Guizhou introduced the implementation rules for the implementation of government investment project decisions

In order to strengthen the decision -making and management of the Guizhou Provincial Government's investment projects, improve the decision -making evaluation procedures, improve the scientific and democratic nature of decision -making evaluation, and ensure the quality of decision -making and evaluation. Recently, the Guizhou Provincial Development and Reform Commission and the Provincial Department of Finance jointly issued the "Guizhou Provincial Government Investment Project Decision Evaluation Implementation Rules (Interim) "(hereinafter referred to as" Implementation Rules ").

The "Implementation Rules" total 7 chapters and 32 articles, which have stipulated the scope, procedures, and main contents of government investment project decision -making and evaluation, as well as evaluation and demonstration agencies management, work standards, quality management, etc., and further clarified the "financial budget arrangement funds" "funds" " The relevant concepts such as fiscal funds "simplified the evaluation process of multi -faceted and wide -point, simple technical solutions, simple construction content, and a total investment of less than 5 million yuan, and standardized the review of local government bond fund support projects. At the same time, the "Implementation Rules" clearly proposes to select the evaluation and demonstration agency in accordance with the prescribed procedures, and implement paid services. The service price shall be determined by the commissioner and the evaluation and demonstration agency with reference to the relevant requirements and regulations of the industry.

In the next step, the Provincial Development and Reform Commission will urge all regions to regulate decision -making and evaluation, improve the ability and level of decision -making and evaluation, and "access to the project" for the project. At the same time, the relevant departments will be jointly carried out in a timely manner of the "Implementation Rules" to ensure that the decision -making and evaluation work will be implemented in a timely manner.

Implementation rules for the implementation of the decision -making evaluation of the Guizhou Provincial Government

(Interim)

Chapter 1 General Principles

Article 1 In order to strengthen the management of government investment project decision -making and management, improve the decision -making evaluation procedures, and improve the quality of decision -making and evaluation, in accordance with the "Guizhou Provincial Government Investment Project Management Measures" (Order 202 of the Guizhou Provincial People's Government) and relevant regulations, these implementation rules are formulated.

Article 2 All government investment projects shall be "evaluated first, decision -making". In accordance with regulations, government investment projects that report national approval or apply for national subsidy funds require our province to match fiscal budget funds, and decision -making and evaluation procedures should also be performed. The operation and maintenance and decoration projects are implemented in accordance with the relevant procedures of government procurement.

Article 3 The financial budget funds in government investment projects mainly include:

(1) General public budget arrangements for the construction of fixed asset investment projects and other special construction funds;

(2) Construction funds for government fund budget arrangements;

(3) Construction funds obtained by the government in accordance with the law;

(4) Building funds for state -owned capital operation budget arrangements;

(5) Other funds incorporated into government budget management.

Article 4 Its projects that have been approved and recorded in accordance with the principles of marketization, and applying for financial funds shall be applied for financial funds to perform decision -making evaluation and related approval procedures in accordance with the provisions of these rules. The investment in financial funds stipulated in this article does not include government investment funds for market -oriented operations, investment subsidies, loan discounts and other subsidy funds, as well as the feasibility gap subsidy and the feasibility gap subsidy of the government and social capital cooperation (PPP) project that has been completed and put into operation. Government paid and other operating management funds.

Article 5 Government investment projects with multi -channel sources of funds shall, in principle, shall be led by the department of the feasibility study report of the approval project to carry out decision -making and evaluation. It may also guide relevant local or departments to carry out decision -making in accordance with the principle of "preparation of rights". Evaluation work, related decision -making evaluation results are an important basis for project approval.

Article 6 The decision evaluation shall be carried out before the project is projecting. The project unit shall strengthen the preliminary work of the project and provide relevant materials that provide the in -depth requirements of feasible research reports (pre -research) as an important reference and basis for evaluation and demonstration.

There are government investment projects in the following situations. Decision and evaluation should be carried out before the feasibility study report of the approval project:

(1) No longer approved project proposal;

(2) The combined approval of the project proposal and feasibility study report;

(3) Those who have been included in relevant national and provincial planning.

Projects that have been established before October 8, 2021 may not perform the decision evaluation procedures.

Article 7 The evaluation and review can be carried out simultaneously with the relevant review work according to the work needs. After the decision evaluation is approved, the project approval department approves the project proposal or feasibility study report in accordance with regulations. The project decision evaluation cannot be replaced by the project's basic construction procedures. In the process of approval project proposal or feasibility study report, the adjustment ratio of the construction plan that appears and evaluates and demonstrates the proposal reaches one -third or more, the funding estimation of more than 10%or more, and the financial capital contribution cannot be in place in time and other major changes. , Reinstall the decision evaluation procedure in accordance with the authority. Article 8 The projects that are included in the annual plan of the government at the level shall perform the decision -making and evaluation procedures, and in principle, it shall be a project that can be affordable at this level. For projects that strive for subsidies for subsidies for superiors, we should ensure that the sources of supporting funds at this level should be reliable and clarify how to implement the specific measures of the project's funding source if the subsidy funds are not obtained in a timely and full amount. Decision evaluation shall not be included in the annual plan of government investment at the same level.

Article 9 For government investment projects with a multi -faceted and wide -ranging, simple technical plan, simple construction content, and a single construction content, and a total investment of less than 5 million yuan, the classification can be classified and evaluated and demonstrated according to batches.

Chapter 2 Decision Evaluation Mechanism

Article 10 Development and reform at all levels and financial departments in conjunction with the relevant industry authorities are responsible for the evaluation of government investment projects at the same level, and make decisions in accordance with regulations.

Municipal and county development and reform and financial departments will hold an evaluation and demonstration meeting in a timely manner with the industry authorities, focus on reviewing the evaluation opinions issued by the intermediary agency, and jointly issue a comprehensive assessment report based on the review opinions of the industry authorities. The comprehensive evaluation report is reported to the executive meeting of the people's governments at the same level to review and decide. Relevant time limit requirements and reference review requirements shall be implemented in accordance with relevant regulations.

Article 11 The Provincial Development and Reform Commission and the Provincial Department of Finance, together with the provincial industry authorities, establish a joint meeting system for government investment project decision -making and evaluation (hereinafter referred to as joint provincial joint conferences), which are mainly responsible for the decision -making and evaluation of government investment projects at the provincial government at the provincial government Evaluation and argumentation of grade review projects. The Provincial Joint Conference Office is located in the Provincial Development and Reform Commission and is responsible for the daily work of decision -making and management.

In the provincial government investment projects, the project unit shall meet the relevant materials of the in -depth requirements of the feasibility study (pre -research) of the feasible research report (pre -research) before the 10th of each month, as well as the application for the joint meeting of the provincial joint meeting.

The Provincial Joint Conference held an evaluation and demonstration meeting in a timely manner in mid -to -late month to centrally review the evaluation opinions issued by the intermediary agency, and jointly issued a comprehensive assessment report based on the review opinions of the industry authorities. If it is required to be reported to the provincial people's government executive meeting to review and decide, or has a significant impact on economic and social development, major projects involving major public interests or vital public interests of the public, the Provincial Development and Reform Commission and the Provincial Department of Finance believe that it is necessary to report to the Provincial People's Government. If the executive meeting is reviewed and decided, the provincial people's government's executive meeting shall be submitted for review.

Article 12 If the county -level government debt ratio is 300%or above, and there is a gap in the guarantee of the "three guarantees" guarantee or the principal and interest of government bonds, the new project will be reviewed and decided by the executive meeting of the Municipal (State) People's Government and will report the results to the provincial development according to the quarterly development. The Reform Commission and the Provincial Department of Finance filed.

Chapter III Decision Evaluation Main Content

Article 13 Evaluation and demonstration shall focus on the need to demonstrate the implementation of the project, the feasibility of economic technology, the scale of construction and the rationality of the project cost, the reliability of the funding sources, and the financial tolerance. Whether it is in line with the actual situation, whether the new projects cause the "three guarantees" gap, whether the fund balance plan is feasible, energy consumption, major risk hidden dangers formed, and hidden dangers of major project social stability risks.

The total investment of government investment projects at the provincial level does not exceed 30 million yuan.

Article 14 The reference review of the project shall review the source of the project's funds and whether the fundraising plan is reasonable, whether the own funds are true, whether the financial capital contribution is in line with the financial tolerance of the area, whether the financing will increase the hidden debt of the government, and whether the project income is in line with the reality. , Whether the financing is self -balanced.

According to regulations, the county -level government investment projects that shall be reviewed by the provincial -level censorship shall be reported and reported to the county -level people's government to report the results of the decision -making results. The review stipulated in this paragraph refers to the review of the rationality, feasibility, and funding source reliability of the project construction, and issue clear review opinions on the rationality, feasibility, and funding source reliability of the project.

Article 15 The competent industry department shall issue an industry review opinion on the evaluation and demonstration of government investment projects. The main content shall include whether the project meets the industry development planning and relevant policies, whether the project application information is complete, and whether the source of the project funds is feasible.

Article 16 The sources of funds include the municipal and county government investment projects that apply for local government bond funds. If the financial budget funds at this level fail to reach the prescribed amount or use the financial budget funds at the same level, but the total investment does not reach the prescribed amount, the government at the same level shall be at the same level. Carry out decision -making and evaluation in accordance with regulations, no need to report to the sources of funds for review.

The municipal and county government's investment projects that apply for local government bonds, and the development reform and reform of the same level, and the financial department should implement the total control of the amount of local government bonds. In principle, the decision -making and evaluation of the annual total amount of bonds through the project shall not exceed the amount of bonds distributed in the previous year. And it should be clear that if the local government bonds fail to apply for the successful application, how to implement the specific measures of the fund's funding sources shall not be reviewed if the source of funds does not clearly clear. Article 17 The content of the evaluation and demonstration report includes: title and text number, catalog, summary, text, attachment. The evaluation and demonstration agency shall notify the project unit in writing when requiring related information in the evaluation work. The written notice and supplementary information shall be submitted to the development reform and financial department as an attachment of the assessment and demonstration report.

Chapter 4 Evaluation and Research Institution Management

Article 18: The province's all levels and relevant departments shall select the best programs in accordance with the prescribed procedures to select engineering consulting units with corresponding majors (special) or above credit, and government investment project review agencies as evaluation and demonstration agencies. Evaluation and demonstration agencies should put forward evaluation and demonstration opinions in accordance with the principles of professional, independent, objective, and just to promote decision -making evaluation more scientific, standardized, and efficient.

Units and institutions that are included in the blacklist by the national credit information sharing platform (Guizhou) and "Credit China (Guizhou)" shall not entrust them to take on decision -making and evaluation tasks.

Article 19 Evaluation and demonstration agencies shall record the online approval supervision platform of investment projects. The evaluation and demonstration agency shall establish a written contract with the entrusting party, stipulates that all parties are rights and obligations and observe them together.

Article 20 The evaluation and demonstration agency participates in the evaluation theory to confirm the paid service. The service price shall be determined by the relevant requirements and regulations of the two parties in accordance with the relevant requirements and regulations of the industry, to promote high -quality and high -quality prices, and prohibit price monopoly and malicious low -priced competition.

The assessment and demonstration agency and its staff shall not charge any fees to the project units that are evaluated, and shall not collect the cost of the project unit.

Article 21 The assessment and demonstration report shall be based on relevant laws and regulations, development planning, technical standards, and industrial policies.

Chapter 5 Evaluation and Research Institution Standards

Article 22 After accepting the task of evaluation and demonstration, the evaluation and demonstration agency shall determine the person in charge of the project, set up an evaluation and demonstration team, formulate an evaluation and demonstration work plan, timely feedback the evaluation and demonstration work progress, and submit the evaluation and demonstration report within the prescribed time limit.

The person in charge of the project shall be a consulting engineer (investment) registered by practicing. The personnel participating in the evaluation and demonstration team should be familiar with the national and industry development of relevant policies and regulations, technical standards, and technical standards. The evaluation team should have more than two -thirds of senior technical titles of their majors.

Article 23 The assessment and argumentation of confidential -related projects shall, in accordance with the "Conservative State Secret Law" and the provisions of the implementation regulations, shall conduct confidential management by the development reform and financial department through signing a confidentiality agreement with the evaluation and demonstration agency and supervising the implementation.

Article 24 The assessment and demonstration report shall be a list of project leaders and members of the assessment and demonstration team, and stamped with special seals (investment) of the consulting engineer (investment) of the evaluation and demonstration agency and project leader.

Article 25 The completion time of the development and reform of the development reform, the financial department and the industry authorities generally does not exceed 30 working days.

If the evaluation and demonstration agency is indeed difficult to complete within the prescribed time limit due to special circumstances, it shall be extended to the development reform and the written report of the financial department before 3 working days from the prescribed time limit to the date of date. The time limit, but the extended period must not exceed 45 working days.

Chapter 6 Evaluation and Research Quality Management

Article 26 The assessment and demonstration agency shall establish and improve the quality management system and the employment archives system, optimize the evaluation work process, improve the evaluation expert database, ensure that the evaluation work is independent, fair, objective, and scientific, and to the content of the assessment and demonstration report. Reality, integrity, compliance, feasibility, and evaluation and demonstration results are responsible.

Article 27 The development reform and reform of the financial departments at all levels accepts reports and complaints on the assessment and demonstration agencies, and organizes or entrust relevant agencies and experts to conduct inspections and verification, and shall be dealt with accordingly according to regulations.

After the evaluation and demonstration task is completed, the entrusted unit shall conduct a quality evaluation of the evaluation and demonstration report, and explain the reasons for the results of the evaluation. Evaluation of the assessment and demonstration reports are divided into good, general, and poor. The results of the quality evaluation were reported by the Municipal (State) Development and Reform Department to the provincial development and reform commission before the end of December each year, and linked to the service costs of the evaluation and demonstration.

Article 28 If there is one of the following circumstances, the development and reform of the development and the financial department shall make public criticism and include the "blacklist" of the "blacklist" according to the situation:

(1) Evaluation and argument reports have major mistakes and seriously inconsistent facts;

(2) The commission task is not completed within the prescribed time limit or approved delay time limit.

If the situation listed above (1) appears, the relevant credit information should be included in the national credit information sharing platform (Guizhou) according to law; if the circumstances are serious, the "credit China (Guizhou)" website will be announced to the public. For the consulting engineer (investment) involved in the National Development and Reform Commission, it is recommended to cancel its practice registration.

Article 29 The relevant staff of the development reform, finance and industry supervisors, etc., who neglected their duties, abuse their powers, abuse their powers, have fraud, and take bribes in the process of evaluation and management.If you are given a crime, the criminal responsibility is investigated according to law.Chapter 7 Affiliated

Article 30 Development and reform, and the financial department shall propose funding demand in accordance with the previous year's entrusted evaluation and demonstration task, and incorporates the preliminary work expense budget of the next year and issue arrangements.

Article 31 These rules shall be explained by the Guizhou Provincial Development and Reform Commission and the Guizhou Provincial Department of Finance.

Article 32 This detailed rules shall be implemented from the date of printing.

Written article: Guizhou Daily Tianyan Journalist Wang Shuyi

Edit: Yu Hui

- END -