This index is released!Shenzhen ranks first in the larger market

On June 16, the "2022" Law Blue Book of Law and the Development of the rule of law "jointly sponsored by the Institute of Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and the Social Science and Literature Publishing House was held in Beijing, and the" Chinese Government Transparency Index Report (China Government Transparency Index ( "2021)", for the 13th consecutive year, a third -party assessment was conducted on the national government. The evaluation results show that in 2021, the Shenzhen Municipal Government's transparency index jumps first among the larger municipal government, rising one more than the previous year. At the same time, the Shenzhen Luohu District Government's transparency index ranked ninth among the county (city, district) government, ranking one more than the previous year.

Lu Yanbin, director and researcher of the Cartoon of the Law of the Law of the Institute of Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said that based on the evaluation of decision -making, disclosure of management services, execution and results disclosure, the construction of government affairs open platforms, and in accordance with the application of the application, it was released in China. Government transparency index evaluation results. The evaluation results show that the overall progress of government affairs is obvious. There are 5 large cities and 33 counties (cities, districts) governments score less than 60 points, while in 2020, such objects are 5 provincial governments, 9 larger municipal government and 54 54, respectively. The county (city, district) government, three types of government agencies score less than 60 points, are less than 2020 evaluation results.

The reporter found that the results of the evaluation showed that the larger cities ranked at the forefront: Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shantou, Jinan, Hefei, Ningbo, Chengdu, Yinchuan, Guangzhou, Suzhou.

Among them, the Shenzhen Municipal Government's decision -making disclosure scores are 87.80, and the management service disclosure scores are 81.70. The implementation and results disclosure scores are 81.15. According to the application disclosure, it scores 87.50. According to different weights, the total score of the Shenzhen Municipal Government's transparency index is 84.97, ranking first in the larger city.

At the same time, the county (city, district) governments are in the forefront: Shanghai Putuo District, Jiangbei District, Ningbo City, Xicheng District, Beijing, Shanghai Jinshan District, Shanghai Hongkou District, Jinhua City Yiwu City, Huizhou District, Huangshan City, Huangshan City, Huangshan City, Huizhou District, Huangshan City, and Huangshan City Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Luohu District, Shenzhen, Dongcheng District, Beijing.

Among them, the Shenzhen Luohu District Government's decision -making disclosure score is 79.90, and the management service disclosure score is 76.36. The execution and results are scored 79.70. According to different weights, the total transparency index of the Luohu District Government of Shenzhen City is 80.57, ranking ninth in the county (city, district).

In addition, the State Council departments are in the forefront: the Ministry of Transport, the State Taxation Administration, the State Market Supervision and Administration Administration, the Ministry of Water Resources, the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the National Forestry and Grassland Bureau, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Commerce, the Ministry of Finance, the Bank of China, the Bank of China, and the Bank of China Insurance Supervision and Administration Commission.

The provincial governments are at the forefront: Beijing, Shanghai, Anhui Province, Shandong Province, Guangdong Province, Sichuan Province, Hubei Province, Chongqing, Guizhou, Jiangsu Province.

The Blue Book pointed out that the results of the evaluation also showed that there was an uneven development phenomenon in public affairs. The provincial government is generally better than the larger municipal government and county (city, district) governments. In this evaluation, the maximum and minimum points of the provincial government than the municipal and county (cities, districts) governments, the highest scores were 87.68 points, 84.97 points, and 84.82 points, and the minimum points were 60.32 points, 53.26 points, and 53.26 points. 38.48 points, with an average score of 75.35 points, 71.40 points, and 59.78 points. This shows to a certain extent that the level of government openness of local governments declines with the level of decline.

The blue book believes that the level of public government affairs in some local governments is inconsistent with its region and economic development. The relationship between the government's transparency and the level of the region and the economic development level shows that although the level of government affairs opens the characteristics of the eastern leader and follows the central and western parts, the transparency of the evaluation objects in the western region is not low, and the performance of individual eastern regions is not good. The region and economic development level will not inevitably improve the level of government affairs, but those who do well in government affairs are often in areas with good economic and social development or great potential. Although some local governments are located in the eastern central region or the economic development is better, there is a lag in their disclosure of government affairs, and there is still much room for improvement in the publicity of government affairs and the construction of the rule of law.

The above pictures are provided by the Symposium organizer China Academy of Social Sciences and Social Science Literature Publishing House

Content source: Shenzhen Special Economic Zone News

Reporter: Li Ping

- END -