser promotes a number of patents in advertising. Hongshi Laser can provide the corresponding invention patent certificate and a practical new patent certificate. The national territory used in the advertisement in the advertisement is incomplete. Hongshi Laser has deleted or modified the above -mentioned illegal advertisements on May 22, 2022.

In this regard, on June 17, 2022, the government of Beiyi Town, Shunde District, Foshan City decided to order Hongshi Laser to eliminate the impact within the corresponding range and fined the Hongshi laser 50,000 yuan.

It can be seen above that as of September 26, 2022, the Hongshi Laser has a number of lawsuits and has been caught in a dispute over a sales contract. Not only that, Hongshi Laser has incomplete "eating" fines for violating the advertising law and the national territory used in advertisements. At this point, Hongshi laser internal control or hidden worry.

The old man, ambitious in thousands of miles. Faced with the above problems, can Hongshi laser be trusted to investors? To be inspected.

- END -