Shen Yi: As a subversion tool, the "kiss of death" to the US company is

The U.S. Treasury Department recently issued a common license for Iran, the main content is to reduce the sanctions scope of the software/communication service category of Iran, allowing social media platforms, collaborative platforms, video conference software and related businesses to support such services. The company provides services to Iranian individuals and companies. At the same time, it is encouraged to bypass the Iranian government to export software and tools that can be used to fight against government network management and control strategies, especially allowing Iranian developers to create local anti -surveillance and anti -review applications.

The background issued by this universal license is currently a turbulent situation in Iran. In the process, the Iranian government controlled the Internet, and the US government adopted a method of hedging, including issuing a method of issuing a common license for Iran. From the perspective of the development of Iran's domestic affairs and the general response of the United States and Western countries, it is a copy of the "Arab Spring" in Tunisia and Egypt from the end of 2010 to the beginning of 2011. Washington's response basically continued the Internet freedom strategy advocated by Hillary. This time the US Ministry of Finance explained to the news of the new general -purpose license and maintained the results of the results of the Hillary State Council dinner on January 7, 2010, which remained amazing. Consistent. One of the participants in the dinner later published a real -name article and clicked the core results of the discussion: Facebook, Twitter and other platforms were tools for US foreign policy. Although the seminar has passed 12 years, Hillary's Internet freedom still dominates the core of the Democratic Party's decision -making core.

As far as this permit and the decision -making concepts and ideas behind it are concerned, there are three remarkable features:

First, the US government insists on trying to turn the Internet and its related applications into an exclusive diplomatic tools monopolized in the United States in the United States in order to obtain asymmetric advantages to unilaterally subvert other countries. The Internet freedom advocated by Hillary is that the United States and its allies have used the Internet social media platform to interfere with the asymmetric freedom of other regimes of other countries and subvert other countries, and the United States and Western companies must obey and serve this freedom. The so -called "asymmetric" can see the US presidential election in 2016. After Hillary lost to Trump accidentally, the United States set off a political trend of chase Facebook and Twitter. The company did not effectively block the penetration and utilization of Russia identified by Hillary, which actually led Moscow to repeat the "Internet Free Strategy" in the United States and control the results of the presidential election. Media account to eliminate its ability to mobilize through social media. Therefore, allowing the US government to obtain specific asymmetric advantages relative to other countries, and allowing certain political factions in the country to obtain asymmetric advantages in other political factions and characters, the current US government's Internet freedom strategy has been clearly exposed.

Second, the political and business relationship with the core characteristics of the U.S. company's unconditional observation of the U.S. government's political instructions is the institutional foundation of such policies. The private market economy of privatization is the core brand that American Internet companies continue to build in the world, but whether it is the 2010 Hillary's Internet freedom strategy, the political siege after the 2016 election, the social media platform after the 2020 election witch -hunting style Placing, or the general permit when Iran is in a turbulent, all show that American political and business relations are the institutional foundation of such management and control policies. American companies were tied to US diplomacy "chariots" and did not conceal their diplomatic strategic tools. When Washington implements the US foreign strategy, the most priority scene is to challenge and subvert other countries, encourage and enlarge the political and social turbulence of other countries, and seek software products that produce American companies, to provide software services, focus on focusing, focus On the cognitive shaping and control of other countries.

Third, the lack of coherent and consistent decision -making styles, based on the formulation of multi -department competitive bureaucratic models, continued to strengthen the chaos characteristics of related decision -making in the United States. After the end of the Cold War, with the passage of time, a general perception of the United States to the world was a continuous decline in strategic decision -making and policy formulation capabilities. Although the policy formulation of the United States has the significant characteristics of multi -department competitive bureaucracy, the policy chaos lacks coherent or the policy is contrary to the purpose to be achieved, giving people a strong sense of chaos. Judging from the US government's policy of Iranian policy, when Iran has nothing to do with the Internet and the Internet is normal, Washington implements strict export controls on Iran. Inside; after Iran goes out and controls the network, Washington has begun to encourage various products and services to export the exports of Iran, and even publicly set the target of exports as "promoting the internal political turmoil of Iran", and even "subverting Iran regime". The unknown distortion of the American hegemony comes.

- END -